New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Theresa May shows why women unsuited as leaders. Collapses in tears after resigning

EatTheRich

President
Suggestion: Stop smoking whatever it is you're smoking. Whites are being genocided in S. Africa and there are roughly 950,o00,000,000,000 references, articles, photos, videos, quotes, and testimonies proving it.


That the hiring manager told me I was denied the job because I was White proves I was denied the job because I was White.


Let's go slowly:
s-u-p-e-r-i-o-r-i-t-y
c-h-a-r-a-c-t-e-r-is-t-i-c-s
Do you see how those two words aren't the same? They have very different meanings.
"Rational" and "irrational" have very different meanings, too.


"Better suited for a given job" and "superiority" have very different meanings.
"Nonsensical" and "sensible" also have very different meanings.
"Reality" and "fantasy" have different meanings, too.


False. Something widely known in the scientific and lay communities.


No.


I've read Mein Kampf and I can assure you that National Socialism supports only 2 of those things: nationalism and anti-communism. Both of those things are positive goods. The other things you mentioned are things you made up. I'm a National Socialist. You're a communist. National Socialists know things about National Socialism. Communists lie.


NS was put into practice only once. Based on that, everything you said is wrong. Educate yourself; you might start with some of the many pieces of information I've posted, including in this thread. When NS is put into practice again, we'll see how it plays out in practice.


Yup, saying that home rule = White supremacist rule is, indeed, a joke.
So you're smoking the same stuff as ETR then?


Nice. Now look at images of "Nazi Germany" before the war. It was great.
Suggestion: Watch "The Greatest Story Never Told" and "Hellstorm" documentaries. Both are available online.


No, Affirmative Action permits people like you to deny people a job because of their skin color.


And you were answered. Multiple times, in fact. You refuse to accept be answer, presumably because it doesn't suit your ideological prejudices. Que sara sara.
Whites are 8% of S. Africa’s population but own 73% of the land.

What “hiring manager” told you you were denied a job because you were white? Was the job playing a Black person in a movie?

Race categories are as arbitrary as astrological signs for attributing distribution of skill, talent, or capability, other than the social capability to benefit from race discrimination.

“The black-haired Jewish youth lies in wait for hours on end, satanically glaring at and spying on the unsuspicious girl whom he plans to seduce, adulterating her blood and removing her from the bosom of her own people. The Jew uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations of a subjugated people. In his systematic efforts to ruin girls and women he strives to break down the last barriers of discrimination between him and other peoples. The Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate. For as long as a people remain racially pure and are conscious of the treasure of their blood, they can never be overcome by the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew become master of any people except a bastardized people.”-Adolf Hitler

Sure sounds like race hatred to me
 

EatTheRich

President
Suggestion: Stop smoking whatever it is you're smoking. Whites are being genocided in S. Africa and there are roughly 950,o00,000,000,000 references, articles, photos, videos, quotes, and testimonies proving it.


That the hiring manager told me I was denied the job because I was White proves I was denied the job because I was White.


Let's go slowly:
s-u-p-e-r-i-o-r-i-t-y
c-h-a-r-a-c-t-e-r-is-t-i-c-s
Do you see how those two words aren't the same? They have very different meanings.
"Rational" and "irrational" have very different meanings, too.


"Better suited for a given job" and "superiority" have very different meanings.
"Nonsensical" and "sensible" also have very different meanings.
"Reality" and "fantasy" have different meanings, too.


False. Something widely known in the scientific and lay communities.


No.


I've read Mein Kampf and I can assure you that National Socialism supports only 2 of those things: nationalism and anti-communism. Both of those things are positive goods. The other things you mentioned are things you made up. I'm a National Socialist. You're a communist. National Socialists know things about National Socialism. Communists lie.


NS was put into practice only once. Based on that, everything you said is wrong. Educate yourself; you might start with some of the many pieces of information I've posted, including in this thread. When NS is put into practice again, we'll see how it plays out in practice.


Yup, saying that home rule = White supremacist rule is, indeed, a joke.
So you're smoking the same stuff as ETR then?


Nice. Now look at images of "Nazi Germany" before the war. It was great.
Suggestion: Watch "The Greatest Story Never Told" and "Hellstorm" documentaries. Both are available online.


No, Affirmative Action permits people like you to deny people a job because of their skin color.


And you were answered. Multiple times, in fact. You refuse to accept be answer, presumably because it doesn't suit your ideological prejudices. Que sara sara.
Also, how is any of what I said untrue? “National Socialism” in Germany ... which was not too unlike fascism anywhere ... led to mass poverty, statism, a reinforced patriarchy, persecution of minorities, and cultural stagnation.
 
