What does this mean?

[Dawg]

The idiots who can't see it are the same idiots who think Donald is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

So pictures of Barry O laying on couch with his girls isn't same...……..did you daughter ever set on your lap?

Mine did many times and I'd have killed the sonofabitch that make it sexual...………...

 

[BobbyT]

So pictures of Barry O laying on couch with his girls isn't same...……..did you daughter ever set on your lap?

Mine did many times and I'd have killed the sonofabitch that make it sexual...………...

What are you babbling about? My post has nothing to do with anyone sitting on anyone's lap.

 

[PhilFish]

Just like happened with all those "creepy Joe" posts.

Oh. Wait. It didn't.

What's that. There are copulatory references to Biden and his juvenile child?

 

[PhilFish]

If he's still on your member list...if you didn't permanently ban him, aren't you breaking the rules you expect us to abide by when you discuss him?

What rules are you claiming to abide by?

Is he here

 

[PhilFish]

I recall some conservative posters specifically DEFENDING Biden of that charge - on multiple occasions. I am one of them.

Not a SINGLE lefty stands up to this crap though.

Not ONE.

Zero.

Odd how all the moralizers appear, among whom dwell some of the worst offenders

 

[PhilFish]

If he's still on your member list...if you didn't permanently ban him, aren't you breaking the rules you expect us to abide by when you discuss him?

It's funny how you go to the rules, when you're not busy perpetuating the pedophilic incest tone that pervades this thread

Talk about indecent people. what kind of person preaches about the rules and then sets about bandying all manner of allegation of incest and pedophilia... Regardless of whom the person may be or how much we dislike them

 

[BobbyT]

What's that. There are copulatory references to Biden and his juvenile child?

Not his own child, but you didn't limit your threat to paedophilia, you said "paedophilic, incestuous, or copulatory." The posts I'm referencing named Biden "Joe. "

 

[PhilFish]

Not his own child, but you didn't limit your threat to paedophilia, you said "paedophilic, incestuous, or copulatory." The posts I'm referencing named Biden "Joe. "

i see. we're gonna parse?

do you find posts about a man having sex with his juvenile daughter, or insinuations thereof, appropriate?

we'll work are way through...

 

[BobbyT]

i see. we're gonna parse?

do you find posts about a man having sex with his juvenile daughter, or insinuations thereof, appropriate?

we'll work are way through...

Whether I think those posts are appropriate or inappropriate is merely my opinion and no more valid than anyone else's opinion. What they represent, along with the 'Obama is gay,' 'Biden is a [Unwelcome language removed],' photoshopped shit stains on the back of a pantsuit, photoshopped 'bulge' on a first lady, etc., is the gross coarsening of political dialogue on both sides of the aisle. What is inappropriate is repeatedly hounding and threatening a thread ban over one poster's instance of said coarsening while ignoring the others.

 

[PhilFish]

Whether I think those posts are appropriate or inappropriate is merely my opinion and no more valid than anyone else's opinion. What they represent, along with the 'Obama is gay,' 'Biden is a [Unwelcome language removed],' photoshopped shit stains on the back of a pantsuit, photoshopped 'bulge' on a first lady, etc., is the gross coarsening of political dialogue on both sides of the aisle. What is inappropriate is repeatedly hounding and threatening a thread ban over one poster's instance of said coarsening while ignoring the others.

gross is right. and pedophelia is the grossest of all.

 

[Addy]

What are others claiming they see?

Some of their responses are on page one.

 

[BobbyT]

gross is right. and pedophelia is the grossest of all.

Huh. if pedophilia is the grossest, why no banning threats for those threads about Biden?

 

[PhilFish]

Some of their responses are on page one.
View attachment 43758

yes.

 

[PhilFish]

Huh. if pedophilia is the grossest, why no banning threats for those threads about Biden?

there are threads about biden having sex with his child?

 

[BobbyT]

there are threads about biden having sex with his child?

Pedophilia is not limited to sex with one's child. That's incest.

 

[PhilFish]

Pedophilia is not sex with one's child. That's incest.

yes that is correct. it does not encompass incest, where said child is a juvenile?

 

[MrMike]

I'm hoping they'll find a list of people Epstein too to his teen age slave brothels. If Bill Clinton is one of them, I'm not surprised. If Donald J Trump is one of them...his cultists will claim it was all innocent...that the guy who paid porn stars for sex and had disgusting suggestive pictures with his daughter as well as saying sexual things about her, wouldn't think of doing such a thing...He was sent by God to lead this country, you know. That's how damn brainwashed the Trump cultists are.
Trump even admitted going into dressing rooms of young teens so he could see them naked. What kind of sick creep does that? "Boys will be boys".

Please show confirmation of your quote/claim from above:

"Trump even admitted going into dressing rooms of young teens so he could see them naked."

Would like to see where that quote originated.

Thanks

 

[BobbyT]

yes that is correct. it does not encompass incest, where said child is a juvenile?

It's not limited to sex with one's child. The Biden posts called him a pedophile. Why no thread bans for those?

 

[PhilFish]

It's not limited to sex with one's child. The Biden posts called him a pedophile. Why no thread bans for those?

I dont understand? because I am reacting here, I must have reacted to all other instances that have occurred as a prerequisite?.. or could it be that the tenor of this current one (you know..that Trump is grinding one out on his braless nude-legged daughter... has f'ed her, etc etc) is where we are today and trying to address?


or should all preceding have been visited beforehand, in order to address this one?

 

[BobbyT]

I dont understand? because I am reacting here, I must have reacted to all other instances that have occurred as a prerequisite?.. or could it be that the tenor of this current one (you know..that Trump is grinding one out on his braless nude-legged daughter... has f'ed her, etc etc) is where we are today and trying to address?


or should all preceding have been visited beforehand, in order to address this one?

No. I know why you're addressing this one but ignored the many, many examples that preceded it and why you repeatedly hounded that one poster out of this thread.