The Republicans don't have a history of racism.

[Sgt Staples]

I didn't say there are no Republican racists.
Your reading is askew.
I said that the Republican Party is NOT racist.
The Democratic Party IS racist.
The Democratic Party has convinced many Americans that they are incapable of being racist that the Republican Party is a racist party. This is a lie.

The Democratic Party believes, and shows this belief in their actions and laws...........that black people are unable to think for themselves and care for themselves and must be given a break as if they are mentally challenged or something. The Democratic Party believes the same about women.

The Republican Party believes that black people and women are .........people.........and are quite capable.

The Democrat Party pushes the idea that by not coddling blacks and women and giving them special treatment (as you would give to a little child) the Republicans are therefore "racist". To buy into this Democrat story is stupid.

There are far more Democrat Racists than Republicans.

The first thing a Democrat sees when they look at a person is either their race, their sex or their 'gender identification.'

The first thing a Republican does when he sees a person, is judge them by the content of their character, exactly what MLK did.

 

[GreenBean]

So, you are obviously a follower of Malcolm X; he is a charismatic fellow.

Are you a Muslim as well? Stupid question, I know. The answer is obvious.

Now, I wouldn't normally ask this of a Muslim, but you've exhibited some erratic behavior: Are you planning to blow yourself up? If you are, please consider self-immolation rather than explosives. I find that much more impressive; it really makes a statement about your commitment to the cause, and innocent people aren't harmed.

The American Black Muslims do not "blow things up" - they are not accepted by mainstream middle eastern Arab Muslims and youre ignorance is superfluous.

 

[GreenBean]

Listen, Moron, I don't give a fvck about Malcolm X and what he said, and I don't care if you hang on his every word. You are a goddamn idiot arguing the Republicans don't enjoy a history of racism.

That felt good.

Listen, Moron, I don't give a fvck about about what you have to say. You are here for entertainment purposes only , you're a goddamn idiot who makes your side look like a bunch of blithering idiots.

Just cutrious ? >>>> Are you a conservative who created a parody avatar of an ignorant red neck Liberal, to make the liberals look bad ? If so.... let me remind you of two things.

1. Liberals don't need any help appearing uninformed , ignorant and stupid - they do just fine all by themselves.

2. Conservatives do not engage in underhanded and dirty tricks like that - that's a Democratic tactic - we prefer to play clean. - Got it ?!


Now getting back on topic - for any real people who might read this .....


The Democrat Party is and always has been, the party of the four S’s: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the Jim Crow laws. The Democrats that started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats who fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.

Republicans founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson realizing that he couldn't beat the flow of history masterfully hijacked the Civil Rights movement and rationalized it to his fellow racists in the Dem. Party

These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now, we've got to do something about this; we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. for if we don't move at all, then their allies [The Republicans] will line up against us and there will be no way of stopping them, we'll lose the filibuster and there will be no way of putting the brake on all sorts of wild legislation, it'll be reconstruction all over again - Lyndon Johnson

 

[JuliefromOhio]

Generalizations or factual comments?

I was born and raised in the Chicago area. Go to the south side sometime, around MLK drive and get back to me. The fact is that area is exactly what I described, an inner city welfare state, with massive amounts of gang violence, rapes, murders, drugs.

There used to be a housing project called Cabrini Green back in the '60s. That's where my sister in law was raised. She got the hell out of there. It's gotten much worse since then.

You have to realize there is a problem before you can fix a problem. That's why Democrats don't fix problems; they only create them.

To most of them, there is no such thing as Islamic terrorism or inner city welfare states. And that's why those problems are worsening.

Americans are finally starting to see it, too. Thank God.

there is no such thing as an "inner city welfare state." you've described an urban area with high crime. that's not a definition of a "welfare state" whatever the hell that's supposed to mean. I know your con talk radio jocks bash black people 24/7, but they leave you sounding ignorant when you use a term that means nothing and when you try to define it, you slip into suggesting inner city black people are ALL criminals.

call in to your favorite con talk radio show and ask them about public assistance. I'm positive they won't be able to tell you that states control public assistance and they won't be able to tell you who is eligible for public assistance and for how long. they just want to stoke their audience's bigotry/racism so you'll feel that you're better than the people you bash. you're not.

 

[BitterPill]

The American Black Muslims do not "blow things up" - they are not accepted by mainstream middle eastern Arab Muslims and youre ignorance is superfluous.

You are obviously an avid follower of Malcolm X and also upset with this country. Are you planning any terrorist attacks?

 

[BitterPill]

The first thing a Republican does when he sees a person, is judge them by the content of their character, exactly what MLK did.

The first thing a Republican does when he sees a person is calculate how rich that person is in relation to himself, the richer naturally taking precedence in the Republican pecking order. Of course, if that person is underage, the first thing that comes to a Republican mind is, "where can I bugger this child in private?"

So it's not always about money for Republicans. Sometimes it's about buggery.

 

[Carlsen]

The Republicans don't have a history of racism.