Whites are 8% of S. Africa’s population but own 73% of the land.

What “hiring manager” told you you were denied a job because you were white? Was the job playing a Black person in a movie?

Race categories are as arbitrary as astrological signs for attributing distribution of skill, talent, or capability, other than the social capability to benefit from race discrimination.

“The black-haired Jewish youth lies in wait for hours on end, satanically glaring at and spying on the unsuspicious girl whom he plans to seduce, adulterating her blood and removing her from the bosom of her own people. The Jew uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations of a subjugated people. In his systematic efforts to ruin girls and women he strives to break down the last barriers of discrimination between him and other peoples. The Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate. For as long as a people remain racially pure and are conscious of the treasure of their blood, they can never be overcome by the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew become master of any people except a bastardized people.”-Adolf Hitler

Sure sounds like race hatred to me
Hitler wrote that in 1924. A time when interracial marriage was so joyously celebrated in the USofA, when the Black man and woman were held in such high esteem that American parents wished nothing better for their children than that they should marry a black person - wasn't it EatTheRich?

Of the Jewish betrayal of the German people after they had generously opened their doors to those fleeing oppression we have spoken many times - and now 'The domain of the Weimar Republic is now the whole Planet' Prof R Dommergue - and look what is happening in Europe. Complaining about what is happening is not racists EatTheRich - it is, as it was, defensive.

Of South African wealth - if it is 73% of land it is 73% of the worked land not the land as a whole --- Land which has been worked by their families for 300 years. And we know what happened when Rhodesia became Zimbabwe under the same circumstance - The Zulu are standing with the White farmers now in SA btw - and farmers are not the richest people in SA. It is the mines which yield wealth there.
 
Last edited:
The intent in one case is to discourage anyone besides whites from applying, in the other case it is to encourage others in addition to whites to apply.
Twist away, twist away. It is not to encourage others in addition to whites, it is to specifically discriminate against whites applying for a post or whatever the ad was for.

Does it matter? Yes, where equality under the law stands, it does.
 
Also, how is any of what I said untrue? “National Socialism” in Germany ... which was not too unlike fascism anywhere ... led to mass poverty, statism, a reinforced patriarchy, persecution of minorities, and cultural stagnation.
What an enormous and blatant lie - National Socialism worked and worked incredibly well. It was the perfect solution for Germany's, and possibly Europes, woes, at that time. It bought a renewed feeling of self worth and innocent happiness, to a broken people, with it. It was hailed, the world over, as an economic miracle with everyone of any importance clambering for a place at Hitler's table - but National Socialism could only work in times of peace which is what Hitler was pleading for before and all the way through WWII. https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html

After WWII, as a ps, the UK adopted it - for what was the Welfare State if not National Socialism?

The thing to remember about Hitler, EatTheRich, is that - all that you/we know about him is a lie. Yes, the lie of those who write the history books.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
Unlike you, I don’t care what color someone is.
You care a great deal about what someone's color is. Unlike me, you want color to play a role in hiring, school admissions, etc. while I don't.

And no, none of you whiners have yet to answer the question.
I answered you're question directly.
You refuse to accept that obvious fact staring you in the face because the answer doesn't suit your bias and narrative.
Your assertion otherwise is as blatantly false as your saying those who disagree with you here are whining.

Whites are 8% of S. Africa’s population but own 73% of the land.
What @Queen Titania said. Plus, it wouldn't justify racial genocide.

What “hiring manager” told you you were denied a job because you were white? Was the job playing a Black person in a movie?
Like Fins, you refuse to accept my answer because you don't like it. That you wish it weren't true doesn't make it untrue. I was told explicitly by the hiring manager (btw, hiring manager is a thing; it doesn't belong in quotes) that he couldn't hire me because the company wanted more minority employees. Deal with it, either by reconsidering your stance on the issue or by branding me a liar, but not by playing make-believe. (We all already know you're not going to reconsider anything, so don't waste your time calling me a liar.)

Race categories are as arbitrary as astrological signs for attributing distribution of skill, talent, or capability, other than the social capability to benefit from race discrimination.
That you wish it were true doesn't make it true.

“The black-haired Jewish youth lies in wait for hours on end, satanically glaring at and spying on the unsuspicious girl whom he plans to seduce, adulterating her blood and removing her from the bosom of her own people. The Jew uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations of a subjugated people. In his systematic efforts to ruin girls and women he strives to break down the last barriers of discrimination between him and other peoples. The Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate. For as long as a people remain racially pure and are conscious of the treasure of their blood, they can never be overcome by the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew become master of any people except a bastardized people.”-Adolf Hitler

Sure sounds like race hatred to me
What @Queen Titania said.
You may not like that something is so but someone pointing out that it's so isn't hatred.

