When will the Mueller investigation find something seriously damaging on Trump?

[UPNYA2]

Mueller says Manafort, as Trump’s campaign chair, surreptitiously provided Trump’s internal polling data to Kremlin operatives.

Further, Cohen’s guilty pleas include election law violations ordered by Trump, with Trump essentially being an unindicted co-conspirator.

Tell me how these things are not damaging to Trump himself.

"Tell me how these things are not damaging to Trump himself."

Glad to, sport.

Right now what you have is a case of a guy says another guy,(Trump’s campaign chair),
in secret, clandestine, covert, sneaky, (read: undocumented/recorded, unable to be confirmed), manner provided information that is not secret or classified to Kremlin operatives.

Further, you have guilty pleas of election law violations ordered by Trump but no actual documentation, no actual evidence.

You have a guy who you describe as, "essentially being an unindicted co-conspirator".

Let us break down THAT little term word-word, shall we?
"essentially being".
Means WHAT exactly? In matters of law one either is something or is not. What THIS tells us is, they don't know one way or the other. All they KNOW is that they "feel" or "believe", someone could be.....

"an unindicted co-conspirator"
"unindicted" means WHAT? Come on...…...think now...…...You know this one...……

Ding, Ding, DING! Right! Very good.

It means one is not indicted, as in not charged with anything.

So even when we combine all the elements contained on this loony-libby wish list, multiply the totle of them by 7, square that, (don't forget to carry the 9,,....), then double it again we are left with a heaping helping of jack-fukin'-SHIT.

Again, not exactly damning evidence against Trump himself, sorry.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

"Tell me how these things are not damaging to Trump himself."

Glad to, sport.

Right now what you have is a case of a guy says another guy,(Trump’s campaign chair),
in secret, clandestine, covert, sneaky, (read: undocumented/recorded, unable to be confirmed), manner provided information that is not secret or classified to Kremlin operatives.

Further, you have guilty pleas of election law violations ordered by Trump but no actual documentation, no actual evidence.

You have a guy who you describe as, "essentially being an unindicted co-conspirator".

Let us break down THAT little term word-word, shall we?
"essentially being".
Means WHAT exactly? In matters of law one either is something or is not. What THIS tells us is, they don't know one way or the other. All they KNOW is that they "feel" or "believe", someone could be.....

"an unindicted co-conspirator"
"unindicted" means WHAT? Come on...…...think now...…...You know this one...……

Ding, Ding, DING! Right! Very good.

It means one is not indicted, as in not charged with anything.

So even when we combine all the elements contained on this loony-libby wish list, multiply the totle of them by 7, square that, (don't forget to carry the 9,,....), then double it again we are left with a heaping helping of jack-fukin'-SHIT.

Again, not exactly damning evidence against Trump himself, sorry.

You question was whether the charges are damaging to Trump himself. I explained that for you. Your response is that the charges are baseless (even the charges to which Cohen plead guilty). That’s a different question than whether the charges are damaging. No accusations against Trump are damaging if you simply assume they’re baseless. But that’s a very dopey approach to the question.

 

[UPNYA2]

The idea that the existence of a person can be “illegal” is straight out of the Nazi playbook. Especially when most of them haven’t committed a crime. Hitler publicized actual crimes committed by people who happened to be Jews as part of his campaign of whipping up hatred of Jews. Just as VOICE publicized actual crimes committed by “illegals” to whip up hatred of illegals.

My point was that you, YOU, are labeling these people to be criminals when you refer to them as illegals, as you just did above;
"Just as VOICE publicized actual crimes committed by “illegals” to whip up hatred of illegals."

The problem you dems/libs have with trying to support, defend and promote these criminal invaders of our nation is you just can not convince everyone else that the actual definations of words can not apply in any instance they go against your beliefs or feelings.

Take these in this post for example.

For one to be an illegal one would have had to do something that was not legal.
If something is not legal it is against the law.
One who does something that is against the law has committed a crime.
One who has committed a crime is a criminal.

Now knowing all of this, why do you believe it is correct, proper or accurate to come on here and say, "Especially when most of them, (illegals), haven’t committed a crime'?
When by the very definition of the words tells us all otherwise?

You just refusing to admit it, you insisting on trying to label it anything but what it actually IS simply ain't gonna cut it, sport.

In other words, "That dawg won't hunt". Get another one.

 

[UPNYA2]

You question was whether the charges are damaging to Trump himself. I explained that for you. Your response is that the charges are baseless (even the charges to which Cohen plead guilty). That’s a different question than whether the charges are damaging. No accusations against Trump are damaging if you simply assume they’re baseless. But that’s a very dopey approach to the question.

Perhaps, but no more dopy than the liberal approach.

You know, the one where any and every thing questionable that any and every one who has ever, at any and every point in time, so much as been seen with or has spoken to your President is somehow magically a reflection of him personally and evidence he is unfit for the position the country elected him to serve.

So there is that to consider as well...……...

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Perhaps, but no more dopy than the liberal approach.

You know, the one where any and every thing questionable that any and every one who has ever, at any and every point in time, so much as been seen with or has spoken to your President is somehow magically a reflection of him personally and evidence he is unfit for the position the country elected him to serve.

So there is that to consider as well...……...

Your outright lying about “the liberal approach” is both tedious and deplorable.

