Weak Men Are More Likely To Be Socialists

[Deleted member 21794]

Can anyone say they're shocked by this story? It makes perfect sense. Weak men, really, weak people, are more likely to want to rely on others to provide for them. What a shocker, yes? While this study covers physically weak men, I believe this applies to people of both sexes (and yes leftists, there are only two sexes) who are weak either physically or in character. I believe the study's scope is limited in scope at least in part by the funds and/or complexity of approaching this logic from a broader perspective.

I am all for helping those truly in need. But does anyone here really believe 43,000,000 Americans need help feeding themselves? Of course most of them don't. They are weak people. Weak in character.

And ever notice how the Democratic Party attracts the biggest losers? Coincidence? Of course not. The Democratic Party/American Left is home for the various dregs of society. How can a political party remain strong when their platform attracts only the weak and the losers? Is it any wonder Democrats are losing so many elections?

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/new-study-finds-wimpier-guys-are-more-likely-be-socialists

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

I agree they also have to depend on someone for their necessities of life.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

I agree they also have to depend on someone for their necessities of life.

Yep, so go socialist just in case you can't or won't provide for yourself. Just reach into someone else's pocket!

Leftists are pure filth.

 

[RickWA]

Yep, so go socialist just in case you can't or won't provide for yourself. Just reach into someone else's pocket!

Leftists are pure filth.

Goes hand-in-hand with the new popularity of male "rompers" in men's fashion.

Freaks. Lisping, wheezing, underachieving, gender-confused weirdos...

:-/

 

[Raoul_Luke]

The notion that an unemployable drug addict can command his gainfully employed neighbors to pay his way in life, is nothing less than a form of slavery.

 

[connieb]

Can anyone say they're shocked by this story? It makes perfect sense. Weak men, really, weak people, are more likely to want to rely on others to provide for them. What a shocker, yes? While this study covers physically weak men, I believe this applies to people of both sexes (and yes leftists, there are only two sexes) who are weak either physically or in character. I believe the study's scope is limited in scope at least in part by the funds and/or complexity of approaching this logic from a broader perspective.

I am all for helping those truly in need. But does anyone here really believe 43,000,000 Americans need help feeding themselves? Of course most of them don't. They are weak people. Weak in character.

And ever notice how the Democratic Party attracts the biggest losers? Coincidence? Of course not. The Democratic Party/American Left is home for the various dregs of society. How can a political party remain strong when their platform attracts only the weak and the losers? Is it any wonder Democrats are losing so many elections?

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/new-study-finds-wimpier-guys-are-more-likely-be-socialists

That's

Can anyone say they're shocked by this story? It makes perfect sense. Weak men, really, weak people, are more likely to want to rely on others to provide for them. What a shocker, yes? While this study covers physically weak men, I believe this applies to people of both sexes (and yes leftists, there are only two sexes) who are weak either physically or in character. I believe the study's scope is limited in scope at least in part by the funds and/or complexity of approaching this logic from a broader perspective.

I am all for helping those truly in need. But does anyone here really believe 43,000,000 Americans need help feeding themselves? Of course most of them don't. They are weak people. Weak in character.

And ever notice how the Democratic Party attracts the biggest losers? Coincidence? Of course not. The Democratic Party/American Left is home for the various dregs of society. How can a political party remain strong when their platform attracts only the weak and the losers? Is it any wonder Democrats are losing so many elections?

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/new-study-finds-wimpier-guys-are-more-likely-be-socialists

This is of course intuitive. It is always the weak and needy that benefit from collectivism the most and this why they seek it so diligently. Indeed there is often a benefit of piling resources. If I have a plow and you have a horse we make a good team. But when the alliance is materially unequal. You have a horse and plow and all I bring to the table are hungry mouths to feed, there is no point in an alignment.