Also, how is any of what I said untrue? “National Socialism” in Germany ... which was not too unlike fascism anywhere ... led to mass poverty, statism, a reinforced patriarchy, persecution of minorities, and cultural stagnation.
I don't like to be so redundant but: What @Queen Titania said. :)
What you said and what you say here contain untruths and distortions.
- National Socialism in Germany (btw, it's "Nazi" that belongs in quotes, not National Socialism) did reinforce patriarchy. It also celebrated and honored womanhood and improved immensely the lives of it's women. These are positives.
- NS is statist to a large extent. Also fascistic -- by the classical & proper definition of fascism rather than by it's popular usage -- to a large extent. The key difference being that rather than the people serving the state, as in Italian fascism and your brand of statism in practice if not in philosophy, in NS the state's only legitimate role is to serve the people. See here: http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com/2009/
- Jews were targeted. No one denies that. The cause was not racial hatred; there were reasons and rational justification. Ditto the Roma. You may disagree with the policy and/or how it was implemented but may not justly cast it as "persecution of minorities."
- German NS brought unprecedented prosperity and cultural renewal. The proofs are overwhelming. Assertions of mass poverty and cultural stagnation are untrue.
 
Last edited:

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
What an enormous and blatant lie - National Socialism worked and worked incredibly well. It was the perfect solution for Germany's, and possibly Europes, woes, at that time. It bought a renewed feeling of self worth and innocent happiness, to a broken people, with it. It was hailed, the world over, as an economic miracle with everyone of any importance clambering for a place at Hitler's table - but National Socialism could only work in times of peace which is what Hitler was pleading for before and all the way through WWII. https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html

After WWII, as a ps, the UK adopted it - for what was the Welfare State if not National Socialism?

The thing to remember about Hitler, EatTheRich, is that - all that you/we know about him is a lie. Yes, the lie of those who write the history books.
London, before the war:

 

Fins

Fray Terror
You care a great deal about what someone's color is. Unlike me, you want color to play a role in hiring, school admissions, etc. while I don't.


I answered you're question directly.
You refuse to accept that obvious fact staring you in the face because the answer doesn't suit your bias and narrative.
Your assertion otherwise is as blatantly false as your saying those who disagree with you here are whining.


What @Queen Titania said. Plus, it wouldn't justify racial genocide.


Like Fins, you refuse to accept my answer because you don't like it. That you wish it weren't true doesn't make it untrue. I was told explicitly by the hiring manager (btw, hiring manager is a thing; it doesn't belong in quotes) that he couldn't hire me because the company wanted more minority employees. Deal with it, either by reconsidering your stance on the issue or by branding me a liar, but not by playing make-believe. (We all already know you're not going to reconsider anything, so don't waste your time calling me a liar.)


That you wish it were true doesn't make it true.


What @Queen Titania said.
You may not like that something is so but someone pointing out that it's so isn't hatred.


I don't like to be so redundant but: What @Queen Titania said. :)
What you said and what you say here contain untruths and distortions.
- National Socialism in Germany (btw, it's "Nazi" that belongs in quotes, not National Socialism) did reinforce patriarchy. It also celebrated and honored womanhood and improved immensely the lives of it's women. These are positives.
- NS is statist to a large extent. Also fascistic -- by the classical & proper definition of fascism rather than by it's popular usage -- to a large extent. The key difference being that rather than the people serving the state, as in Italian fascism and your brand of statism in practice if not in philosophy, in NS the state's only legitimate role is to serve the people. See here: http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com/2009/
- Jews were targeted. No one denies that. The cause was not racial hatred; there were reasons and rational justification. Ditto the Roma. You may disagree with the policy and/or how it was implemented but may not justly cast it as "persecution of minorities."
- German NS brought unprecedented prosperity and cultural renewal. The proofs are overwhelming. Assertions of mass poverty and cultural stagnation are untrue.
You gave a weak dodge. You never answered the question
 
London, before the war:


