EatTheRich
President
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/was-law-separate-families-passed-1997/"I'm black" maybe in your mind but not in reality, IMO.
since you're so concerned
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/was-law-separate-families-passed-1997/"I'm black" maybe in your mind but not in reality, IMO.
since you're so concerned
Nope, I think the large majority of Democrats are lazy and ignorant.You do think the large majority of Black people are lazy and ignorant, though?
And since most Black Americans are Democrats, therefore ...JackDallas said: ↑
You won't see her on MSNBC and, no matter how much you deny it, she is not being ignored by 90% of the Black community.
Just because you choose to stay in the political party of the KKK, segregation, and Jim Crow, for the pennies they give you to vote democrat, doesn't mean all Black people are that lazy and ignorant.
Nope, I think the large majority of Democrats are lazy and ignorant.
He misspoke.
Yes, blacks who stay on the Democrat plantation are lazy and ignorant. White people who stay in the Democrat party are lazy, ignorant, and/or evil.And since most Black Americans are Democrats, therefore ...
When a Liberal says he misspoke, it means he lied.He misspoke.
So 90 plus percent of blacks are lazy and ignorant?Yes, blacks who stay on the Democrat plantation are lazy and ignorant. White people who stay in the Democrat party are lazy, ignorant, and/or evil.
There is something mentally wrong with anyone who remains a member of the Democrat Party, given the stance they have taken of late, and their acceptance of violence as a means of achieving their evil agenda.
If that's the number of blacks who vote Democrat, Yes, but many of them are getting smarter the closer we get to the 2020 election.So 90 plus percent of blacks are lazy and ignorant?
Snopes is not a reliable source of information.
Of course it is.Snopes is not a reliable source of information.
I have an idea that what I am talking about just boxed your arguments up and dumped them in the trash.You have no idea what we are talking about do you?
Immigration?
I have simply stated that the essence of capitalism is free markets. Any economic "system" that attempts to "control" markets isn't capitalism. So as soon as you start introducing socialist policies in a free market system, well, we're not in Galt's Gulch any more, there, Dorothy...I see you have redefined capitalism to mean something other than private ownership and market control over development. So be it. What country was once capitalist whose prior system you would like to restore?
So you think that the large majority of aBlacka are lazy and ignorant and have something wrong with them?Yes, blacks who stay on the Democrat plantation are lazy and ignorant. White people who stay in the Democrat party are lazy, ignorant, and/or evil.
There is something mentally wrong with anyone who remains a member of the Democrat Party, given the stance they have taken of late, and their acceptance of violence as a means of achieving their evil agenda.
They always show their work, you can check out whether their references check out for yourself.Snopes is not a reliable source of information.
Snopes is a Leftist hack site, managed by a fat ugly old bag of shit and her fat ugly husband. They are liars and pretenders.
What country was once capitalist whose system you would like to restore?I have simply stated that the essence of capitalism is free markets. Any economic "system" that attempts to "control" markets isn't capitalism. So as soon as you start introducing socialist policies in a free market system, well, we're not in Galt's Gulch any more, there, Dorothy...
The USA post emancipation was a pretty good example. The markets and people were both rather free, until the progressives decided to start labeling the successful "robber barons" and implement market controls to counter their success. They certainly didn't need "tremendous" state interference to ensure private property rights. The "bureaucracy" was (and is always) developed by the progressives to control (and thwart) free persons and markets. Your admission regarding the Stalinist regime proves that bureaucracy development isn't a function of the "free market."What country was once capitalist whose system you would like to restore?
Haven’t markets always required tremendous state interference in order to keep private property alive? Wasn’t bureaucracy developed by the bourgeois class to help it rule and haven’t the biggest bureaucracies (aside from the metasthesized Stalinist regime’s such as the Soviet Union, etc.) developed in the countries with the “free market” economies?
Really, seems to me they needed those buffalo soldiers to clear the way for those railroads and mines, lots of government jobs to address employment, and a welfare state to address the failures of free-market capitalism.The USA post emancipation was a pretty good example. The markets and people were both rather free, until the progressives decided to start labeling the successful "robber barons" and implement market controls to counter their success. They certainly didn't need "tremendous" state interference to ensure private property rights. The "bureaucracy" was (and is always) developed by the progressives to control (and thwart) free persons and markets. Your admission regarding the Stalinist regime proves that bureaucracy development isn't a function of the "free market."
I have checked them out. They always rubber stamp, rule TRUE, anything that reflects positively on a Liberal/Democrat subject and rule FALSE anything that reflects negatively on same.They always show their work, you can check out whether their references check out for yourself.
IF they stay in the Democrat Party...YES.So you think that the large majority of [aBlacka] (did you mean Blacks/) are lazy and ignorant and have something wrong with them?