Menu
New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

We got Campaign Finance Charges

S

SoccerMom

Mayor
ObamacareForever said:
Hot! Hot! Hot!
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/florida-businessmen-who-helped-giuliani-ukraine-arrested-campaign-finance-charges-n1064606

Ties to Guiliani, and the Ukrainian bullshit conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...
Campaign finance violations are a civil matter, and handled by the FEC. If, in fact, they have been arrested, their rights have been violated and they will be freed to return home to Europe.
Read the story, the candidates didn't know about this. We have proof that Hillary and Obama both took foreign donations.
You have nothing, my friend. Zero.
 
JuliefromOhio

JuliefromOhio

President
Supporting Member
Trump already lied and said he'd never met these crooks.



This will open the flood gates. SDNY is on a roll.
 
E

EatTheRich

President
UPNYA2 said:
Uhhhhhhhh……….OK?

The article that YOU linked us to clearly states;
"The defendants deceived "the candidates, campaigns, federal regulators, and the public...", does it not?

So why so giddy? Everyone was deceived?

OH, but wait......It also stated they made, "llegal straw donations to a Trump super PAC"!!!!!!

Huh!? HUH!?!!? Yeah!

Impressed yet? What does that mean exactly?
That anything done wrong by anyone who contributes to a super PAC is a reflection of and evidence that the candidate is guilty of the same thing or what?

And then there is the part where it says, "The purpose of these donations, ..was to ..advance the "personal financial interests of at least one Ukrainian government official with whom they were working."

Not Trump...….


I don't know sport model, this seems to have all of the makings of another nothing burger.

"Hot! Hot! Hot!" my ass...…
More like, say, luke warm, at BEST. But good luck riding this as far as it will take you. Check with you again after we see the NEXT "big thing" that you dems/libs hope will finally overturn the 2016 election.
Click to expand...
And why would it help the personal financial interests of a Ukrainian oligarch to have donations made to the Trump campaign?
 
Mick

Mick

The Right is always right
Spamature said:
According to Mueller, yes.
Click to expand...
According to Mueller, no:

“The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with [Russia’s] interference operation.”

Takes a very mentally ill person to not understand that quote.

:D
 
Last edited:
Spamature

Spamature

President
Mick said:
According to Mueller, no:

“The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with [Russia’s] interference operation.”

Takes a very mentally ill person to not understand that quote.

:D
Click to expand...
How did he define "the Russian interference operation" ?

You won't post that part because it blows a hole in your boat.

Because you know your lie by omission is weak. That is why you keep posting the same thing over and over without context like some Faux Noise, right wing radio talking head who only gives the chumps and suckers part of the story.
 
Mick

Mick

The Right is always right
Spamature said:
How did he define "the Russian interference operation" ?

You won't post that part because it blows a hole in your boat.

Because you know your lie by omission is weak. That is why you keep posting the same thing over and over without context like some Faux Noise, right wing radio talking head who only gives the chumps and suckers part of the story.
Click to expand...

Then quote it, spambrain. We've already heard this line from you. Mueller didn't find Russian collusion because he purposely held himself back from looking where it really was at.....blah, blah, blah. It was humiliating enough for you the first time............but this is getting beyond pathetic now.

Lulz
 
Mick

Mick

The Right is always right
YouCantHandleDaTruth said:
or getting caught red handed soliciting collusion from Ukrainian president?

Yes?

Great, then Red Don solicited collusion or help from Russia in the last election too.
Click to expand...

What did the Ukrainian President say about your collusion accusation?

Oh yeah, nevermind, his feelings are getting in the way. You don't need facts because you have a conspiracy to yell about!

You are 0 for 2 on collusion now. Keep swinging for the fences our desperate, little guy.

:D
 
Spamature

Spamature

President
Mick said:
Then quote it, spambrain. We've already heard this line from you. Mueller didn't find Russian collusion because he purposely held himself back from looking where it really was at.....blah, blah, blah. It was humiliating enough for you the first time............but this is getting beyond pathetic now.

Lulz
Click to expand...
“the Special Counsel’s investigation determined that there were two main Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election. The first involved attempts by a Russian organization, the Internet Research Agency (IRA), to conduct disinformation and social media operations in the United States. … The second element involved the Russian government’s efforts to conduct hacking operations designed to gather and disseminate information to influence the election.”

So as you see. He only defines the Russian interference as the activities of the IRA and the hacking by Russian military intelligence.

Now that you know what you right wing talking heads won't tell you. You will not have to ask me to educate you again about the facts. All other contact he describes in the document are described as contact with Russian individuals, not the Russian govt. or the IRA. So they fall outside of the boundary he would consider to be collusion.

Tattoo it on your hand like Sarah Palin if you have to, because this is the last time I am going to explain it to you.
 
Nostra

Nostra

Governor
Spamature said:
“the Special Counsel’s investigation determined that there were two main Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election. The first involved attempts by a Russian organization, the Internet Research Agency (IRA), to conduct disinformation and social media operations in the United States. … The second element involved the Russian government’s efforts to conduct hacking operations designed to gather and disseminate information to influence the election.”

So as you see. He only defines the Russian interference as the activities of the IRA and the hacking by Russian military intelligence.

Now that you know what you right wing talking heads won't tell you. You will not have to ask me to educate you again about the facts. All other contact he describes in the document are described as contact with Russian individuals, not the Russian govt. or the IRA. So they fall outside of the boundary he would consider to be collusion.

Tattoo it on your hand like Sarah Palin if you have to, because this is the last time I am going to explain it to you.
Click to expand...
All investigations determined there was ZERO EVIDENCE A SINGLE VOTE WAS CHANGED.

How many times does that need to be explained to you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top