As a general rule I always lean to the solution that allows for the maximum amount of freedom. As long as an issue doesnt cause a massive amount of damage to our society as a whole, no solution is required that would restrict a person's freedom.
I cant say I like the end result, mass shootings and mass killings, but those have a very minimal affect on our society as a whole. They are certainly devastating to those directly involved, and make my stomach sick when they occur. But a further restriction on the peoples constitutional right cant been seen as acceptable.