Constitutional Sheepdog
][][][%er!!!!!!!
I can see the denial of PJ's leftist if they have the nerve to watch this.
No they don't. Every citizens voice matters just the same. You'd take these people's word over Steve Baldwin's?I can see the denial of PJ's leftist if they have the nerve to watch this.
Bull sh!t dude.No they don't. Every citizens voice matters just the same. You'd take these people's word over Steve Baldwin's?
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2017/05/07/army-vet-accused-of-shooting-her-service-dog-found-dead/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/01/military-sexual-assault-reports-soar-pentagon-report
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2003/06/19/us/after-the-war-court-case-soldier-in-grenade-attack-is-profiled.html
you didn't watch the video.
Well bucko why did you post two irrelevant post?Ohh I did there bucko. I stand by my previous examples and statements.
More importantly the military has one mission and one ability. That's to kick people's butts when we need them to. Unfortunately the military needs to justify it's existence, and get more funding so it advocates war over peace. After all we must use it if we have it correct?
That is a piss pour foreign policy. Not only does it create more enemies for the US, it also expends unnecessarily great amounts of US citizens blood and treasure. It's damn foolish.
Again. They're all perfectly relevant. It discredits your source, or at the very least offers a possibility that your source, veterans, may not have some supreme intellect over other citizens based on the fact that their veterans. There's no pedestal for vets, or atleast there shouldn't be.Well bucko why did you post two irrelevant post?
What does this have to do with Veterans view on how Trumps foreign policy is doing?Again. They're all perfectly relevant. It discredits your source, or at the very least offers a possibility that your source, veterans, may not have some supreme intellect over other citizens based on the fact that their veterans. There's no pedestal for vets, or atleast there shouldn't be.
Read the OP's title. "Veterans view points matter more than a Hollywood elite."What does this have to do with Veterans view on how Trumps foreign policy is doing?
I wrote it and sexual content isn't the topic. nor is Will HAYDENRead the OP's title. "Veterans view points matter more than a Hollywood elite."
No Dodge. I was showing that veterans and military members are cut from the same cloth as everyone else. Which means neither view point is better than the other. All of my posts prove exactly why veterans are no different.I wrote it and sexual content isn't the topic. nor is Will HAYDEN
YOUR DODGE OF THE TOPIC IS NOTED.
Yes, it was a dodge veteran's viewpoints on presidents foreign policy are worth more than someone who has never servedNo Dodge. I was showing that veterans and military members are cut from the same cloth as everyone else. Which means neither view point is better than the other. All of my posts prove exactly why veterans are no different.
What does sexual content have anything to do with veterans viewpoints on presidents foreign policyAgain. They're all perfectly relevant. It discredits your source, or at the very least offers a possibility that your source, veterans, may not have some supreme intellect over other citizens based on the fact that their veterans. There's no pedestal for vets, or atleast there shouldn't be.
I disagree, as I've stated above, and if you wanna play that game I'll go a step further. Only combat veterans view points on foreign policy are worth more, and I'm not talking about some pog on a fob or someone stationed in Kuwait, I'm talking about actual combat veterans.Yes, it was a dodge veteran's viewpoints on presidents foreign policy are worth more than someone who has never served
What does sexual content have anything to do with veterans viewpoints on presidents foreign policy
It would depend on the individual.af #23
Not determinative, but indicative?
- oops -
veteran's viewpoints on presidents foreign policy are worth more than someone who has never servedIt's a very simple assessment of their ability to determine what is right and wrong.
horse sh!t the president can send the military anywhere there point of view is more relvantI disagree, as I've stated above, and if you wanna play that game I'll go a step further. Only combat veterans view points on foreign policy are worth more, and I'm not talking about some pog on a fob or someone stationed in Kuwait, I'm talking about actual combat veterans.