sear
Mayor
You mean like that fairy tale about Russia annexing Crimea?"It's why I worry so much about all the propaganda targeting Russia and Putin now." E #20
You mean like that fairy tale about Russia annexing Crimea?"It's why I worry so much about all the propaganda targeting Russia and Putin now." E #20
On the say so of the people of The Crimea who did not want to be a part of The Ukraine.You mean like that fairy tale about Russia annexing Crimea?
You mean like that fairy tale about Russia annexing Crimea?
What she said.On the say so of the people of The Crimea who did not want to be a part of The Ukraine.
I wasn't aware they'd taken a vote on it."On the say so of the people of The Crimea who did not want to be a part of The Ukraine." QT #22
That first one - yeah, maybe. And why not?And Putin's message is unmistakably clear.
- Under Vlad Putin's leadership, Russia will continue to be a bad@$$.
- We'll continue our military disruption in Ukraine.
- We'll continue our support for tyrants, including Syria's Assad.
- We'll continue waging cyber-warfare against the civilized world,
all because we'd rather antagonize than cooperate.
"Ukraine - Propaganda lies" are not an internationally recognized casus belli."Ukraine - Propaganda lies don't undermine the contention that we're being subjected to propaganda lies." E
"Lies" indeed."Assad is a leader beloved by his people. Again, propaganda lies." E #25
The same could be said of Jim Jones, Adolf Hitler, Joey Stalin, or Chairman Mao."Assad is a leader beloved by his people." E #25
Ah!"The USA engages in cyber-warfare, too. To not would be like unilateral disarmament." E #25
They're at present being used, I believe & fear, in the US by the US to prepare the public for "belli." That is my point.Propaganda lies" are not an internationally recognized casus belli.
Lies, indeed."Lies" indeed.
It's the good People of Syria that began the revolt against Assad in the first place.
Assad wiped them out with barrel bombs, chemical weapons, & starvation.
Assad is a leader beloved by his people.
Only of the first two among those.The same could be said of Jim Jones, Adolf Hitler, Joey Stalin, or Chairman Mao.
Of course not. However, self-defense is legitimate.two wrongs do not make a right.
You weren't aware that they hadn't what? Huh? !!!!! Yes they voted to go back to Russia - most had never wanted to be a part of The Ukraine anway. Historically they have always been aligned with Russia. Russia's Navy is stationed there ffs!I wasn't aware they'd taken a vote on it.
In any case, out of the frying pan, & into the fire?
Yours is a lame excuse, not a legitimate justification.
There are legitimate legal / political processes for changing sovereign allegiance.
To deny that is to deny the sovereign legitimacy of the United States of America.
If Putin's intention was merely to acquire sovereign control over Crimea, Putin could have announced his intentions, held a Crimean referendum for it, and completed the transfer without U.N. objection.
But Putin wanted more than mere military territorial conquest.
Putin wanted to send a vivid message to the West.
And Putin's message is unmistakably clear.
- Under Vlad Putin's leadership, Russia will continue to be a bad@$$.
- We'll continue our military disruption in Ukraine.
- We'll continue our support for tyrants, including Syria's Assad.
- We'll continue waging cyber-warfare against the civilized world,
all because we'd rather antagonize than cooperate.
Then why was Putin's military intervention necessary?"You weren't aware that they hadn't what? Huh? !!!!! Yes they voted to go back to Russia - most had never wanted to be a part of The Ukraine anway. Historically they have always been aligned with Russia. Russia's Navy is stationed there ffs!" QT #28
Why then would President Trump, without keeping up with detailed PDB, and without even so much as a meeting with his military commanders engaged in the fight, simply declare the U.S. military withdrawal?? ? ? ?
There seems to be a pall of cognitive fog on this, even from the redoubtable Senator Paul.
Let us be clear that candidate Trump seemed to think ridding the world of radical Islamic terrorism was a worthwhile goal. Why else would President Trump have announced:
"Radical Islamic terrorism. It will be eradicated, believe me." President Trump, mid-September, 2017 following a terrorist attack on a tube train in Parson's Green station in the U.K.
And is there any doubt that ISIL very much belongs in that category.
Why then would President Trump, without keeping up with detailed PDB, and without even so much as a meeting with his military commanders engaged in the fight, simply declare the U.S. military withdrawal?
Is Trump so stupid he doesn't understand the difference between retaking territory temporarily occupied by ISIL, and terminating the last 30,000 members of ISIL?
In any case Kudos to Trump's subordinate commanders for overruling Trump on his extremely ill-chosen decision.
And my personal thanks to the international coalition that has so bravely helped to recycle the protoplasm of this human detritus from the biome.
You just hate Jews, Adolf.It’s not about Jews, it’s not about Israel. It’s about money.
But those telling lies about Putin ARE trying to start WW3, I'm afraid.And know it or not, believe it or not, like it or not, admit it or not; those of us that tell the truth about Putin are NOT trying to start WW3.
So they said, with a deliberately dishonest choice on the plebiscite held following a military occupation and the mass arrest of opposition leaders.On the say so of the people of The Crimea who did not want to be a part of The Ukraine.
Assad’s popular support in Syria was a little above 50% last time I checked.That first one - yeah, maybe. And why not?
Ukraine - Propaganda lies don't undermine the contention that we're being subjected to propaganda lies.
Assad is a leader beloved by his people. Again, propaganda lies.
The USA engages in cyber-warfare, too. To not would be like unilateral disarmament.
Please see posts #25 & #33.Assad’s popular support in Syria was a little above 50% last time I checked.
- dandy -"But those telling lies about Putin ARE trying to start WW3, I'm afraid." E
What military occupation? The Russian Navy is stationed there!So they said, with a deliberately dishonest choice on the plebiscite held following a military occupation and the mass arrest of opposition leaders.
I has always been above 80% - my god you insult all of those brave people who risked life and limb to vote for him by travelling across truly dangerous areas to do so. Assad is loved even by those politically opposed to the government - he stood fast with his people against the might of the West and their evil mercenaries whom you support.Assad’s popular support in Syria was a little above 50% last time I checked.
https://tribunecontentagency.com/article/crimeas-forgotten-victims/What military occupation? The Russian Navy is stationed there!
There was no mass arrest of anyone --- you make it up as you go along.