But that has been part of the worst downside of the rise of single parent (women primarily) households is the rise of the uber feminized man. They are weak and pathetic and useless largely. They lack the competitive spirit that is breed into boys with fathers because a boys first competition and role model is his dad. Instead they either go off to prove their manhood in destructive ways like joining gangs or they become pusses who whine about how unfair life is for those who don't thrive on competition.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

That's


This is of course intuitive. It is always the weak and needy that benefit from collectivism the most and this why they seek it so diligently. Indeed there is often a benefit of piling resources. If I have a plow and you have a horse we make a good team. But when the alliance is materially unequal. You have a horse and plow and all I bring to the table are hungry mouths to feed, there is no point in an alignment.

But that has been part of the worst downside of the rise of single parent (women primarily) households is the rise of the uber feminized man. They are weak and pathetic and useless largely. They lack the competitive spirit that is breed into boys with fathers because a boys first competition and role model is his dad. Instead they either go off to prove their manhood in destructive ways like joining gangs or they become pusses who whine about how unfair life is for those who don't thrive on competition.

And of course, the horse and the plow analogy is based on individuals volunteering to make an alliance. Leftists are either too dishonest or too f*cking stupid to understand that the core the dynamics changes when the "alliance" is by government force.

I believe the feminization of men is all about control. Pussified men are easier to control:

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Yep, so go socialist just in case you can't or won't provide for yourself. Just reach into someone else's pocket!

Leftists are pure filth.

Pretty much takers and not givers reminds me of Locust

 

[BitterPill]

Can anyone say they're shocked by this story? It makes perfect sense. Weak men, really, weak people, are more likely to want to rely on others to provide for them. What a shocker, yes? While this study covers physically weak men, I believe this applies to people of both sexes (and yes leftists, there are only two sexes) who are weak either physically or in character. I believe the study's scope is limited in scope at least in part by the funds and/or complexity of approaching this logic from a broader perspective.

I am all for helping those truly in need. But does anyone here really believe 43,000,000 Americans need help feeding themselves? Of course most of them don't. They are weak people. Weak in character.

And ever notice how the Democratic Party attracts the biggest losers? Coincidence? Of course not. The Democratic Party/American Left is home for the various dregs of society. How can a political party remain strong when their platform attracts only the weak and the losers? Is it any wonder Democrats are losing so many elections?

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/new-study-finds-wimpier-guys-are-more-likely-be-socialists

Democrats are Thinkers, and Thinkers are weak.

 

[4/15]

All I can say is it is the conservative republicans who are leeches in construction. As for socialism it is a nice thing to think about but will never be a viable political situation. To many conservative fascists that want every dime they can steal/con from anyone dumb enough to believe them. They do not WORK for living that is my experience.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

All I can say is it is the conservative republicans who are leeches in construction. As for socialism it is a nice thing to think about but will never be a viable political situation. To many conservative fascists that want every dime they can steal/con from anyone dumb enough to believe them. They do not WORK for living that is my experience.

Conservative Republicans like who?

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

All I can say is it is the conservative republicans who are leeches in construction. As for socialism it is a nice thing to think about but will never be a viable political situation. To many conservative fascists that want every dime they can steal/con from anyone dumb enough to believe them. They do not WORK for living that is my experience.

You really don't know what you are talking about lol

 

[Deleted member 21794]

You really don't know what you are talking about lol

Yep, it looks like we've got another Barack Obama on our hands- just speaks some jive he thinks sounds right at the moment, without an ounce of consideration as to its accuracy or truthfulness.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Yep, it looks like we've got another Barack Obama on our hands- just speaks some jive he thinks sounds right at the moment, without an ounce of consideration as to its accuracy or truthfulness.

Yep 4/15 who uses that as a moniker unless they are trying to say that's their payday. the day they steal Americans wealth. One of the dependents of America.

 

[RickWA]

The notion that an unemployable drug addict can command his gainfully employed neighbors to pay his way in life, is nothing less than a form of slavery.

