New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Wacky GOP House member: Schiff must testify!

Bugsy McGurk

President

worldlymrb

Revenge
Wacky GOP House member: Schiff must testify!
Surly Schiff has nothing to hide by testifying and would never obstruct justice with fake parodies to be peddled as fact like he did in his opening statement at the partisan impeachment hearings.

REF:
User Clip: Rep Schiff's "Parody" of President Trump | C-SPAN.org
Sep 26, 2019 · September 26, 2019 | Clip Of Acting DNI Maguire Testimony on Whistleblower Complaint This clip, title, and description were not created by C-SPAN. ... Rep Schiff (D-CA) reads his opening statement which includes quotes of a mafia-like shakedown by the President of the United States
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
You agree with that GOP wackjob? Those who witnessed the events need not testify, and a congressman who didn’t witness the events must testify?

Can you explain your “thinking” on that?

;-)
Prove they witnessed the call or dodge...………...

The elephant at pile of schiff circus is fixing to step on him

:)
 

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
then surely you think Trump, Mulvaney Pompeo, and Guliani must testify under oath first right......because unlike Schiff they were actually involved in the events in question.

What are you afraid of?
Trump doesn't have to testify
He's cannot be compiled to testify Constitutional right.
 

FakeName

Governor
Trump doesn't have to testify
He's cannot be compiled to testify Constitutional right.
constitutional right? lol

Clinton testified.

What are you afraid of?

And what about people that were involved like Mulvaney, Pompeo and Guliani? Surely you want to hear from them before you hear from people who weren't part of it like Schiff right.
 

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
constitutional right? lol

Clinton testified.

What are you afraid of?

And what about people that were involved like Mulvaney, Pompeo and Guliani? Surely you want to hear from them before you hear from people who weren't part of it like Schiff right.
Clinton didn't have to testify maybe it would have been better if he hadn't
 

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
Which one was the "star" witness?

And you do realize that there is more to this than one phone call right?
Didn't you watch any of the inquiry? If you did I'm not answering your question if you didn't maybe you should review the video's of the inquiry. There you will find that answer.
Maybe they should have called other witnesses that witnessed those phone calls you believe happened.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Surly Schiff has nothing to hide by testifying and would never obstruct justice with fake parodies to be peddled as fact like he did in his opening statement at the partisan impeachment hearings.

REF:
User Clip: Rep Schiff's "Parody" of President Trump | C-SPAN.org
Sep 26, 2019 · September 26, 2019 | Clip Of Acting DNI Maguire Testimony on Whistleblower Complaint This clip, title, and description were not created by C-SPAN. ... Rep Schiff (D-CA) reads his opening statement which includes quotes of a mafia-like shakedown by the President of the United States
Schiff spoke on national television. No need to have him testify as to what he said.

Got any other half assed reason to have Schiff testify?
 
Last edited:

Dino

Russian Asset
You agree with that GOP wackjob? Those who witnessed the events need not testify, and a congressman who didn’t witness the events must testify?

Can you explain your “thinking” on that?

;-)
Schiff doesn’t deserve executive privilege.
 

FakeName

Governor
Didn't you watch any of the inquiry? If you did I'm not answering your question if you didn't maybe you should review the video's of the inquiry. There you will find that answer.
Maybe they should have called other witnesses that witnessed those phone calls you believe happened.
Yep. I thought all the witnesses were important in their way.

Which was supposed to be the Star?
 

FakeName

Governor
Didn't you watch any of the inquiry? If you did I'm not answering your question if you didn't maybe you should review the video's of the inquiry. There you will find that answer.
Maybe they should have called other witnesses that witnessed those phone calls you believe happened.
Vindman was on the call.

You don't consider him the "Star" though?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Schiff spoke on national television. No need to have him testify as to what he said.

Got any other half assed reason to have Schiff testify?
Slick did also...…….how'd that work out for 2nd impeached President in history?
 
Top