Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
TDS is real and so is mass hysteria. This is what we are watching
Trump will be acquitted, because it is a poor case
- Thread starter PhilFish
- Start date
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
The Constitution disagrees with you. But you can't read- so there's that
ObamacareForever
Senator
expose Biden for what?
If their was a legitimate corruption case to made it would have been handled through the process laid out by the MLA.
He abused abuse by circumventing the MLA.
it'll get worse..
Bugsy McGurk
President
Yes, of course. Outright witness tampering.
He did with Don McGahn and the Court ruled against Trump.
Nov. 25, 2019, 5:59 PM EST / Updated Nov. 26, 2019, 5:33 AM EST
By Pete Williams
WASHINGTON — A federal judge ruled late Monday that former White House counsel Don McGahn must obey a subpoena for his testimony issued by the House Judiciary Committee.
Federal District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson said McGahn must appear before Congress but retains the ability to "invoke executive privilege where appropriate" during his appearance.
"It is clear to this Court for the reasons explained above that, with respect to senior-level presidential aides, absolute immunity from compelled congressional process simply does not exist," Jackson said in her ruling.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Fixed it
Trump acted correctly by soliciting a politically motivated investigation of biden, so yes it would be in both the US and the Ukranian's interest to remove Biden from hope of office
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
The Articles of Impeachment violate the Constitution. They are defective in their entirety.
They are the product of invalid proceedings that flagrantly denied the President any due process rights.
They rest on dangerous distortions of the Constitution that would do lasting damage to our structure of government, violated our constitutional order, illegally abused its power of impeachment, and attempted to obstruct President Trump’s ability to faithfully execute the duties of his Office.
They sought to undermine his authority under Article II of the Constitution, which vests the entirety of [t]he executive Power in “a President of the United States of America.”
In order to preserve our constitutional structure of government, to reject the poisonous partisanship that the Framers warned against, to ensure one party political impeachment vendettas do not become the new normal, and to vindicate the will of the American people, the Senate must reject both Articles of Impeachment.
In the end, this entire process is nothing more than a dangerous attack on the American people themselves and their fundamental right to vote.
After Schiff's Screed- this was proven 100% Correct
They are the product of invalid proceedings that flagrantly denied the President any due process rights.
They rest on dangerous distortions of the Constitution that would do lasting damage to our structure of government, violated our constitutional order, illegally abused its power of impeachment, and attempted to obstruct President Trump’s ability to faithfully execute the duties of his Office.
They sought to undermine his authority under Article II of the Constitution, which vests the entirety of [t]he executive Power in “a President of the United States of America.”
In order to preserve our constitutional structure of government, to reject the poisonous partisanship that the Framers warned against, to ensure one party political impeachment vendettas do not become the new normal, and to vindicate the will of the American people, the Senate must reject both Articles of Impeachment.
In the end, this entire process is nothing more than a dangerous attack on the American people themselves and their fundamental right to vote.
After Schiff's Screed- this was proven 100% Correct
ObamacareForever
Senator
You just admitted Trump abused his power.
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
You defeated your own argument LOLOL
Federal District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson said McGahn must appear before Congress but retains the ability to "invoke executive privilege where appropriate" during his appearance.
Biden's premise was the ouster of a corrupt prosecutor. yes?
in a nation, that all agree, is saturated with corruption. yes?
for a billion dollars, or else. yes?
but no one else, other than the dude with a path to the company his son worked for. yes?
whose owner was already on the radar for corruption (remember th GB hold of millions?) yes?
get real. we'll see.
why no other person...in the nation rife with corruption??
Schiff made the case....yes or no...that Ukraine was desperate, is desperate for cash...
400 million was a HUUUUUGE impact.. lives at stake..yadda yadda..
but a billion?.??? by Schiffs measure...that would be catastrophic.....
but,,, meh...lets ask for the lowly shokin.
get real.
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Yawning
the witness never presented. nothing was tampered with.. see?
(pssst.....look up witness tampering)
Bugsy McGurk
President
It’s so curious. Trump did not even invoke executive privilege when he ordered his people to defy the impeachment subpoenas, but his supporters seem to think he did, and they use that rationale when trying to defend his lawless obstruction.
Bugsy McGurk
President
Ordering witnesses not to testify at all is the ultimate in witness tampering.
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
You mean go by the law?
How terrible
Try China They might be a better fit for you.
good luck
