New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why isn't Lt. Col. Vindman being charged with treason...

D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
1. Trump criticized Obama...too much golf...laughable.
2. neither Obama and Clinton paid a doctor to avoid serving.
If you think Trump criticizing Obama for too much golf is laughable, what are your thoughts on Obama criticizing Bush for accumulating $4 trillion in debt?
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
You haven't answered shit.

Know why? Because you can't.

All you can do is lie. You can't list any crimes or the legal statutes.

You just got exposed AGAIN!
Your dodging is boring and lame.

Try to elevate your game and address what I said when answering your question.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Your trolling is boring and lame.

Try a new schtick.
Answering questions and pursuing discussion is not “schtick” or trolling. To the contrary, that would describe asking questions, ignoring the answers, and then asking the same questions again. Your M.O.
 
Answering questions and pursuing discussion is not “schtick” or trolling. To the contrary, that would describe asking questions, ignoring the answers, and then asking the same questions again. Your M.O.
You didn't answer my question.

Because you can't.

So there's that and all....

Bye troll. Enjoy your Sunday.
 
Your lying is atrocious...

View attachment 46160
I didn't ask for your opinions or the daily DNC talking points tard.

I asked you for the "crimes" he commited and the associated statutes. Like you know......real facts and shit.

You didn't answer because you can't. Trump has not been accused of any crimes. That means the only thing Vindman exposed was himself....... as a deep state hack.

You just continue to lie.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
I didn't ask for your opinions or the daily DNC talking points tard.

I asked you for the "crimes" he commited and the associated statutes. Like you know......real facts and shit.

You didn't answer because you can't. Trump has not been accused of any crimes. That means the only thing Vindman exposed was himself....... as a deep state hack.

You just continue to lie.
You asked what crimes he committed, I told you, and you just ignored what I said and asked the same question again. Textbook trolling. You got no game.

Respond to what I said if you can set aside your urge to troll.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
If you think Trump criticizing Obama for too much golf is laughable, what are your thoughts on Obama criticizing Bush for accumulating $4 trillion in debt?
of course you realize the difference between Bush's deficits and Obama's and Trump's. right? Cuz yer a "thinker". :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
I didn't ask for your opinions or the daily DNC talking points tard.

I asked you for the "crimes" he commited and the associated statutes. Like you know......real facts and shit.

You didn't answer because you can't. Trump has not been accused of any crimes. That means the only thing Vindman exposed was himself....... as a deep state hack.

You just continue to lie.
Obstruction
 

Spamature

President
Note the following additional excerpt from Vindman’s prepared statement: “….I was worried about the implications for the US government’s support of Ukraine…. I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained.”

Vindman’s concern is all about Ukraine without any explanation of why the United States would benefit from bilking the taxpayer to support a foreign deadbeat one more time. One wonders if Vindman was able to compose his statement without a snicker or two intruding. He does eventually go on to cover the always essential national security angle, claiming that “Since 2008, Russia has manifested an overtly aggressive foreign policy, leveraging military power and employing hybrid warfare to achieve its objectives of regional hegemony and global influence. Absent a deterrent to dissuade Russia from such aggression, there is an increased risk of further confrontations with the West. In this situation, a strong and independent Ukraine is critical to US national security interests because Ukraine is a frontline state and a bulwark against Russian aggression.”

The combined visions of Russia as an aggressive, expansionistic power coupled with the brave Ukrainians serving as a bastion of freedom is so absurd that it is hardly worth countering. Russia’s economy is about the size of Italy’s or Spain’s limiting its imperial ambitions, if they actually exist. Its alleged transgressions against Georgia and Ukraine were both provoked by the United States meddling in Eastern Europe, something that it had pledged not to do after the Soviet Union collapsed. Ukraine is less an important American ally than a welfare case, and no one knows that better than Vindman, but he is really speaking to his masters in the US Establishment when he repeats the conventional arguments.

It hardly seems possible, but Vindman then goes on to dig himself into a still deeper hole through his statement’s praise of the train wreck that is Ukraine. He writes “In spite of being under assault from Russia for more than five years, Ukraine has taken major steps towards integrating with the West. The US government policy community’s view is that the election of President Volodymyr Zelensky and the promise of reforms to eliminate corruption will lock in Ukraine’s Western-leaning trajectory, and allow Ukraine to realize its dream of a vibrant democracy and economic prosperity. The United States and Ukraine are and must remain strategic partners, working together to realize the shared vision of a stable, prosperous, and democratic Ukraine that is integrated into the Euro-Atlantic community.”

Alexander Vindman does not say or write that the incorporation of Ukraine into NATO is his actual objective, but his comments about “integrating with the West” and the “Euro-Atlantic community” clearly imply just that. The expansion of NATO up to Russia’s borders by the rascally Bill Clinton constituted one of the truly most momentous lost foreign policy opportunities of the twentieth century. The addition of Ukraine and Georgia to the alliance would magnify that error as both are vital national security interests for Moscow given their history and geography. Vindman should be regarded as a manifestation of the Deep State thinking that has brought so much grief to the United States over the past twenty years. Seen in that light, his testimony, wrapped in an air of sanctimoniousness and a uniform, should be regarded as little more than the conventional thinking that has produced foreign policy failure after failure.


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/deep-state-national-security-council-colonel-vindman-expert-agenda

This guy was clearly undermining POTUS to advance Ukraine's interests - that's treason, or at least was before Trump was elected...
Who wrote this article, Putin ?


Its alleged transgressions against Georgia and Ukraine

Alleged ?

Are you going to pretend Russia did not invade Georgia and that they didn't annex Crimea ?

Trump brings that up all of the time. Yet the author here is trying to pretend it never happened.
 

LeilaniMP

Empress
What about the Russian pig ass loving Obobo do you like so much?

YOU DO KNOW he DENIED military aid the the Ukrainians after Russia invaded Crimea don't you?

I sure someone so informed as you wouldn't forget that huh Jimmy?

Ukrainian President Poroshenko even came all the way to Washington to plead his case before a joint session of congress. But.....Obobo STEADFASTLY REFUSED TO HELP.

What a piece of shit right Jimmy? Obobo gave him food and blankets! What a fukn joke!

"In 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and began arming separatists in eastern Ukraine with tanks, armored vehicles and rocket launchers, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko came to Washington to plead for weapons to defend his country. In an impassioned address to a joint session of Congress — with Biden sitting directly behind him — Poroshenko said his country appreciated the nonlethal assistance he was getting, but declared “one cannot win a war with blankets.

The Obama-Biden administration was unmoved. The Wall Street Journal reported at the time that “President Barack Obama stuck to his refusal to provide weapons or other lethal military gear to Ukraine, despite a passionate appeal Thursday for help in fighting pro-Russian rebels by Ukraine’s president.” Why? The administration feared that lethal aid would provoke Moscow."

So what did the administration give him? Instead of RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades), we provided MREs (meals ready to eat) — food rations. As one frustrated former Pentagon official put it at the time, “What kind of message does that send anyway? We are sending MREs while they are being invaded by an aggressor.”


Answer......A message of weakness. Obobo is a pussified bitch. Like all leftists. Present company included.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/08/joe-biden-is-hypocrite-ukraine/

https://nypost.com/2019/10/09/sorry-joe-team-obama-refused-to-arm-ukraine-at-all/

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/10/trump_gave_ukraine_what_obama_withheld.html
"That's different"
 
Top