 

[EatTheRich]

My point was that you, YOU, are labeling these people to be criminals when you refer to them as illegals, as you just did above;
"Just as VOICE publicized actual crimes committed by “illegals” to whip up hatred of illegals."

The problem you dems/libs have with trying to support, defend and promote these criminal invaders of our nation is you just can not convince everyone else that the actual definations of words can not apply in any instance they go against your beliefs or feelings.

Take these in this post for example.

For one to be an illegal one would have had to do something that was not legal.
If something is not legal it is against the law.
One who does something that is against the law has committed a crime.
One who has committed a crime is a criminal.

Now knowing all of this, why do you believe it is correct, proper or accurate to come on here and say, "Especially when most of them, (illegals), haven’t committed a crime'?
When by the very definition of the words tells us all otherwise?

You just refusing to admit it, you insisting on trying to label it anything but what it actually IS simply ain't gonna cut it, sport.

In other words, "That dawg won't hunt". Get another one.

Again, “illegals” is a propaganda term ... saying that you calling them “illegals” proves they break the law is like saying that if Hitler called people “filthy Jews” then it proved that they spread disease because everyone knows that filthy people spread disease.

 

[marvin martian]

Again, “illegals” is a propaganda term ... saying that you calling them “illegals” proves they break the law is like saying that if Hitler called people “filthy Jews” then it proved that they spread disease because everyone knows that filthy people spread disease.

People in the country illegally are breaking the law. Nothing you say will ever change that.

 

[EatTheRich]

People in the country illegally are breaking the law. Nothing you say will ever change that.

Jews were “illegals” in Nazi Germany too. I thought “process violations” didn’t count for you guys any more.

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

people who compare illegal immigrants in the US to the Jews in Germany during WWII are complete fvcking morons.

 

[EatTheRich]

people who compare illegal immigrants in the US to the Jews in Germany during WWII are complete fvcking morons.

Translation: I am embarrassed by the comparison because it makes me sound like a Nazi.

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

528 views, and only 3 libs (Kudos for being the 3rd, SD) with the balls to vote.

 

[EatTheRich]

528 views, and only 3 libs (Kudos for being the 3rd, SD) with the balls to vote.

I think many more would vote if the correct answer (it already has) were one of the options.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.esquire.com/news-politics/amp25948638/william-barr-obstruction-of-justice-trump-michael-cohen-perjury/

 

[Drumcollie]

What is the point of your link? Because Hitler publicized crimes by Jews and Trump publicized crimes by “illegals,” that makes him innocent of any possible crime?

You cannot make the link is the point to anything including Trump and Russia collusion.

I am not saying that Trump did not do anything... It just takes time and that would be at least 2 or three weeks to figure it all out.

 

[Drumcollie]

528 views, and only 3 libs (Kudos for being the 3rd, SD) with the balls to vote.

Sounds like the election of Donald Trump.

Honestly they are the silent vote. They are those that won't vote because they know the truth and they want another outcome. They voted with their silence.

 

[reason10]

They already have.

Yep. They finally found a photograph of Trump with two Russian agents.

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

Yep. They finally found a photograph of Trump with two Russian agents.

Hillary looks happy. I bet each one has a cheek..........

 

[reason10]

Nope. He told the truth. Trump didn’t rig the election. He and the Kremlin just illegally interfered with it. Which you support, right?

YOU ARE SO FULL OF SHIT. YOU ARE SUCH A FCKING (well, mods, I'm trying) LIAR. NONE OF THE STATES VOTER ROLLS WERE TAMPERED WITH. THE ONLY [Unwelcome language removed] WHO TRIED TO INTERFERE WITH THE ELECTION WERE HILLARY AND THE Obama.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/18/trump-seeks-hillary-clinton-christopher-steele-rus/

Trump, conservatives demand probe into Clinton-Steele-Moscow links
President Trump’s frustration last week over special counsel Robert Mueller not investigating the Democrats’ links to Russia election meddling is aimed at Christopher Steele, the British ex-spy who compiled and imported the unverified dossier.

“The only ‘Collusion’ is that of the Democrats with Russia and many others,” he tweeted Nov. 15.

Mr. Steele is a paid Democratic Party operative who spread among Washington power elites pre-Election Day Trump gossip originating from Moscow.

Mr. Mueller has made a theme of enforcing the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), which requires people working on behalf of foreigners to register with the Justice Department or face criminal liability. He also has charged Russian nationals with fraud against the U.S. by interfering in the 2016 election.

The Steele issue has reached Mr. Mueller. An attorney for one indicted Russian firm, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, accused Mr. Mueller of selective prosecution.

 

[Dawg]

I know, I know, ask me

Second Tuesday after Hell freezes over

 

[NinaS]

well, I see two Shit Listed posters have commented, but declined to actually express an opinion via the vote. Typical, expected.

Where's your vote? Practice what you preach. How the hell would anyone know when it's going to end and how it will end? Be patient...are you afraid?

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

Where's your vote? Practice what you preach. How the hell would anyone know when it's going to end and how it will end? Be patient...are you afraid?

you can check the vote list above, dumbass. Do you nee a lesson on how to use the board?

Where's YOUR vote? As of this posting, you have not voted. What are YOU afraid of, dipshit?