EatTheRich
President
The “climate pause” never actually happened.Does anyone actually listen to the IPCC anymore? I mean since the climate pause when CO2 skyrocketed proving that CO2 is not causing warming?
The “climate pause” never actually happened.Does anyone actually listen to the IPCC anymore? I mean since the climate pause when CO2 skyrocketed proving that CO2 is not causing warming?
China has drastically reduced GHG emissions.Certainly China is not listening.
Sorry kid she said it and she meant it, and there is actually a very simple reason for what she said, no matter how strange it might seem to others, which is that she is a schizophrenic.She did not say the Earth was ending as you reported. She used a metaphor.
And, no, the nuke protesters were not proven right. Even without global warming, nuclear has been far less harmful than fossil fuels. And an accident on Chernobyl’s scale is unlikely to ever happen again.
Correct because climate change is a permanent part of the Earths dynamic equilibrium for over 5 billion years.The “climate pause” never actually happened.
Is that why people can't breath in Beijing?China has drastically reduced GHG emissions.
Chernobyl was based on a design that was already obsolete when it was built. Modern plants have containment shells, for one thing.Sorry kid she said it and she meant it, and there is actually a very simple reason for what she said, no matter how strange it might seem to others, which is that she is a schizophrenic.
You can not from a logical perspective provide even one reason why another meltdown can not occur. Actually a far smaller meltdown than Chernobyl in a more populated area could be far more catastrophic then Chernobyl was. But in your mind since nuclear power does not emit CO2 it's perfectly safe...……. Shit Oyster Creek in NJ is going to take 60 years to close fully.
You are equivocating on the meaning of “climate change.” Most colloquial use of it today refers to the abrupt alteration of long-standing climate patterns due to very rapid global warming. Not at all the same as the climate changing due to variability caused by effects manifested over much longer time scales or by the chaotic effects of tiny variations.Correct because climate change is a permanent part of the Earths dynamic equilibrium for over 5 billion years.
I knew you would see it my way.
When by the way was the time when climate change is known to have not been happening?
Next
No. China still burns a lot of coal. It’s just that their coal combustion has peaked even as their population as economy continue to grow.Is that why people can't breath in Beijing?
Ant the half life of spent nuclear fuel is only 159200 years...... Which technically is of no consequence since the dumokrappic party has revealed that the World is ending in 11 years and some days anyway.Chernobyl was based on a design that was already obsolete when it was built. Modern plants have containment shells, for one thing.
Lol, the only long standing climate pattern is the massive warming trend that ended the ice age and has continued into the present interglacial.You are equivocating on the meaning of “climate change.” Most colloquial use of it today refers to the abrupt alteration of long-standing climate patterns due to very rapid global warming. Not at all the same as the climate changing due to variability caused by effects manifested over much longer time scales or by the chaotic effects of tiny variations.
Kid you are so dysfunctional that you are [Unwelcome language removed] up on the meanings of yes and no.No. China still burns a lot of coal. It’s just that their coal combustion has peaked even as their population as economy continue to grow.
Someone is living between your ears]1. The Earth is not cooling over any statistically significant period of time.
You've already lost that argument. The science has spoken. I have given you several credible links, something you aren't accustomed to.
2. The Heartland Institute folks are literally paid shills.
But not on the payroll of George Soros, which gives Heartland more credibility than your hacks.
3. Galileo based his opposition to a faith-based consensus on evidence. You are basing your opposition to an evidence-based consensus on unsupported assertions and conspiracy theories.
Once again, you lost a point and you try to change the subject. Galileo was the father of modern physics and the "Scientific Method." And it was faith-based opposition to his SCIENCE that came from government. His views were anything but faith based. (You REALLY need to do some reading. You're REALLY off in left field on this one, and for a loon like you that's really saying something.)
4. The IPCC summarizes the top research in the leading peer-reviewed journals. Their firm position that human activity is causing warming reflects the firm position of the best scientists.
In other words, they read the OPINIONS of fellow hacks, who likewise depend on flawed computer models and cash checks written by George Soros. And somehow you think that gives them any credibility? You extremist lefties aren't impressing anyone with that term "Peer reviewed." It has no real credibility. It just means more idiots agree with certain idiots.
5. Literally every major scientific body in the world agrees. Soros doesn’t have enough money to buy off all those people who devoted their lives to science.
He doesn't have to. And he hasn't been able to buy off anyone who has devoted his/her life to science. No REAL scientist is buying this global warming/climate change bullshit. Most REAL scientists disagree with these fairy tales.
And non-radioactive waste never turns safe. The elements with the highest half-lives are the most stable and least dangerous ones, the sort that direct exposure to every day of your life might raise your risk of cancer by 1/10000.Ant the half life of spent nuclear fuel is only 159200 years...... Which technically is of no consequence since the dumokrappic party has revealed that the World is ending in 11 years and some days anyway.
So would you rather breath CO2 or Plutonium dust? Perhaps you can try both then get back to me
Again if a fossil fuel power plant blows up you can walk thru the smoke if a nuke plant blows up you can actually do the same thing, just dont expect to have any hair or bone marrow when you get out.And non-radioactive waste never turns safe. The elements with the highest half-lives are the most stable and least dangerous ones, the sort that direct exposure to every day of your life might raise your risk of cancer by 1/10000.
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warmingYes they were. And all the best independent minds have proven they were wrong. NONE of their idiotic predictions have materialized. In this arena, it's not good enough to have good intentions. One has to be held accountable.
More people are working good jobs now than at any other time in history. Food stamp use is at a historic LOW.
Sure you have, like when you claimed that “if something is not done by the year 2000, entire nations could be wiped from the face of the Earth” meant “entire nations could be wiped from the face of the Earth by the year 2000 if something is not done.” Or that more than a minority of scientists were projecting global cooling in the 1970s.I haven't misrepresented ANY of the nonsense from these hacks to claim to be scientists and journalists.
You’re the one fabricating a conspiracy of pure evil by a guy who just so happens to be Jewish. I’m just pointing out that you’re not above making anti-Semitic appeals to justify your attacks on science.But thanks for being honest and admitting you hate Jews.
No climate model has ever predicted agw. Furthermore no climate model has ever predicted the climate, just weather and like you enjoy saying climate is not weatherhttps://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming
Low-wage jobs are the fastest-growing, and food stamp cutoffs just mean that those low-wage workers don’t have enough to feed their children.
Sure you have, like when you claimed that “if something is not done by the year 2000, entire nations could be wiped from the face of the Earth” meant “entire nations could be wiped from the face of the Earth by the year 2000 if something is not done.” Or that more than a minority of scientists were projecting global cooling in the 1970s.
You’re the one fabricating a conspiracy of pure evil by a guy who just so happens to be Jewish. I’m just pointing out that you’re not above making anti-Semitic appeals to justify your attacks on science.
There are hordes of people living between my ears. The human brain is amazing, that way. It's not as bad for me as it is for the idiot liberals here. At least I'm right.Someone is living between your ears
What exactly do you expect to teach the idiot liberals?There are hordes of people living between my ears. The human brain is amazing, that way. It's not as bad for me as it is for the idiot liberals here. At least I'm right.