Inquisitor
Council Member
Per the virtue of selfish, per man's manifest evolutionary destiny, per might makes right, and such, I love and relish the thought of taking, stealing, plundering the money and resources from whom so ever I can, particulariy as much is allowed per the law, lest I risk myself unnecessarily on illegal investures.
Contrary to the quaint and archaic moral sympathies and notions of the naïve, the childish, the slave class, the weakling, he has no "right" to anything whatsoever, but what comes out of the barrel of a gun or the hilt of a knife, or what is in his evolutionary agency, or lack thereof, to so procure by force.
In every historical period, it has been completely evolutionarily natural and viable for a man to plunder from a comparative weaking, to dominate him, to seize his wives and concubiines - to own him as a slave, to weak and evolutionarily inept to defend himself without cowering, wimpering, or appealing to his "sky daddy" in the form of law or quaint, and childish notions of morality, rights and what not.
Those evolutionarily successful enough, to successfully steal, rape, pillage, plunder, dominate, crush, destroy, annihilate their enemies and inept weaklings, whether by the barrel of a gun, the hilt of a knife, the pen or or something else mightier than the sword, of course win on evolution's front, the less successful being not but defectives, refuse, and other worthless little aberrations, too weak to defend themselves, serving only the evolutionary purpose of being leech off of, used, abused, cast aside like an old glove, by the more evolutionarily apt, fluid, dynamic, and dominant, not bothered by quaint moral sentiments, or appeals to non-existent sky daddies or their de-facto equivalents to save them, punish their so-called "wrongdoer", or anything else of the sword.
Might is right, unless you posses a margin of might, you lack anything resembling a margin of right, now survive on your own accord, or die like the vermin you are. Mhmm
Contrary to the quaint and archaic moral sympathies and notions of the naïve, the childish, the slave class, the weakling, he has no "right" to anything whatsoever, but what comes out of the barrel of a gun or the hilt of a knife, or what is in his evolutionary agency, or lack thereof, to so procure by force.
In every historical period, it has been completely evolutionarily natural and viable for a man to plunder from a comparative weaking, to dominate him, to seize his wives and concubiines - to own him as a slave, to weak and evolutionarily inept to defend himself without cowering, wimpering, or appealing to his "sky daddy" in the form of law or quaint, and childish notions of morality, rights and what not.
Those evolutionarily successful enough, to successfully steal, rape, pillage, plunder, dominate, crush, destroy, annihilate their enemies and inept weaklings, whether by the barrel of a gun, the hilt of a knife, the pen or or something else mightier than the sword, of course win on evolution's front, the less successful being not but defectives, refuse, and other worthless little aberrations, too weak to defend themselves, serving only the evolutionary purpose of being leech off of, used, abused, cast aside like an old glove, by the more evolutionarily apt, fluid, dynamic, and dominant, not bothered by quaint moral sentiments, or appeals to non-existent sky daddies or their de-facto equivalents to save them, punish their so-called "wrongdoer", or anything else of the sword.
Might is right, unless you posses a margin of might, you lack anything resembling a margin of right, now survive on your own accord, or die like the vermin you are. Mhmm