New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The simplest answer to mass shootings.

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
I didn’t. I don’t know how to get you to comprehend what I wrote, but that is not what I said. Once again:

You said Democrats are dangerous. I said if you think so then we need to get rid of the capitalist system that gives the Democratic Party its power. That was not saying Democrats can’t handle capitalism, it was saying the Democratic Party can ONLY handle capitalism, and getting rid of capitalism would defang them.
Dude you said democrats can't handle capitalism Because I said democrats are dangerous and you followed up with your get rid of capitalism crap.
 
I didn’t. I don’t know how to get you to comprehend what I wrote, but that is not what I said. Once again:

You said Democrats are dangerous. I said if you think so then we need to get rid of the capitalist system that gives the Democratic Party its power. That was not saying Democrats can’t handle capitalism, it was saying the Democratic Party can ONLY handle capitalism, and getting rid of capitalism would defang them.
That would never work. The only thing in human history that has killed more people than socialism is communism.
 

Spamature

President
Quite the opposite actually. The increase in guns has made us all 20% safer give or take. Mass shooters have one thing in common, they target places that don't allow guns. So by not allowing guns, democrats are inviting mass shooters.

Republicans have been trying to tell you this for decades and you're too stubborn to listen. Those shootings are on the democrats.

In 2018, an editorial in the International Journal of Epidemiology proposed that epidemiologists, too, could play an important role in reducing gun violence in the US, if they could simply get at the data. After all, the authors pointed out, just owning a gun is strongly associated with injury and death by firearm—suicide, homicide, and accident.


https://www.wired.com/story/how-to-reduce-gun-violence-ask-some-scientists/
 

Spamature

President
As a general rule I always lean to the solution that allows for the maximum amount of freedom. As long as an issue doesnt cause a massive amount of damage to our society as a whole, no solution is required that would restrict a person's freedom.

I cant say I like the end result, mass shootings and mass killings, but those have a very minimal affect on our society as a whole. They are certainly devastating to those directly involved, and make my stomach sick when they occur. But a further restriction on the peoples constitutional right cant been seen as acceptable.
When someone is murders it effects that person and all the people around them. You get sick from afar. All those people at the funeral get hit up close, thousands and thousands, thousands of times a year.

You aren't losing a right. You're gaining an the overdue responsibility that comes with maintaining a license. Rights do not mean freedom from responsibility.
 

freyasman

Senator
Wait ? You want people to go to untrained doctors and be maimed and killed in order to weed out the bad untrained doctors ?

You first.
Been there, done that.
How do you think the military trains it's medical personnel? It's pretty [Unwelcome language removed] hard on us soldiers, but by the time their military commitment is up, military doctors have usually learned quite a bit. And their med school has been paid for.
 

freyasman

Senator
When someone is murders it effects that person and all the people around them. You get sick from afar. All those people at the funeral get hit up close, thousands and thousands, thousands of times a year.

You aren't losing a right. You're gaining an the overdue responsibility that comes with maintaining a license. Rights do not mean freedom from responsibility.
Nonsense. You're abdicating your own responsibility.
 
Wait ? You want people to go to untrained doctors and be maimed and killed in order to weed out the bad untrained doctors ?

You first.
You were referring to licensing, not training. Big difference. I'll bet even you're licensed to do something. And as we both know, that's not saying very much.
 

Spamature

President
Been there, done that.
How do you think the military trains it's medical personnel? It's pretty [Unwelcome language removed] hard on us soldiers, but by the time their military commitment is up, military doctors have usually learned quite a bit. And their med school has been paid for.
I let a doctor do her first unsupervised upper gi endoscopy on me. It ended with me throwing up blood.

Never again.

F' untrained rookies.
 

EatTheRich

President
Dude you said democrats can't handle capitalism Because I said democrats are dangerous and you followed up with your get rid of capitalism crap.
Yes. Because capitalism gives the “dangerous” Democratic Party its power. You are complaining about a consequence of the capitalist system when you complain about a capitalist political party like the Democratic Party.
 

EatTheRich

President
That would never work. The only thing in human history that has killed more people than socialism is communism.
Capitalism kills more people every 7 years than the most wildly inflated estimates have attributed to socialism/communism, and that is in “normal” (not world war or depression) times.
 
Top