freyasman
Senator
They're mostly busybodies; they always have to have their nose in other folk's business, all the time.It seems they are the ones who have mental issues
They're mostly busybodies; they always have to have their nose in other folk's business, all the time.It seems they are the ones who have mental issues
Of course it does. Who said otherwise? Did I say otherwise? The examples in my case being a reply to the point....we enforce it we don't.Fair enough. But that is kind of my point.
Binary.
I know. Hence the problem. Our legal system is not binary. It makes finer distinctions.
And that's the point.
That is not reasonableMaybe for some, though I'd doubt for most. Gun laws are well Intentioned, it's the enforcement and resulting issues that are the problem.
The worst part about red flag laws or making semiautos a NFA is the amount of victimless crime felons you will create. Some willfully, others not close to willfully. The only reasonable solution to avoiding that problem is to confiscate all weapons in a door to door manner.
I said reasonable solution, as in reasonable solution to the perceived problem. It's the end game, all other options wont work.That is not reasonable
Gun control requires gun violence to enforce.Maybe for some, though I'd doubt for most. Gun laws are well Intentioned, it's the enforcement and resulting issues that are the problem.
The worst part about red flag laws or making semiautos a NFA is the amount of victimless crime felons you will create. Some willfully, others not close to willfully. The only reasonable solution to avoiding that problem is to confiscate all weapons in a door to door manner.
Where are these meltdowns you predicted?Yikes, there will be some con meltdowns over this one...lol.
It's neither applicable or reasonableI said reasonable solution, as in reasonable solution to the perceived problem. It's the end game, all other options wont work.
I in no way suggested its applicable. So you wont get an arguement from me on your point.
If I thought for a moment you were telling the truth, perhaps nothing. Unfortunately your track record here doesn't allow me to trust you.How is this making a law abiding citizen a victim. I am not even saying the right to own a semi automatic weapon should be taken away. I am just saying we need to inject a bit more responsibility into the system where people are allowed to have guns.
What is wrong with that ?
That's the entire goal of the anti-civil rights nutters like the thread author. Good thing most of us can spot it so easily.Except for criminals, of course. They don't obey the laws and there will always be firearms available on the black market, making law abiding citizens bigger victims than they are now.
Besides, the leftist push to disarm Americans isn't about stopping the killing. It's about taking permanent control of the country where dissidents will be killed, en mass.
Interesting analogy. Thank you. Just how many speeders get away with it? Answer: MILLIONS DAILY. Most ticket recipients resent the ticket and never change their ways. So it will be with illegal guns. It will not diminish the number of shootings.That doesn't mean we shouldn't establish and enforce them
We still enforce the speed limit even though people speed on the highway often.
California's "ballot harvesting" scheme stole those Congressional seats. Everybody knows it.My neighbors are in the Los Angeles area. They thoroughly rejected your leader and his party and in fact kicked all but 2 of them out of the entire 55 federally elected congressional and senate seats in the state in the last election. And one of the 2 who weren't kicked out is going to prison for misuse of campaign contributions.
You spoke too soon. See @SoccerMom. LOLWhere are these meltdowns you predicted?
"Grow up" being the key phrase of course. Democrats are children, hence their stupidity and tendencies towards violence.He was a Democrat and head of the actor's union before he turned to the dark side and became a Republican.
It's sad to see them grow up and turn bad.
Every totalitarian leftist regime in history disagrees with you. Civilian disarmament was a necessary step for the genocide that always follows.Aka a bit more state control. And the bourgeois left may push it as part of their one-two punch, but it will be the right that will as always benefit from the masses being politically and literally disarmed.
Well, tell your Dem rep to get the ball rolling. see if this passes muster.Easy peasy ... can be done quick fast ...
Lets "git erT done" republicans ... lets go!!
How would that have stopped either of the geeks last weekend?How is this making a law abiding citizen a victim. I am not even saying the right to own a semi automatic weapon should be taken away. I am just saying we need to inject a bit more responsibility into the system where people are allowed to have guns.
What is wrong with that ?
Are you saying we should "SEND THEM BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM"?You mean the same "real Americans" who don't reject working with Russia to overthrow our govt. ?
Screw em.
Who needs them ?