Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
And there you have it, the only immigration policy the left actually supports is…none.Take the cap completely off legal immigration.
And there you have it, the only immigration policy the left actually supports is…none.Take the cap completely off legal immigration.
There’s nothing wasteful about an investment that repairs a problem that would be much costlier if ignored.It is rather quaint that you think you will be believed when you object to the wall on fiscal grounds. But after trillions in wasteful democratic agenda spending on "sustainable" energy, subsidized transportation schemes and "economic development" in third world shit holes, no one believe for an instant that your fiscal probity leads you to oppose Trump's efforts to build a wall. It is only and always because the wall will actually largely end illegal immigration that you people are against it - it's as plain as the nose on your face. Open borders and unchecked immigration is a key ingredient to achieving the Marxist/socialist future that is the left's "vanity" project...
His proposal would reduce illegal immigration to zero. According to your logic, we can conclude that if you oppose it it’s because your agenda is unchecked illegal immigration.And there you have it, the only immigration policy the left actually supports is…none.
Yes, the answer is to make all "illegal" immigration…legal. Problem solved, right? We can feed them with "the rich," am I right?His proposal would reduce illegal immigration to zero. According to your logic, we can conclude that if you oppose it it’s because your agenda is unchecked illegal immigration.
Which is why, absent repeal of the left's welfare state, a wall is the least bad option for controlling immigration by tens of millions of third world peasants...There’s nothing wasteful about an investment that repairs a problem that would be much costlier if ignored.
Problem is, Trump is the greatest president of all time. He has given us the greatest economy of all time. There's no logical reason for him to resign.Democrats won't get re-elected if they vote for a wall, Republicans can't get re-elected if they vote against a wall. So you need a win-win situation where everyone gets re-elected.
The only thing that would that would get Democrats re-elected if they voted for a wall?
A Trump Resignation.
Try offering a Trump resignation letter for a wall. It might break the deadlock.
That's not necessarily true."There’s nothing wasteful about an investment that repairs a problem that would be much costlier if ignored." ER #82
What is your plan for feeding them while blocking them from availing themselves of free-market competition for labor?Yes, the answer is to make all "illegal" immigration…legal. Problem solved, right? We can feed them with "the rich," am I right?
Nope, third world poverty is the problem that would be much costlier if ignored. A wall will not protect the U.S. from the hordes of refugees climate change will send swarming in.Which is why, absent repeal of the left's welfare state, a wall is the least bad option for controlling immigration by tens of millions of third world peasants...
Let them eat the rich...What is your plan for feeding them while blocking them from availing themselves of free-market competition for labor?
So we have no choice but to acquiesce to global communism? Alrighty then...Nope, third world poverty is the problem that would be much costlier if ignored. A wall will not protect the U.S. from the hordes of refugees climate change will send swarming in.
too late for zero immigrationHis proposal would reduce illegal immigration to zero. According to your logic, we can conclude that if you oppose it it’s because your agenda is unchecked illegal immigration.
Let them eat the rich...
History will certainly have its way ... there is an alternative to communism, namely the global nuclear devastation that is the only future capitalism can prepare.So we have no choice but to acquiesce to global communism? Alrighty then...
Communists don't covet nukes? That is absurd...History will certainly have its way ... there is an alternative to communism, namely the global nuclear devastation that is the only future capitalism can prepare.
I never knew the USSR & Communist China - that slaughtered 80 million of their own people were White Male Christians. Wow.1. Funny, because the introduction of Christianity and white male capitalists’ values to the Americas coincided with the bloodiest genocide in history.
- Trump lost the vote, but won the presidency. And now with his presidency more than half over Trump's popularity drags along still under 50%. Has President Trump's popularity ever reached 50%?
Ever?
As well respected as you are madame congressman, we'll need you to quote and link at least one authoritative study. It does make some sense to take a cum average."Yes, yesterday." NC #97
Do you consider that likely?"By the way, is Pelosi taking down the wall on California's southern border yet ?" NC
A nuclear weapon is a tool, it can be used to terrorize people or to deter aggression. But communism undermines the objective basis of violence which is hierarchical organization of society, while capitalism can lead to no possible future other than a more warlike one.Communists don't covet nukes? That is absurd...
1. That number is absurd, unless you count every person who died of any cause.I never knew the USSR & Communist China - that slaughtered 80 million of their own people were White Male Christians. Wow.