What you say, is absolutely true. But....I always figured the "double taxed" whine, was bullshit in any case. How many times is that dollar I just bought gas with, taxed? And hey....my house has been taxed 25 times now!It goes that the money invested has already been taxed but it is only the profit from the investment, not the money invested, that is taxed.
BS! What is being referred to is the FACT that this profit is taxed once as earned by the corporation and AGAIN when paid out to the shareholders. THAT'S double taxation. Sure it is "legal" and yes it happens all the time (like when my state taxes me on my income and again when I spend it). No one is arguing that it doesn't happen elsewhere, just that you leftists at least acknowledge that it is happening with investment income and stop all this rubbish about "the rich" paying so much less than everybody else. Is THAT too much to ask?It goes that the money invested has already been taxed but it is only the profit from the investment, not the money invested, that is taxed.
Who owns the corporation and if the corporate tax disappeared who would get the money?It's taxed as income to the corp when they receive it. It's taxed as income to the shareholders when they receive their "share". Each entity receives it as income, and is taxed once. The corp pays the shareholders a percentage of their net. To be "double taxed" it would have to be taxed twice to the same entity. That doesn't happen.
No. First much investment income doesn't come from corporate dividends. Much comes from investing in certificates of deposit or bonds, purchase and sale of stocks, real estate, etc. Romney and individuals like him may be unusual that to some extent he is the corporation but they incorporate in large part to avoid paying their earning at income tax rates. So you are free to invest where you wish but let me ask you then, if I lend you money to go into business and you then pay me back with interest out of your after tax profits are you saying I shouldn't pay on the money I made from investing in you because you are a tax payer too? Why not extend the logic if it is all about double taxation? Why should anyone that makes a profit from selling me something pay taxes as I have already paid taxes once on the money I pay them with and from which they make their profit? The reason is I am not you and you are not me, so our money and taxes aren't the same, and, my friend, even if you think they are people, neither are corporations.BS! What is being referred to is the FACT that this profit is taxed once as earned by the corporation and AGAIN when paid out to the shareholders. THAT'S double taxation. Sure it is "legal" and yes it happens all the time (like when my state taxes me on my income and again when I spend it). No one is arguing that it doesn't happen elsewhere, just that you leftists at least acknowledge that it is happening with investment income and stop all this rubbish about "the rich" paying so much less than everybody else. Is THAT too much to ask?
This is what Obama gave http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/all-about-the-obamas-charitable-giving/Romney gave some 4 million dollars to charity. Do you know how much Obama gave?
Mostly, the CEO and other executives.Who owns the corporation and if the corporate tax disappeared who would get the money?
If you said you were lying then we might have a logical dilemma.That's not a lie.
Romney gave some 4 million dollars to charity. Do you know how much Obama gave?
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/18/obama-tax-return-shows-income-down/In 2010 Obama paid 26% tax and donated 14% of his income to charity, not including the Nobel money, which he donated 100% to charity. Every Winger on this board has asked the same freaking question, it gets tiresome answering it time after time. Do you not rerad any of the threads on the board?
Mr. Obama and his wife, Michelle, on Monday reported an adjusted gross income of $1,728,096 for 2010, down from $5.5 million in 2009. Most of their income came from sales of his books “Dreams From My Father” and “The Audacity of Hope.” The Obamas paid $453,770 in federal taxes, for an effective tax rate of just over 26 percent; the top individual tax rate is 35 percent.
The Obamas donated $245,075 — 14.2 percent of their income before tax deductions and exemptions — to 36 charities. According to the White House, more than half went to the couple’s favorite charity, the Fisher House Foundation, which benefits families of fallen and disabled soldiers; it gets all proceeds of Mr. Obama’s children’s book, “Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters,” which was published late last year.
Separately, the Obamas paid $51,568 in state income taxes to Illinois.
A) You can't have a dividend unless you invested in a profit making (and therefor tax paying) business. You can have a capital gain if you invest in a government bond or a CD but that would be the exception, not the rule. The vast majority of capital gains is generated by owning tax paying assets (rental real estate, businesses, etc,).No. First much investment income doesn't come from corporate dividends. Much comes from investing in certificates of deposit or bonds, purchase and sale of stocks, real estate, etc. Romney and individuals like him may be unusual that to some extent he is the corporation but they incorporate in large part to avoid paying their earning at income tax rates. So you are free to invest where you wish but let me ask you then, if I lend you money to go into business and you then pay me back with interest out of your after tax profits are you saying I shouldn't pay on the money I made from investing in you because you are a tax payer too? Why not extend the logic if it is all about double taxation? Why should anyone that makes a profit from selling me something pay taxes as I have already paid taxes once on the money I pay them with and from which they make their profit? The reason is I am not you and you are not me, so our money and taxes aren't the same, and, my friend, even if you think they are people, neither are corporations.
So the owners will get the money (including the CEO and other executives who own stock).Mostly, the CEO and other executives.
I guess one has to be smarter than a slug to understand this concept.If you said you were lying then we might have a logical dilemma.