This ended the Nixon presidency. Will it put Obama in jail?

[Capitalist]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/22/trump-team-communications-captured-by-intelligence-community-surveillance-nunes-says.html

So Trump team WAS tapped! How 'bout that!

To refresh your memory let us stroll down history lane: Nixon was under investigation for breaking and entering and bugging democratic opponents. This was Watergate. Nixon was about to be impeached and removed from office.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal

This is exactly the same thing but with Ds and Rs swapped and technology updated for the 21st century. Who among us will call for the indictment and trial of Barrack Hussein Obama for implementing Watergate 2.0?

@middleview ?
@Arkady ?
@Spamature ?
@Craig ?

Who wants to be the first to uphold principles over political expediency? Who will set aside politics and do the right thing by demanding an Obama indictment with exactly the same fury as that which descended upon Nixon?

Don't let the crickets speak for you. Silence is complicity. To not speak out now is to be an accomplice. The whole world is watching liberals to see what they will do. And the forum is watching you.

 

[middleview]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/22/trump-team-communications-captured-by-intelligence-community-surveillance-nunes-says.html

So Trump team WAS tapped! How 'bout that!

To refresh your memory let us stroll down history lane: Nixon was under investigation for breaking and entering and bugging democratic opponents. This was Watergate. Nixon was about to be impeached and removed from office.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal

This is exactly the same thing but with Ds and Rs swapped and technology updated for the 21st century. Who among us will call for the indictment and trial of Barrack Hussein Obama for implementing Watergate 2.0?

@middleview ?
@Arkady ?
@Spamature ?
@Craig ?

Who wants to be the first to uphold principles over political expediency? Who will set aside politics and do the right thing by demanding an Obama indictment with exactly the same fury as that which descended upon Nixon?

Don't let the crickets speak for you. Silence is complicity. To not speak out now is to be an accomplice. The whole world is watching liberals to see what they will do. And the forum is watching you.

1. No. There is no evidence of any wiretap on Trump campaign staff.
2. The first crime was breaking and entering. The intent was to place listening devices.
There was no B&E at Trump Tower. There is no evidence of a wiretap at Trump Tower.
3. From your link: Members of the intelligence community "incidentally collected" communications from the Trump transition team during legal surveillance operations of foreign targets, a top Republican lawmaker said Wednesday afternoon.

 

[marvin martian]

1. No. There is no evidence of any wiretap on Trump campaign staff.
2. The first crime was breaking and entering. The intent was to place listening devices.
There was no B&E at Trump Tower. There is no evidence of a wiretap at Trump Tower.
3. From your link: Members of the intelligence community "incidentally collected" communications from the Trump transition team during legal surveillance operations of foreign targets, a top Republican lawmaker said Wednesday afternoon.

This story is far from over. More details will emerge. You've already gone from steadfastly denying ANY surveillance took place to now whining that it was just "incidental". The glide path is established...

 

[Craig]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/22/trump-team-communications-captured-by-intelligence-community-surveillance-nunes-says.html

So Trump team WAS tapped! How 'bout that!

To refresh your memory let us stroll down history lane: Nixon was under investigation for breaking and entering and bugging democratic opponents. This was Watergate. Nixon was about to be impeached and removed from office.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal

This is exactly the same thing but with Ds and Rs swapped and technology updated for the 21st century. Who among us will call for the indictment and trial of Barrack Hussein Obama for implementing Watergate 2.0?

@middleview ?
@Arkady ?
@Spamature ?
@Craig ?

Who wants to be the first to uphold principles over political expediency? Who will set aside politics and do the right thing by demanding an Obama indictment with exactly the same fury as that which descended upon Nixon?

Don't let the crickets speak for you. Silence is complicity. To not speak out now is to be an accomplice. The whole world is watching liberals to see what they will do. And the forum is watching you.

No...the Trump team was not tapped...

From your link...

...lawfully gathered intelligence on foreign officials included information on U.S. Persons, potentially including those associated with President Trump or the President himself...

The tRump team seems to have spoken with many Russians...and they were tapped.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/22/trump-team-communications-captured-by-intelligence-community-surveillance-nunes-says.html

So Trump team WAS tapped! How 'bout that!

To refresh your memory let us stroll down history lane: Nixon was under investigation for breaking and entering and bugging democratic opponents. This was Watergate. Nixon was about to be impeached and removed from office.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal

This is exactly the same thing but with Ds and Rs swapped and technology updated for the 21st century. Who among us will call for the indictment and trial of Barrack Hussein Obama for implementing Watergate 2.0?

@middleview ?
@Arkady ?
@Spamature ?
@Craig ?

Who wants to be the first to uphold principles over political expediency? Who will set aside politics and do the right thing by demanding an Obama indictment with exactly the same fury as that which descended upon Nixon?

Don't let the crickets speak for you. Silence is complicity. To not speak out now is to be an accomplice. The whole world is watching liberals to see what they will do. And the forum is watching you.

