If not a citizen...………..deportSo you DON’T think the government should be telling people whether to live in Mexico or in the U.S.?
If not a citizen...………..deportSo you DON’T think the government should be telling people whether to live in Mexico or in the U.S.?
Again, we are supposed to talk about ideas and events and not about posters.That's because you're a Socialist expecting others to pay your way...…...'used book store clerk' rather than a Plumber or Electrician making $40@hr................
86 you're whining shit, YOU are the reason you have nothing...…..and never shall
But somehow I owe the landlord a place to live for free?If not for the Private Property owner, you be running around town as you posted sleeping on friends couches...………..Grow The Fvck Up...………..NO ONE owes you a place to live for free and you will never get a place to live for free unless off friends that will allow you to spunge off their money
Bottom line: you support big government telling people where to live.Nuance does escape you doesn't it?
As you do.If not a citizen...………..deport
NO...…….the landlord should refuse to rent to youBut somehow I owe the landlord a place to live for free?
as I do what?Bottom line: you support big government telling people where to live.
As you do.
You support the government telling people where they can and can’t live and work.as I do what?
False equivalence. I support enforcement of immigration laws by big government. An original purpose of government. Government shouldn't be telling citizens what street to live on. Not really that difficult to follow.Bottom line: you support big government telling people where to live.
As you do.
How many atrocities have to be committed in the name of enforcing U.S. immigration law before you can hear people cry?False equivalence. I support enforcement of immigration laws by big government. An original purpose of government. Government shouldn't be telling citizens what street to live on. Not really that difficult to follow.
Failing argument you appeal to emotion.How many atrocities have to be committed in the name of enforcing U.S. immigration law before you can hear people cry?
It seems the current republic is unable to sustain the rule of law. It has incessantly remade the world in its image since WWII, as Britain did before it, with the results you see.Failing argument you appeal to emotion.
Rule of law matters. These riots and lootings should prove that to anybody. This can no longer be about importing people but instead exporting the American experiment more broadly. So that the world, of free will and effort, becomes more like in America as suits them and their needs. That is what is sustainable in the end.
How many atrocities have to be committed by people violating U.S. immigration law before you can hear people cry?How many atrocities have to be committed in the name of enforcing U.S. immigration law before you can hear people cry?
Beautifully said. The problem being that "exporting the American experiment" seems to always translate to military operations. Righting the American experiment gone awry at home seems like the best first step.This can no longer be about importing people but instead exporting the American experiment more broadly. So that the world, of free will and effort, becomes more like in America as suits them and their needs. That is what is sustainable in the end.
S. Korea, Germany, Japan after being subdued did just fine. We, as you imply, need to achieve the same without the kind of armed conflict it took in the listed prior three.Beautifully said. The problem being that "exporting the American experiment" seems to always translate to military operations.
Too bad for so many "free minded" people that might only be an accomplishment that can be brought about by a reasoned Christian re-awakening. Don't hold your breath.Righting the American experiment gone awry at home seems like the best first step.
Softness brought on by wealth foolishly humored communist ideology in the various institutions of this country. Only excision of the diseased tissue will cure the patient.It seems the current republic is unable to sustain the rule of law. It has incessantly remade the world in its image since WWII, as Britain did before it, with the results you see.
Sorry, but I disagree. Coulda shoulda woulda. None of those wars accomplished a thing. You don't need to wage wars to engage in trade - in fact, wars actually reduce trade.I'm glad the "blunder" killed Saddam and his fvcking evil spawn. We'd still be patrolling no fly zones and choking off food and medical supplies to Iraq today but for invading Iraq. Islam would be incensed beyond belief at killing another million or two children as Maddy Max Albright confessed to with our economic blockade.
Had we left quickly without the politically correct nation building nonsense foisted on us by "liberal" elements we'd be just fine. Iran would have been more cowed thinking how we can just go in and kill every fvcking thing walking on two legs and talking Islamist shit like it was nothing.
Vietnam, Iraq, Korea, ... they all could have been wins but for politicians and political brass.
Easy peazy.
Pax America as promised by the Bretton Woods agreement and untold trillions in trade that raised Europe back up and turd world countries becoming more habitable and also richer themselves. ;0)
Have you heard of Bretton Woods (before just now)?Sorry, but I disagree. Coulda shoulda woulda. None of those wars accomplished a thing. You don't need to wage wars to engage in trade - in fact, wars actually reduce trade.
You mean the thing that has completely destroyed the world economy?Have you heard of Bretton Woods (before just now)?
To hear of it people say the U.S. guaranteed world trade in the modern sense by getting rid of the old way of doing trade (via empire) which was highly war prone. The U.S. guaranteed the safe passage on the high seas of free trade with the most powerful navy left intact after WWII and a economic/monetary system. In return participants allied against the Soviet Union and had the viable and vast U.S. markets to sell into.You mean the thing that has completely destroyed the world economy?
They're All Symptoms of the Same Dollar Disease | RealClearMarkets
What everyone most feared was a relapse. It would have been one more tragedy piled up on top of the biggest tragedy in human history. In designing the Bretton Woods system seventy-five years ago,...www.realclearmarkets.com
This is the quintessential "cure is worse than the disease" situation.
No wars - trade, currency or shooting.To hear of it people say the U.S. guaranteed world trade in the modern sense by getting rid of the old way of doing trade (via empire) which was highly war prone. The U.S. guaranteed the safe passage on the high seas of free trade with the most powerful navy left intact after WWII and a economic/monetary system. In return participants allied against the Soviet Union and had the viable and vast U.S. markets to sell into.
That trade in the end has built up impoverished nations and sustained first world nations in world peace by and large. Tens of trillions if not hundreds of trillions in trade were the by product.
If you're claiming mismanagement or whatever you still have to give credit to where it is due up to some point in time. I certainly would entertain hearing how it coulda, woulda been done better. ;0)
You're one of those whacky libertytarians. All Ron Paul Theory and no practice similar to communism. :0)No wars - trade, currency or shooting.