Arkady
President
In the wake of the unrest in Ferguson in late 2014, there was speculation that there'd be a "Ferguson Effect." The idea was that the heightened scrutiny around policing of minority communities would mean urban police would be more reluctant to intervene, resulting in an urban crime wave. Since we don't yet have full-year data for the nation as a whole for 2015, we can't say for sure what the year-on-year trends were following Ferguson. However, the FBI has released the nationwide data for January-June of 2015 (the Ferguson unrest was August 2014), comparing the trends to the same portion of 2014. The data is not in line with the theory, at least when it comes to the most serious violent crimes:
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/preliminary-semiannual-uniform-crime-report-januaryjune-2015/tables/table-1
As you can see, for metropolitan counties, the murder rate was down 4.1%, while it was up 10.4% for non-metropolitan counties. The rate of rape was up for both, but up over 13 times as much in non-metro areas. In addition, even within cities, the worst murder rate increase (17%) was for cities of less than 10,000 residents -- the smallest ones. For rape, the worst trend was for cities of 25,000-49,999, while the larger cities did better.
What we would have expected, based on the "Ferguson Effect" theory, was for overall trends of falling murder and rape to have continued in rural areas, while urban ones experienced a crime wave. Yet the trend for murder is the opposite, and for rape the problem seems to be getting worse faster in rural areas. Do people have explanations for this?
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/preliminary-semiannual-uniform-crime-report-januaryjune-2015/tables/table-1
As you can see, for metropolitan counties, the murder rate was down 4.1%, while it was up 10.4% for non-metropolitan counties. The rate of rape was up for both, but up over 13 times as much in non-metro areas. In addition, even within cities, the worst murder rate increase (17%) was for cities of less than 10,000 residents -- the smallest ones. For rape, the worst trend was for cities of 25,000-49,999, while the larger cities did better.
What we would have expected, based on the "Ferguson Effect" theory, was for overall trends of falling murder and rape to have continued in rural areas, while urban ones experienced a crime wave. Yet the trend for murder is the opposite, and for rape the problem seems to be getting worse faster in rural areas. Do people have explanations for this?
Last edited: