So you accept the fact that Trump did more for Ukraine than Obama did. Good, now we're making headway. Now, with respect to Vindman - the Constitution gives the POTUS the pwer to conduct foreign policy. I can see no logic that suggests there is anything in there that gives a military officer the right to try and undermine the POTUS in that endeavor. And, in fact, there's a case to be made under the UCMJ that what he is doing is treasonous. And, wrt Steve Bannon - nothing he has put forth substantiates the claim that Wikileaks got the emails from Russia, or that Stone had access to anything that wasn't already in the public domain. Stone was convicted for lying to Congress (which is an outrage considering that they can and do lie to the American people every time they open their freaking mouths), not for anything even remotely related to "Russia" (yet I see reuters took it upon themselves to put Russia in the key words in their link. That's the very definition of "fake news).