Those same freedoms apply to all thanks to those efforts. A wealthy persons success and another's lack thereof are not mutually exclusive.Your first mistake is to believe that they have more through their own efforts. Some are wealthy because they took a risk, another roll of the dice, a gamble on the market...some are wealthy because they inherited it (think Trump)....
I am unaware of anyone proposing a transfer of wealth from the wealthy to you or I. We are talking about funding our government and one could argue that those who are extremely wealthy got there because the opportunities available precisely because of the freedoms secured by those who fought for them...or those who helped build the infrastructures needed to make money, or those employees they hired who actually did the work.
I think we discovered Romney was actually paying about 14% of his income in federal taxes. Meanwhile he made a ton of money when he destroyed Toys R Us, dumping thousands of people from their jobs. I worked for a startup company that made the first 20 or so employees millionaires... but it was those same people who bailed out, sold the company to a competitor who then parted the company out and put 11,000 people out of work.
I don't feel too bad for them and their tax problem.
The government has to pay the bills. The thing I regret is that politicians cannot get it together that they must live within a budget. If they continually increase spending eventually they will kill investment and the opportunity for any possibility that US business can compete in a global economy. It makes perfect sense to me that we wouldn't tax those living from paycheck to paycheck into poverty. Progressive tax rates are fair...what isn't fair is the loopholes letting the rich get away with paying far less than they should.