I have a feeling this is more of a political wiretap Nunes said it had nothing to do with the Russian investigation.

 

[middleview]

This story is far from over. More details will emerge. You've already gone from steadfastly denying ANY surveillance took place to now whining that it was just "incidental". The glide path is established...

Incidental is the term the FBI used to characterize what they call it when they tap the Russian ambassador's phone and Flynn calls him.

There was no wiretap on the phones at Trump Tower.....

 

[Capitalist]

1. No. There is no evidence of any wiretap on Trump campaign staff.
2. The first crime was breaking and entering. The intent was to place listening devices.
There was no B&E at Trump Tower. There is no evidence of a wiretap at Trump Tower.
3. From your link: Members of the intelligence community "incidentally collected" communications from the Trump transition team during legal surveillance operations of foreign targets, a top Republican lawmaker said Wednesday afternoon.

So what part of "technology updated for 21st century" don't you understand?

Breaking and entry is a violation of the 4th Amendment.

"Incidental collection" and "widely disseminated" is a violation of the 4th Amendment. See, that's the 2.0. Don't play dumb.

Unless. . .

 

[Capitalist]

Incidental is the term the FBI used to characterize what they call it when they tap the Russian ambassador's phone and Flynn calls him.

There was no wiretap on the phones at Trump Tower.....

Which only underscores the similarity with Watergate.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Incidental is the term the FBI used to characterize what they call it when they tap the Russian ambassador's phone and Flynn calls him.

There was no wiretap on the phones at Trump Tower.....

This wiretap had nothing to do with a russian investigation

But come Friday we'll know better.

 

[marvin martian]

There was no wiretap on the phones at Trump Tower.....

You don't know that, it's just the outcome you would like to see. More investigation is needed.

 

[Dawg]

Libs are looking like long tail cats in a room full of rocking chairs:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-feels-somewhat-vindicated-after-nunes-intel-briefing/ar-BByBfw8?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

 

[Capitalist]

Incidental is the term the FBI used to characterize what they call it when they tap the Russian ambassador's phone and Flynn calls him.

There was no wiretap on the phones at Trump Tower.....

This is 2017--the age of wireless. PRISM, Snowden, and XKeyscore. No physical wiretap is necessary to violate the 4th Amendment.

 

[Capitalist]

I have a feeling this is more of a political wiretap Nunes said it had nothing to do with the Russian investigation.

Which only underscores the similarity with Watergate.

 

[Capitalist]

This story is far from over. More details will emerge. You've already gone from steadfastly denying ANY surveillance took place to now whining that it was just "incidental". The glide path is established...

All that remains is "time until impact."

 

[middleview]

So what part of "technology updated for 21st century" don't you understand?

Breaking and entry is a violation of the 4th Amendment.

"Incidental collection" and "widely disseminated" is a violation of the 4th Amendment. See, that's the 2.0. Don't play dumb.

Unless. . .

What part of How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!
Do you not understand?

Feel free to ask for an investigation into who may have told the press about Flynn talking to the Russian ambassador even though he told Pence he had not....

 

[Capitalist]

I have a feeling this is more of a political wiretap Nunes said it had nothing to do with the Russian investigation.

I caught that. This is a huge deal! This was NOT about the Russian investigation.

Then it was about. . .what?

Politics.

Watergate.

 

[Capitalist]

What part of How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!
Do you not understand?

Feel free to ask for an investigation into who may have told the press about Flynn talking to the Russian ambassador even though he told Pence he had not....

This has nothing to do with the Russian investigation. Did you miss that?

 

[Capitalist]

What part of How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!
Do you not understand?

Once again, it looks like Trump is exactly right!

 

[Spamature]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/22/trump-team-communications-captured-by-intelligence-community-surveillance-nunes-says.html

So Trump team WAS tapped! How 'bout that!

To refresh your memory let us stroll down history lane: Nixon was under investigation for breaking and entering and bugging democratic opponents. This was Watergate. Nixon was about to be impeached and removed from office.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal

This is exactly the same thing but with Ds and Rs swapped and technology updated for the 21st century. Who among us will call for the indictment and trial of Barrack Hussein Obama for implementing Watergate 2.0?

@middleview ?
@Arkady ?
@Spamature ?
@Craig ?

Who wants to be the first to uphold principles over political expediency? Who will set aside politics and do the right thing by demanding an Obama indictment with exactly the same fury as that which descended upon Nixon?

Don't let the crickets speak for you. Silence is complicity. To not speak out now is to be an accomplice. The whole world is watching liberals to see what they will do. And the forum is watching you.

What ?

What part of (from your link)

legal surveillance operations of foreign targets,

do you not understand ?

Watergate was about breaking into the DNC and stealing their files. Which is what exactly Trump's boss Putin did using his military intelligence unit.

 

[Dawg]

This is 2017--the age of wireless. PRISM, Snowden, and XKeyscore. No physical wiretap is necessary to violate the 4th Amendment.

One would think someone that claims to be an IT would know all that.......hummmmm