It was a Democrat president not a Republican who appointed Hugo Black a member of the KKK, to the Supreme Court. It was a Democrat Senate that appointed Robert Byrd and member of the KKK to Senate Majority leader. It was a Democrat Governor that blocked blacks access to schools in Alabama, not a Republican.

It was a Republican president that started the war against slavery. It was a Republican president that introduced the first civil rights act and sent troops to Alabama to allow blacks to attend segregated schools. I was a majority of Republicans that voted for the Civil Rights acts of 1964 and 1965. It was a Republican President who appointed the first Black member of the Supreme Court.

Democrats are just a racist now as they where then, enslaving blacks to welfare to obtain their votes.

I check on a Senator Strom Thurman he is Republican who is racist. He also have a daughter with a black lady.
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/12/opinion/in-america-a-sea-change-on-crime.html

His opposition to integration, which he often attributed to Communism, was the hallmark of his career in Washington until the 1970's. In 1971, he was among the first Southern senators to hire a black aide -- in recognition of increased black voting resulting from the legislation he had fought. From then on, black South Carolinians, like all other residents, benefited from his skills as a pork-barrel politician who took care of the home folks.

.

 

[BitterPill]

I check on a Senator Strom Thurman he is Republican who is racist. He also have a daughter with a black lady.
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/12/opinion/in-america-a-sea-change-on-crime.html



.

The John Birch Society was famous for calling its enemies communist, like Eisenhower:

Buckley’s condemnation effectively banishing the group from the mainstream conservative movement. Welch [the Society founder] had called President Dwight D. Eisenhower a “conscious, dedicated agent of the communist conspiracy” and that the U.S. government was “under operational control of the Communist party.” Buckley argued that such paranoid rantings had no place in the conservative movement or the Republican party.​

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2010/02/farright-john-birch-society-2010/

and so Buckley enjoys a warm place in my heart. Sadly, Buckley died not long ago, and now we are over-run with tea partiers calling their enemies communist.

If that was paranoid then, what is it now?

 

[GreenBean]

The first thing a Republican does when he sees a person is calculate how rich that person is in relation to himself

Americas wealthiest are much more likely to be represented by a Democrat than a Republican. Of the 10 richest House districts, only two have Republican congressmen. Democrats claim the top six, sprinkled along the East and West coasts.

Across the country, Democratic House districts have an average per capita income of $27,893. That's about $1,000 higher than the average income in Republican districts. The difference is relatively small because Democrats also represent a lot of poor districts, putting the average in the middle.

The 10 richest House districts:

___

New York 12

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, Democrat

Per capita income: $75,479

___

California 33

Rep. Henry Waxman, Democrat

Per capita income: $61,273

___

New York 10

Rep. Jerry Nadler, Democrat

Per capita income: $56,138

___

California 18

Rep. Anna Eshoo, Democrat

Per capita income: $ 54,182

___

Connecticut 4

Rep. Jim Himes, Democrat

Per capita income: $50,732

___

Virginia 8

Rep. Jim Moran, Democrat

Per capita income: $50,210

___

New Jersey 7

Rep. Leonard Lance, Republican

Per capita income: $48,556

___

California 12

Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Democrat

Per capita income: $48,523

___

New York 3

Rep. Steve Israel, Democrat

Per capita income: $47,991

___

Virginia 10

Rep. Frank Wolf, Republican

Per capita income: $47,281

___

 

[GreenBean]

I check on a Senator Strom Thurman he is Republican who is racist. He also have a daughter with a black lady.
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/12/opinion/in-america-a-sea-change-on-crime.html



.

Senator Strom Thurman he is Republican

Strom Thurmond died in 2003, Joe Biden delivered his eulogy. He was a Democrat and a Republican - a "Dixiecrat"

So far as his daughter being black- yes this is true her name is Washington Williams, he put her through college, an historically black college in South Carolina and continued to give her financial support most of her adult life.

 

[Sgt Staples]

The first thing a Republican does when he sees a person is calculate how rich that person is in relation to himself, the richer naturally taking precedence in the Republican pecking order. Of course, if that person is underage, the first thing that comes to a Republican mind is, "where can I bugger this child in private?"

So it's not always about money for Republicans. Sometimes it's about buggery.

bu

Where do you get this bullcrap? Republicans are for the working man, Democrats are for he Welfare man.

Democrats WANT people dependent on government so that they will vote Democrat. Republicans want people independent so that they don't have to.

The Democrats record on high energy prices, high food prices, anti efficient economical energy policies and the constant loss of income by the working folks have been the rule for the last 6 years. Those on the dole, however have done quite well under Obama and Reid and Pelosi.

 

[BitterPill]

bu

Where do you get this bullcrap? Republicans are for the working man, Democrats are for he Welfare man.

Democrats WANT people dependent on government so that they will vote Democrat. Republicans want people independent so that they don't have to.

The Democrats record on high energy prices, high food prices, anti efficient economical energy policies and the constant loss of income by the working folks have been the rule for the last 6 years. Those on the dole, however have done quite well under Obama and Reid and Pelosi.

I was mocking you. Perhaps you think you're the only person around here who can spin fantastic tales and not get called on it.