New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Trump Successfully Baits Democrats

middleview

President
Supporting Member
but it would have been legal for Trump to PAY for dirt on Hillary, right? After all, middleview just said so.
Not just dirt...ANYTHING of value must be declared as a contribution unless it is paid for.
If Trump had paid Russia for an illegal hack on the DNC email server then he would certainly be impeached.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Not just dirt...ANYTHING of value must be declared as a contribution unless it is paid for.
If Trump had paid Russia for an illegal hack on the DNC email server then he would certainly be impeached.
You need send your message to 116th Congress, especially Omar, Talib & AOC
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Not just dirt...ANYTHING of value must be declared as a contribution unless it is paid for.
You cannot ascertain the "value" of dirt or propaganda. Did you even read what Mueller said about it? He said "something of value" means it must be measurable monetarily. There is no way to measure propaganda. Don't be a low IQ left wing toadie. Think for once. Clown.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Brian Fallon would have been paid by the campaign to do that...right? So yes...it is different and shit.
So if Kushner had offered 5 bucks for the Trump Tower meeting things would have been peachy in your low IQ mind?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You cannot ascertain the "value" of dirt or propaganda. Did you even read what Mueller said about it? He said "something of value" means it must be measurable monetarily. There is no way to measure propaganda. Don't be a low IQ left wing toadie. Think for once. Clown.
How much did the Russians spend on their troll farm putting out pro-Trump propaganda?
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Who has said the Trump Tower meeting was illegal?
And the point is the only collusion taking place was between the Clinton campaign and Russia. Only one campaign received dirt on their opponent. Only one paid for dirt. Only one had their dirt used as an excuse to spy on their opponent.

Dirt has no measurable monetary value. It cannot be a campaign finance violation. Paying foreigners for dirt and then having that used against your opponent is collusion, however. At least in the sense mentally ill left wingers define it.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
How much did the Russians spend on their troll farm putting out pro-Trump propaganda?
No clue. But, they weren't working WITH the Trump campaign to do whatever it is they were trying to do.

Keep posting, keep failing. You are living a lie.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
No clue. But, they weren't working WITH the Trump campaign to do whatever it is they were trying to do.

Keep posting, keep failing. You are living a lie.
The number of meetings between Trump campaign people and Russian government contacts certainly makes me wonder. Their efforts served to benefit whom?
 

Marcus Aurelius

Governor
Supporting Member
The number of meetings between Trump campaign people and Russian government contacts certainly makes me wonder. Their efforts served to benefit whom?
You may not have heard, but there was this big two year investigation into just that. Mueller is the name of the guy that ran it. He found no evidence that Trump or anyone in his campaign conspired or colluded with Russia. true story.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
And the point is the only collusion taking place was between the Clinton campaign and Russia. Only one campaign received dirt on their opponent. Only one paid for dirt. Only one had their dirt used as an excuse to spy on their opponent.

Dirt has no measurable monetary value. It cannot be a campaign finance violation. Paying foreigners for dirt and then having that used against your opponent is collusion, however. At least in the sense mentally ill left wingers define it.

1. There was no contact between the Clinton campaign and the Russian government.
2. In fact the Clinton campaign did not receive dirt from Steele....if you would check your facts, Steele delivered the report to McCain. There was no cooperation (collusion) between the Russian government and the Clinton campaign.
3. Carter Page was Hillary's opponent? No kiddin?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You may not have heard, but there was this big two year investigation into just that. Mueller is the name of the guy that ran it. He found no evidence that Trump or anyone in his campaign conspired or colluded with Russia. true story.
"No evidence" is false. Not enough evidence to prosecute is closer to the truth.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You cannot ascertain the "value" of dirt or propaganda. Did you even read what Mueller said about it? He said "something of value" means it must be measurable monetarily. There is no way to measure propaganda. Don't be a low IQ left wing toadie. Think for once. Clown.
On page 188 he is talking specifically about the Trump Tower meeting...not the emails stolen from the DNC email server and delivered to Wikileaks on Trump's behalf.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
The number of meetings between Trump campaign people and Russian government contacts certainly makes me wonder.
No different than all the meetings and deals the Clinton's had with the Russians through the years. And you "wonder" although Mueller said these meetings were benign and nothing of substance occurred. The low IQ you are stricken with is hard to overcome.
 
Top