Constitutional Sheepdog
][][][%er!!!!!!!
It was mentioned on day one you failIt was mentioned by that look Republican. Not by anyone else.
Hint: Him saying it doesn't make it true.
Those Republicans would know better than you.
It was mentioned on day one you failIt was mentioned by that look Republican. Not by anyone else.
Hint: Him saying it doesn't make it true.
So you won't tell me who YOU ARE claiming was their star witness?It was mentioned on day one you fail
Those Republicans would know better than you.
You know who the star witness was the first two they set the tone of the inquirySo you won't tell me who YOU ARE claiming was their star witness?
Wierd, but your choice.
I thought there was no star witness and that each and every one was important in what they contributed.
Maybe he could bring the expense report for the intel committee from Nunes' trip the Vienna and testify about how it was part of the frame up of Biden.This wackjob, Collins, is actually the ranking GOP member of the Judiciary Committee.
Got that, sports fans? This guy is fine with Trump and his bagmen not testifying, although they witnessed the events in question, and he demands that Schiff testify, although he did not witness the events in question.
Just another day in GOP la-la land.
;-)
https://www.axios.com/judiciary-republican-schiff-demands-testify-impeachment-hearing-163194eb-29dc-480d-a838-c1ab581f67a5.html
You are the one that won't answer a simple question.You know who the star witness was the first two they set the tone of the inquiry
YOU FAILED.
You should read this.Clinton didn't have to testify maybe it would have been better if he hadn't
Day one the first two witnesses were identified as the star witnessesYou are the one that won't answer a simple question.
Your choice.
I thought they were all important.
Clinton didn't have to be at the inquiry no one can be compiled to testify against themselves.
So you are saying Trump should take the 5th?Clinton didn't have to be at the inquiry no one can be compiled to testify against themselves.
You are the one that won't answer a simple question.Day one the first two witnesses were identified as the star witnesses
You weren't paying attention
Once he has to admit he lied about not knowing the whistleblower, it's over for him.Yes Schiff must under oath testify
But you don't think Trump, Guliani, Mulvaney and Pompeo should testify under oath?Once he has to admit he lied about not knowing the whistleblower, it's over for him.
When did Bill Clinton.....or any sitting President for that matter ever testify under oath in Congress? Fake brain is more like it.
In an impeachment inquiry? LOLBut you don't think Trump, Guliani, Mulvaney and Pompeo should testify under oath?
I answered you the star witnesses were the first two in the inquiry that's how it's done.You are the one that won't answer a simple question.
Your choice.
I thought they were all important.
Nope he doesn't have to be thereIn an impeachment inquiry? LOL
Are you aware of how this works?
perfectly.In an impeachment inquiry? LOL
Are you aware of how this works?
Quit playing games. it would have been way more efficient to just answer the question.I answered you the star witnesses were the first two in the inquiry that's how it's done.
You didn't read the citation I gave you obviously.Nope he doesn't have to be there
Again your fake citation is irrelevant the president does not have to participate in this witch huntYou didn't read the citation I gave you obviously.
And what is he afraid of?