No one take this the wrong way, but in more normal times our society was self-correcting. Goofy stuff was properly stigmatized. Laziness, mooching, dressing like some princess-with-five'oclock shadow, etc...these things were met with social mores that drove them into hiding (or into freakshow enclaves like the Castro, the French Quarter, etc.).

And, when the subtle nudge of normal social convention could not be conveyed culturally...a pickup truck chock full of flannel-clad, bat-wielding good ol' boys would look after it...

Ok, buttboys...queue the chorus of wrist-flitting safe-spacers with the obligatory sissified non-sequiturs... waxing both Godwinian and Jim Crowian themes.

Do you think our lefty twinks in this forum roll their R's to compensate for the lisp?

 

[Deleted member 21794]

No one take this the wrong way, but in more normal times our society was self-correcting. Goofy stuff was properly stigmatized. Laziness, mooching, dressing like some princess-with-five'oclock shadow, etc...these things were met with social mores that drove them into hiding (or into freakshow enclaves like the Castro, the French Quarter, etc.).

And, when the subtle nudge of normal social convention could not be conveyed culturally...a pickup truck chock full of flannel-clad, bat-wielding good ol' boys would look after it...

Ok, buttboys...queue the chorus of wrist-flitting safe-spacers with the obligatory sissified non-sequiturs... waxing both Godwinian and Jim Crowian themes.

Do you think our lefty twinks in this forum roll their R's to compensate for the lisp?

I don't think there's a wrong way to take what you posted. However, I concede you are more astute when it comes to analyzing the deficiencies of the leftist brain.

Now... you raise a good point about society having been somewhat self-correcting. Society used to decide and correct. Now it's evolved to a small, but loud contingent of freakazoids, amplified by the leftist media, who have taken over that task.

I think this is part of what Trump tapped into as a candidate: he somewhat represents the normal, working Americans who have been somewhat marginalized the dregs of society.

How OWS and the Tea Party were portrayed by the media is a fine example of what went wrong. The savage OWS dope fiends, parasites, molesters and losers were portrayed as patriots and the Tea Party portrayed as racist savages. Of course, we all know it's the OWS grunge who represent the very worst of American demographics.

 

[RickWA]

I don't think there's a wrong way to take what you posted. However, I concede you are more astute when it comes to analyzing the deficiencies of the leftist brain.

Now... you raise a good point about society having been somewhat self-correcting. Society used to decide and correct. Now it's evolved to a small, but loud contingent of freakazoids, amplified by the leftist media, who have taken over that task.

I think this is part of what Trump tapped into as a candidate: he somewhat represents the normal, working Americans who have been somewhat marginalized the dregs of society.

How OWS and the Tea Party were portrayed by the media is a fine example of what went wrong. The savage OWS dope fiends, parasites, molesters and losers were portrayed as patriots and the Tea Party portrayed as racist savages. Of course, we all know it's the OWS grunge who represent the very worst of American demographics.

Well...ya know...that squad car isn't gonna just crap on itself...

"To protect and to defecate".

 

[4/15]

Yep, it looks like we've got another Barack Obama on our hands- just speaks some jive he thinks sounds right at the moment, without an ounce of consideration as to its accuracy or truthfulness.

The person you describe is Trumputin. I know what I am speaking of and you, ha ha, don't. Every conservative republican I have ever met was a leech looking for the easy money. There work ethic was just like trumputins, sell bogus education and go bankrupt so you don't get sued.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

The person you describe is Trumputin. I know what I am speaking of and you, ha ha, don't. Every conservative republican I have ever met was a leech looking for the easy money. There work ethic was just like trumputins, sell bogus education and go bankrupt so you don't get sued.

You are a bigot.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

The person you describe is Trumputin. I know what I am speaking of and you, ha ha, don't. Every conservative republican I have ever met was a leech looking for the easy money. There work ethic was just like trumputins, sell bogus education and go bankrupt so you don't get sued.

Translation: Every conservative Republican I've met has been a savvy businessman and I keep getting stuck doing the labor.