Spamature
President
Yeah, and you are what you eat. But that does not mean we should get rid of the food inspectors.Your personal safety is your personal individual responsibility.
There..... problem solved.
Yeah, and you are what you eat. But that does not mean we should get rid of the food inspectors.Your personal safety is your personal individual responsibility.
There..... problem solved.
Who need medical school when you have your gut instincts, eh ?Yep.
The simplest answer to mass shootings is no more gun free zones.Treat semi automatic weapons under the law as we do automatic weapons.
A special license from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) is required to manufacture, sell, and own any of these items, without exception.
Wait, the people on Schinder's list survived didn't they. (I never really watch the whole movie), But in Thunder Dome it 2 men enter 1 man leaves. That's only a 50/50 chance and you still might die from your injuries anyway.Better than living in Schindler's List.
Sadly, American also aren't responsible enough to have no guns either. I am offering a happy compromise.Simple....
Ban all guns.
Americans are not responsible enough to own one or more.
Having a gun does not mean that you won't be shot by one. In fact it increases the chances that you will.The simplest answer to mass shootings is no more gun free zones.
It's harder to kill someone when the democrats don't leave them defenseless.
Reality begs to differ .No it would leave all the guns in the hands of the sane
Quite the opposite actually. The increase in guns has made us all 20% safer give or take. Mass shooters have one thing in common, they target places that don't allow guns. So by not allowing guns, democrats are inviting mass shooters.Having a gun does not mean that you won't be shot by one. In fact it increases the chances that you will.
I've seen examples of leftist intelligence not very muchReality begs to differ .
Treat medical care like a commodity and let the market weed out the bad ones.Who need medical school when you have your gut instincts, eh ?
There are at least 100 million gun owners in America (actually it's more like twice that, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was more), and yet we only have about 11000 murders a year with firearms, committed almost entirely by professional criminals heavily involved in the drug trade, and the gang culture, and highly concentrated in a few areas. Almost all of these folks are already prohibited by law from possessing guns.Simple....
Ban all guns.
Americans are not responsible enough to own one or more.
As a general rule I always lean to the solution that allows for the maximum amount of freedom. As long as an issue doesnt cause a massive amount of damage to our society as a whole, no solution is required that would restrict a person's freedom.And crowds are ripe for being murdered. Pick your poison.
America has the gun problem. Not me.There are at least 100 million gun owners in America (actually it's more like twice that, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was more), and yet we only have about 11000 murders a year with firearms, committed almost entirely by professional criminals heavily involved in the drug trade, and the gang culture, and highly concentrated in a few areas. Almost all of these folks are already prohibited by law from possessing guns.
Seems to me like the average American gun owner is very responsible.
And it seems to me like you are extremely ignorant and parroting stupidity rather than even attempting to understand the problem you claim to want to solve.
I actually never watched it either.Wait, the people on Schinder's list survived didn't they. (I never really watch the whole movie), But in Thunder Dome it 2 men enter 1 man leaves. That's only a 50/50 chance and you still might die from your injuries anyway.
Well it looked really depressing.Deleted
Gun control requires gun violence to enforce.
Even if only 1% of gun owners fight back rather than submit, that will be 100 times the violence they claim to be trying to prevent.
No. We're not going to do that.
The only folks who think it's a problem that people are armed, are people who are considering a course of action for which they can expect to be shot.America has the gun problem. Not me.
We have never had a firearms debate; we have just had demand after demand.I agree whole heartedly. My point is it's the end game of the firearms debate. Any other solution simply wont work.
I didn’t. I don’t know how to get you to comprehend what I wrote, but that is not what I said. Once again:You are the one that said democrats couldn't handle capitalism
I SAID
YOU FOLLOWED UP WITH
AND MY FOLLOW UP
So why did you say democrats can't handle capitalism and now change?