Doesn't change the fact that it's a man-made pile of horseshit with not an ounce of truth in it.
UN Kooks: Address Gender and Income Inequality or 1,000,000 Species Will Go Extinct!
EatTheRich
President
It wouldn’t change that if what you claim were a fact. But if it were a fact:
1. The weather patterns almost certainly wouldn’t have radically changed in exactly the ways the scientists forecast;
2. We would need to radically revise physics and chemistry to explain why heat, gases, black-body radiation, molecules, and many more things don’t work they way they seem to.
3. We would have to have an alternative explanation for the tremendous heating of the Earth in the last several decades, and one consistent with the known facts.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Weather patterns are not climate.
Yea, you are right, physics needs to be rewritten to make the climate models work.
Dude that is saying that if the equation has the wrong answer, just change the variables until the answer is correct.
Life doesn't work that way, unless you are a schizzo
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
Buulshit. This warning trend is like several before it over the past million years alone.
https://www.google.com/search?q=nasa.gov+global+temperature+chart+million+years&client=ms-android-verizon&prmd=inv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjV67LkoKriAhUMPK0KHU3vBCgQ_AUoAXoECA0QAQ&biw=412&bih=652#imgrc=nnQWEfwJgYv05M
Why do you tell such easily debunked lies?
Last edited by a moderator:
EatTheRich
President
No. Physics needs to be rewritten to be consistent with AGW not occurring.
And of course climate is weather patterns.
EatTheRich
President
Not true. The current warming, which is taking place over too short a time to even show up on the graph, is at a pace more than twice as steep as any of the prior warming trends charted
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
First off, you're full of crap. Secondly, Earth's timeline doesn't work on yours.
Third, prove your assertion.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
All he can do is parrot fat Al Gore who is currently in hiding for his life
EatTheRich
President
AGW makes sense given our current understanding of physics. Rejecting AGW theory would require radically revising our understanding of physics.
EatTheRich
President
Nonsense.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Very informative post
EatTheRich
President
I mean, come on. Al Gore is not in hiding for his life (although I’m sure he takes security precautions to protect himself from right-wing terrorists).
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
Which specific graph and/or text do you think proves your point?
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
He has no point and in his mind he does not need one because everybody agrees
EatTheRich
President
I think once you grasp how a line graph works, my point will be proven.
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
No, you're lying. Or can you show me where your graph specifically compares warming periods of the last million years as you claimed?
Have it. You just post nonsense and hope no one will notice you're full of crap. You lose. Again.
Last edited by a moderator:
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
The words 'current', 'models' and 'theory'. Basically prove this Chicken Little Scam.
They already know they have my old, easily scared base all worried.
Every so often they can say 'Hey look ice is melting !!!!
"Or "Hey look it's warmer than it was last year by 1 degree !!!!"
There is no "Law of Manmade Climate Change" is there ?
By the way, look at the record warmest temps in many of the states. For days on end. many were 100 years ago. Dust bowl anyone ?
EatTheRich
President
Again. My point is very simple. In a graph that covers millions of years, a trend lasting less than a century does not cover enough space on the time axis to really be visible.