I am not sure how many agreed with NS in Britain, it is hard to gauge, but when I asked an elderly woman recently, at a WWI artifacts exhibition, 'what on earth possessed people to join up and go and fight another bloody war when the experience of last one was still so bitterly felt in the collective memory' - 'the army gave them three square meals a day' she said. Though I do not doubt that the relentless propaganda helped - remembering that other collective memory being of a fear of invasion.
That said, when freedom of speech and expression, and thus thought, still existed here - during the 1960s and into the 1970s - after Empire, and all that, we were honestly seeking for the truths of our past. We still had honest and open minded historian like A J P Taylor and philosophers like Berty Russell on the TV as so was Oswald Mosley. The Holoco$t hadn't really been invented yet or rather 'the tall tale had not yet been refined' - Distrust of the Jew was still the norm - My Struggle was as discussed as was Marx and many others - people did openly side with Hitler's thoughts and most certainly, even those who believed WWII was a just war, the war was regretted. Churchill was still despised by most ----------- and so on.
It is difficult though, for people who have been through a war, to change their minds and say 'it was for nothing that they died' or that 'we fought the wrong enemy' --- some did though as so did their children ---- but propaganda to us is not that pure thing that it was in Goebbels mind and has now been taken to such an extreme that the populous has lost possession of its mind.
 
You gave a weak dodge. You never answered the question
Perhaps you would like to rephrase it then - since Emily has done her best to honestly answer the question that she believed that you had asked - an answer which you are not satisfied with sooooo one can only conclude that you obviously hadn't made your question clear.
 

Fins

Fray Terror
Perhaps you would like to rephrase it then - since Emily has done her best to honestly answer the question that she believed that you had asked - an answer which you are not satisfied with sooooo one can only conclude that you obviously hadn't made your question clear.
Or one can conclude she, like 45, doesn’t want to really answer because it would disprove her claim of being discriminated against
 
1. That people who are white have less trouble getting jobs than people who aren’t means you weren’t denied a job because you were white. You were denied the job because other applicants were better.
2. The idea of racial superiority (“innate racial characteristics”) that make people of one race better suited for a given job is nonsense. Race doesn’t even exist in a. biological sense. If hockey is a “white” sport, might that have something to do with the money required to participate in it?
3. I’ve read Mein Kampf and I can assure you that Nazism is based on race hatred, glorification of lawlessness and violence, nationalism, anti-communism, and stupidity.
1) By Emily's description of what happened, she was denied a job because she was white. Now you can excuse it away as much as you like but that is the truth of it --- what ever you think the rights and wrongs of it were, it was discriminatory.

2) For instance - The Great African civilizations are gone - that Africa has been raped, pillaged and plundered we cannot not disagree - but it is on what happens to a peoples whose spiritual, structural and actual cultural roots have been destroyed that we don't seem to agree ETR and therefore we cannot agree on any true understanding and good solutions for the displaced and or the disenfranchised.

3) The opposite is true - one has to wonder which translation you read.
 

EatTheRich

President
Hitler wrote that in 1924. A time when interracial marriage was so joyously celebrated in the USofA, when the Black man and woman were held in such high esteem that American parents wished nothing better for their children than that they should marry a black person - wasn't it EatTheRich?

Of the Jewish betrayal of the German people after they had generously opened their doors to those fleeing oppression we have spoken many times - and now 'The domain of the Weimar Republic is the whole Planet' Prof R Dommergue - and look what is happening in Europe. Complaining about what is happening is not racists EatTheRich - it is, as it was, defencive.

Of South African wealth - if it is 73% of land it is 73% of the worked land not the land as a whole --- Land which has been worked by their families for 300 years. And we know what happened when Rhodesia became Zimbabwe under the same circumstance - The Zulu are standing with the White farmers now in SA btw - and farmers are not the richest people in SA. It is the mines which yield wealth there.
No, as you know, race-hatred was typical of the capitalist system Hitler defended, and his version of it was just one of the most virulent.

Most of the S. African farms were Black-owned until the 20th century when by coordinated legal and extralegal pressure whites took them for themselves. What happened in Zimbabwe was corruption and incompetence.
 
Except whites are still privileged in S. Africa
HAHAHA. Did you really say that?. South Africa has MASSIVE affirmative action special treatment for blacks. Even worse than in america. It's called Black Economic Empowement - BEE - and it's everywhere in south africa.

Sure - blacks in SA are still poor and in misery but that's because they are mentally inferior.
 
Nationalist Socialist= White supremacist bigot
Bitten by WASPs

The Nazis and the Klan are against other White nationalities. The Klan also hates Catholics and union members. They were financed by Republican businessmen to send strikebreakers up North.

The Internet's politics do not reflect reality, only what we are told to think is really going on, bombarded into our warped consciousness by the tiny class that has the power to control our minds. Cradle-to-grave brainwashing is a lot more sophisticated than the examples the media present through their illusion-machines in order to trick us into believing we'd easily figure out if we were being brainwashed. Even the phrase "cradle-to-grave" is strictly applied to government, when not only does the private-sector regime practice that, it also owns the government.
 
Top