What does this mean?

[Drumcollie]

It's the typical, let's switch the story and use the old, (another, but how about Obama) routine, IMO

I don't see in the pic what others are suggesting/claim they can see.

View attachment 43738

Wasn't Obama too old for Jared? But Doesn't NAMBLA support the Democrats.

Obama appointee lauded NAMBLA figure
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-appointee-lauded-nambla-figure
Hay was not an employee or official of NAMBLA, but was during his later years, according to his entry on Wikipedia, a frequent defender of the group, including this 1983 statemen

 

[llovejim]

Here is the info on it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7229027/President-Trump-banned-Jeffery-Epstein-Mar-Lago-sexually-assaulted-underage-girl.html

It appears it was in 2000.

It's all a bunch of nothing but political fodder.

if epstein was barred in 2000, then why did enabler trump say this about epstein in 2002?

The case brings renewed scrutiny to Epstein’s apparent friendship with Trump, who spoke highly of the financier to New York magazine in 2002.

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump said. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

you do not read and retain information very well do you? you should change your screen name to "The Forgetter" from "The Thinker." You forget stuff all the time but you never think.

 

[Drumcollie]

if epstein was barred in 2000, then why did enabler trump say this about epstein in 2002?

The case brings renewed scrutiny to Epstein’s apparent friendship with Trump, who spoke highly of the financier to New York magazine in 2002.

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump said. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

you do not read and retain information very well do you? you should change your screen name to "The Forgetter" from "The Thinker." You forget stuff all the time but you never think.

Can't read...Use proper English.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

It means lots of 'yeah but trump' whataboutisms

Triggering the demented to babble on about Trump.

Odd, isn't it ?[/QUOTE]


Looks like I was correct !

 

[llovejim]

Wasn't Obama too old for Jared? But Doesn't NAMBLA support the Democrats.

Obama appointee lauded NAMBLA figure
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-appointee-lauded-nambla-figure
Hay was not an employee or official of NAMBLA, but was during his later years, according to his entry on Wikipedia, a frequent defender of the group, including this 1983 statemen

your link does not work, i guess even the washington examiner realized what a slimy lie it was and had it taken down. it is telling that to try and smear obama, you smear someone he appointed because he "showed support (whatever that means)" for some incredibly gay 80 year old gay dude. in short, obama is guilty of something because one of his minor appointees apparently said he supported some gay activist who was one of the first gay activists in the world.....way to reach!! that is so fair!!
neo nazis support republicans. does that mean the republican party endorses neo-nazis? and where does NAMBLA endorse democrats? why would they? most pedophiles are republicans, according to those caught and prosecuted.

most kkk members endorse republicans and are republicans. most scam televangelist fake christians support fake christian republicans. most white people without a high school education support republicans. most dumbshit science deniers support republicans. most bigots support republicans.

the washington examiner is a right wing rag. it occasionally tells the truth, but only when it has to. it is like fox, only even less credible. no wonder you use it as a source. you are very dishonest and biased.

 

[llovejim]

Buzz kill.

fox channel.

 

[llovejim]

you're on target.

the picture doesnt say anything negative. it.s just a picture

throw in a few pictures and quotes about what a great guy he is and how he likes them on the young side, and how he supported roy moore when he admitted asking moms when he was 30 years old if he could date their daughters and the many times trump has made comments about how if under age girls were just a few years older he would be dating them, then compare it to one pic of obama standing next to the Subway dude, you get a sense of how silly the comparison is. really, really, stretching it to the limit.

 

[PhilFish]

throw in a few pictures and quotes about what a great guy he is and how he likes them on the young side, and how he supported roy moore when he admitted asking moms when he was 30 years old if he could date their daughters and the many times trump has made comments about how if under age girls were just a few years older he would be dating them, then compare it to one pic of obama standing next to the Subway dude, you get a sense of how silly the comparison is. really, really, stretching it to the limit.

Yet..a child on her father's lap ...that's a given...

Right?

 

[llovejim]

Yet..a child on her father's lap ...that's a given...

Right?

yeah!! nothing at all creepy about that picture. you are incredibly honest and observant. you would make a fine moderator.

 

[PhilFish]

yeah!! nothing at all creepy about that picture. you are incredibly honest and observant. you would make a fine moderator.

ching.

 

[llovejim]

Why did you feel it necessary to post a screed?

why do you feel it necessary to define telling the truth about what a huge difference there is between obama posing with a nerdy subway spokesman, not hanging around with him, never saying what a great guy he is and how he likes them young, when that nerdy guy later freaked everybody out by being exposed as a pedophile to many pics of trump with high flying playboy party dude Epstein and saying he was a great guy and likes his women young, and he turns out to be a perv, as a screed? why does the truth bother you so much?

