maybe if you had taken a law course, or had some knowledge of how trials and investigations work it would not puzzle you so. a foundation has to be laid, an opening statement, how one side is seeking to prove what a lying piece of shit extortionist trump is by using facts and sworn testimony, that could be further corroborated if the President and his henchmen did not obstruct justice, and how the other side is not even trying to defend what extortionist lying conman Trump did, they just blindly attack the process and hope the Trump voters at home somehow believe that is the same as defending by evidence that trump did not do what the facts show so blatantly, as in the Mulvaney video and the Sondland video. And the fact, Trump has forbidden any of those in his most inner circle who would have direct evidence testify under oath, because then their loyalty to his bullshit corruption might be overcome by their fear of going to jail for perjury under oath.
Do even trump voters not fully believe if Trump or his henchmen thought their testimony would help clear trump, he would be demanding they appear, and they would appear, both now and during the House Impeachment hearings?
why do trump voters try so hard to deny such obvious facts?
www.youtube.com › watch
Mick Mulvaney admits quid pro quo with Ukraine - YouTube
View attachment 47763
View attachment 47764▶ 6:44
Oct 18, 2019 - Uploaded by ABC News
The White House acting chief of staff said President Trump ordered him to withhold military aid in part to
www.youtube.com › watch
CLIP: Ambassado Sondland says there was Quid Pro Quo and
View attachment 47766
View attachment 47765▶ 2:54
Nov 20, 2019 - Uploaded by C-SPAN
In his opening statement at a House Intelligence Committee Impeachment Inquiry hearing, Ambassador ...