New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

This is the multi-culturalism socialists stand for

Arkady

President
1) The stories of ambulances and fire trucks stoned or police buildings closed because they feel unsafe says otherwise when it comes to no go zones all over Europe.
If you'd like to link to a story in a reputable outlet about such a thing, I'd be happy to discuss.

2) When the second guy shows up to investigate he too is attacked.
It's unclear from that video what he did to provoke the confrontation. Certainly he went there hoping for trouble. He had a story he was hoping to tell, and we only saw the bits of video he chose to show us. Given the fact Tommy Robinson is a serial criminal, who has been arrested repeatedly for his law breaking (including illegal immigration to the US, ironically), a person would have to be foolish to assume his videos are an honest recounting of events.
 

Arkady

President
How about the other assaults described by the "propagandist?" Also, untrue?
Not that I know of. Europe is a very big place, so even with unusually low rates of violent crime (by US standards), a dedicated cherry-picker will be able to turn up genuine stories of terrible crimes like that.
 
Not that I know of. Europe is a very big place, so even with unusually low rates of violent crime (by US standards), a dedicated cherry-picker will be able to turn up genuine stories of terrible crimes like that.
We all know that UK, German, and Swedish law enforcement [Unwelcome language removed] the crime numbers for socialist political reasons. Coincidence you'll say that isn't true? I don't think so.
 

Arkady

President
We all know that UK, German, and Swedish law enforcement [Unwelcome language removed] the crime numbers for socialist political reasons.
We don't know that. That's just something you've asserted because you don't like what the numbers say. We could as easily assert, in the other direction, that the US fudges its crime numbers for capitalist political reasons, and that therefore the stats of the UK, Germany, and Sweden are even more impressive, in relative terms.
 
We don't know that. That's just something you've asserted because you don't like what the numbers say. We could as easily assert, in the other direction, that the US fudges its crime numbers for capitalist political reasons, and that therefore the stats of the UK, Germany, and Sweden are even more impressive, in relative terms.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10558567/Scotland-Yard-chief-admits-claims-of-crime-figure-manipulation-contain-some-truth.html


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/20/london-now-dangerous-new-york-crime-stats-suggest/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4260908/Swedish-policeman-blames-migrants-violent-crime.html
 

Arkady

President
I wouldn't be surprised if, consistent with your Telegraph piece, there were isolated examples of "dishonesty"' in every country. But is there any sign that it's worse in some than in others -- much less enough of a difference to explain the MASSIVE differences in the numbers. For example, maybe there are a few more of those isolated examples of dishonesty in Germany than in the US. Or maybe there are a few more in the US than in Germany. But when the US murder rate is nearly six times as high as the German murder rate, it seems unlikely such reporting glitches are making a difference in the big picture. That's especially true when it comes to homicide, where the fact of a dead body makes it a lot tougher to play reporting games the way you might with a vaguer line like whether something was an "assault" or an "aggravated assault."
 
That's especially true when it comes to homicide, where the fact of a dead body makes it a lot tougher to play reporting games the way you might with a vaguer line like whether something was an "assault" or an "aggravated assault."
This is my line. ha ha

I use it all the time when exposing black criminality in America.

Nice theft.
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
To be clear, that video is not an indication of a "no go zone." It's an incident where a reporter who is filming a bunch of homeless people gets confronted about the filming (presumably because they don't want to be identified by authorities). That's not to excuse any violence, but obviously it's a far-cry from a no-go zone.
So an area where you aren't allowed to go into because of the threat of violence (consequences) is NOT a "no go zone"...

Dare I ask then, what IS a no-go zone?

I mean, by definition, a no-go zone is a place where people aren't allowed to go. Clearly, this guy isn't allowed to go there..
 

Arkady

President
So an area where you aren't allowed to go into because of the threat of violence (consequences) is NOT a "no go zone"...
If a "no go zone" were any place you can't go without an absolute guarantee there won't be violence, the whole planet would be a no-go zone.
 
Unfortunately that is happening far to much here in the US as well. Multiculturalism doesn't work, and never did. Immigrants need to respect our ways or they can't be allowed to stay.
Britain has, for most of our history, had open door immigration but the main mass immigrants of the past were of religious refugees from Europe who did integrate and were hard working. This is a folly of and a left over of Empire which is a mass immigration of people who are not willing to integrate, who live in purposeful segregation, and are now openly hostile to the indigenous population. One could say 'serves 'em right' but they threw us out of their lands - a stubborn political narrative of denial disallows us to do the same.
 
Top