Then hold them to the same standard. For example Ivanka was trying to get some very lucrative trademarks in China. They weren't going for it. Trump wins. China changes it's mind.Where did I say they should not be held to the same standards? But at least they had their businesses in place before their father became President (unlike, say, a severely drug addicted Hunter Biden).
Seriously?
I'm all for it. One thing you will find about me is that I am no hypocrite. Now, about those Biden/Clinton appearances of impropriety...Then hold them to the same standard. For example Ivanka was trying to get some very lucrative trademarks in China. They weren't going for it. Trump wins. China changes it's mind.
Look into it
Look at how your fellow Trump supporters act though. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.I'm all for it. One thing you will find about me is that I am no hypocrite. Now, about those Biden/Clinton appearances of impropriety...
The appearance of impropriety that is subject of this thread is the impropriety of Trump trying to get a foreign government to help him get dirt on his primary political opponent. And using aid to twist their arm.I'm all for it. One thing you will find about me is that I am no hypocrite. Now, about those Biden/Clinton appearances of impropriety...
I'm not a Trump supporter. My only interest is in keeping both sides from propagandizing the issues that face us.Look at how your fellow Trump supporters act though. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Case in point nutty Cortez's ridiculous post above.
Yes, it's a serious issue that should be looked into. But I'm hearing that there was clearly no quid pro quo, such as there was when Biden did it. How about we discuss being consistent...The appearance of impropriety that is subject of this thread is the impropriety of Trump trying to get a foreign government to help him get dirt on his primary political opponent. And using aid to twist their arm.
How about we discuss the actual subject of the thread?
You always defend Trump and never seem to go after the hypocrisy like that of Nutty Cortez above.I'm not a Trump supporter. My only interest is in keeping both sides from propagandizing the issues that face us.
There clearly was a quid pro quo.Yes, it's a serious issue that should be looked into. But I'm hearing that there was clearly no quid pro quo, such as there was when Biden did it. How about we discuss being consistent...
Not in the least. In fact I don't understand why the right wing does not complain to their representatives in Congress. The had Control of BOTH Houses and did nothing. Why is that. They still have control of the Senate and... nothing.Does that mean they are immune from being charged with corruption? That, of course, is absurd.
you mean like Biden getting a foreign prosecutor fired by threatening to withhold loan guarantees? THAT kind of quid pro quo??There clearly was a quid pro quo.
There was an allegation of a quid pro quo. Now it seems the "whistleblower" may not have actually heard the conversation or read the transcripts, but was relying on second hand accounts.There clearly was a quid pro quo.
I seriously could not care less what your perception of my record here is.You always defend Trump and never seem to go after the hypocrisy like that of Nutty Cortez above.
If you want me to believe that you aren't a Trump supporter and just want both sides to be fair don't tell me......show me. Prove it.
Because I have seen no evidence of it.
Why are you more worried about what the former VP may or may not have done and not at all worried about what the current president is doing.you mean like Biden getting a foreign prosecutor fired by threatening to withhold loan guarantees? THAT kind of quid pro quo??
Nice Dodge.I seriously could not care less what your perception of my record here is.
Process needs to be followed. The law requires the complaint be turned over to the intelligence committee. Instead they are trying to cover it up.There was an allegation of a quid pro quo. Now it seems the "whistleblower" may not have actually heard the conversation or read the transcripts, but was relying on second hand accounts.
Why do you not care what a VP did, and boasts about? Could it be partisan hackery?Why are you more worried about what the former VP may or may not have done and not at all worried about what the current president is doing.
Could it be partisan hackery?
The subject of this thread is Trump's corruption. Biden and his son are tangential.
Try to stick to the subject.
Start a thread about that.Why do you not care what a VP did, and boasts about? Could it be partisan hackery?
You have PROOF of what Biden did...his own statements on video. You have hearsay about what Trump allegedly did, which is denied by BOTH parties to the call.
Just technicalities for the faker. He got busted promoting left wing conspiracies he gleaned off alt-left propaganda sites and rather than just try to save face at this point and admit he got duped he's just edited to double down.Why do you not care what a VP did, and boasts about? Could it be partisan hackery?
You have PROOF of what Biden did...his own statements on video. You have hearsay about what Trump allegedly did, which is denied by BOTH parties to the call.