 

[PhilFish]

why do you feel it necessary to define telling the truth about what a huge difference there is between obama posing with a nerdy subway spokesman, not hanging around with him, never saying what a great guy he is and how he likes them young, when that nerdy guy later freaked everybody out by being exposed as a pedophile to many pics of trump with high flying playboy party dude Epstein and saying he was a great guy and likes his women young, and he turns out to be a perv, as a screed? why does the truth bother you so much?

truth doesnt bother me in the slightest.

does trump bang his daughter?

 

[llovejim]

truth doesnt bother me in the slightest.

does trump bang his daughter?

i surely hope not. i do believe he has said some incredibly creepy crap about how good looking she is, how hot she is, how if he were not her dad he might be dating her. that is not normal. it may not be all the way over to sick or illegal, but it sure is creepy and abnormal. the pics of him grabbing her in more intimate ways than would be expected are all over the internet. the quotes of him talking about how hot she is and agreeing with Stern here-

In the 2004 interview with Stern, Trump tells the host that "My daughter is beautiful, Ivanka," to which Stern interjects, “by the way, your daughter.” Trump finishes Stern’s sentence by repeating “she’s beautiful.”

“Can I say this? A piece of ass,” Stern says in the clip. “Yeah,” Trump replies.

In another clip uncovered by CNN, this one from 2006, Stern asks Trump, “did your daughter get breast implants?” The real estate mogul replied that “no, she didn’t. I mean, I would know if she did. The answer is no. Why, did she look a little more stacked?”

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-ivanka-piece-of-ass-howard-stern-229376

 

[PhilFish]

i believe you are lying if you say you do not find this picture of trump and his daughter creepy. try to be honest...goddamn!! how hard is that?

View attachment 43742

i havent expressed any opinion on it other than to challenge those positing that he is engaged in an paedophilic and incestuous encounter.

is he engaging in such a thing in this photo?

you seem to call for truth a lot.

go on...so challenged.

 

[llovejim]

i havent expressed any opinion on it other than to challenge those positing that he is engaged in an paedophilic and incestuous encounter.

is he engaging in such a thing in this photo?

you seem to call for truth a lot.

go on...so challenged.

all i said was that it is a creepy picture. i know no man personally that would ever pose for such a picture like that with his daughter. ever. period. maybe you do. maybe for some reason trump voters and even some who are not see nothing wrong with a young daughter in a skintight miniskirt lounging on her dad's lap, looking adoringly into his creepy face, with her hand caressing his face.

 

[PhilFish]

I don't keep it for personal reasons, it is all over the internet if you google trump being a creepy freak with his young daughter on a statue of two parrots doing the wild thing. it is fun to post a pic showing how creepy trump is and then watching his gutless stooges try to defend it. like now-

View attachment 43743

creepy is an adult (presumably) reposting a picture of a man and his young daughter and positing (repeatedly) that there is some sexual connotation there..

in which case, let's apply rule 8.


Are you posting adult content, and insinuating this is a graphic image of copulation and or a paedophilic encounter, and wilfully bandying it about the board?

 

[PhilFish]

Alert:

If you contend that an image you are posting is a depiction of incestuous, paedophilic, or copulatory in nature.. said posting will be scrubbed and the user banned.

fair warning.

 

[llovejim]

creepy is an adult (presumably) reposting a picture of a man and his young daughter and positing (repeatedly) that there is some sexual connotation there..

in which case, let's apply rule 8.


Are you posting adult content, and insinuating this is a graphic image of copulation and or a paedophilic encounter, and wilfully bandying it about the board?

no, you are just parsing stupid shit crap like a biased clown. see the difference? even the prudes who censored everything possible back in the 50's would never call that pic of trump and his daughter porn, but of course there is some sexual connotation there, as in a mini-skirt that shows 95% of her legs, a tight top clearly indicating her headlights are on, the adoring look she is giving the creep, and her hand caressing his ugly face. porn? no. creepy? to the max. sexual connotation? so much even a dumbass trump stooge can see it, that is what makes it creepy.

 

[PhilFish]

no, you are just parsing stupid shit crap like a biased clown. see the difference? even the prudes who censored everything possible back in the 50's would never call that pic of trump and his daughter porn, but of course there is some sexual connotation there, as in a mini-skirt that shows 95% of her legs, a tight top clearly indicating her headlights are on, the adoring look she is giving the creep, and her hand caressing his ugly face. porn? no. creepy? to the max. sexual connotation? so much even a dumbass trump stooge can see it, that is what makes it creepy.

nope.

i'm calling you on your paedophilic bent, and you're losing your shit.


i'll try again...is trump copulating with his minor child in the creepy photographs you keep festooning the board with?

 

[Drumcollie]

throw in a few pictures and quotes about what a great guy he is and how he likes them on the young side, and how he supported roy moore when he admitted asking moms when he was 30 years old if he could date their daughters and the many times trump has made comments about how if under age girls were just a few years older he would be dating them, then compare it to one pic of obama standing next to the Subway dude, you get a sense of how silly the comparison is. really, really, stretching it to the limit.

Could you write properly sop your point can be understood?