New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why the "Trump's a Racist" Narrative Doesn't Hold Any Credibility

EatTheRich

President
That's a lie. It hasn't been but if the left keeps up their assault on American civilization then for the sake of cultural survival I could see why conservative politics would become racist. And I couldn't blame them. I'd blame you.
American civilization is profoundly racist. Combating racism absolutely requires huge changes to American civilization.
 
American civilization is profoundly racist. Combating racism absolutely requires huge changes to American civilization.
American civilization was no more racist than any other. In fact a lot less. And on its own, without any significant communist intervention, it has overcome racism as much as human nature will let man do so.

Your combating racism narrative if political crap talk to grab power. I mean steal power.
 

EatTheRich

President
American civilization was no more racist than any other. In fact a lot less. And on its own, without any significant communist intervention, it has overcome racism as much as human nature will let man do so.

Your combating racism narrative if political crap talk to grab power. I mean steal power.
So the civil rights movement in which communists played a crucial role had nothing to do with starting to overcome racism?
 
So, very much so?

And communists didn’t “infiltrate” the civil rights movement .., they revived, in the 20th century, a movement that was essentially dead.
Typical communist you work with lies and deceit (aka propaganda).

Fact.

upload_2019-8-15_21-25-2.png

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit the Democratic National Committee filed against the Trump campaign, the Russian government, WikiLeaks and various Trump campaign officials over alleged involvement in the hacking of Democratic Party email accounts during the 2016 presidential race.

U.S. District Judge John Koeltl rejected the central theory of the racketeering suit: that the Trump campaign, campaign aides and Trump allies abetted the theft of the emails by encouraging WikiLeaks to publish the messages and by urging they be released when they would be of maximum political benefit to then-candidate Donald Trump.

Koeltl said such actions were protected by the First Amendment when taken by people not involved in the actual hacking.


“Even if the documents had been provided directly to the Campaign [and] the Campaign defendants … they could have published the documents themselves without liability because they did not participate in the theft and the documents are of public concern,” the judge wrote in an 81-page opinion. “The DNC cannot hold these defendants liable for aiding and abetting publication when they would have been entitled to publish the stolen documents themselves without liability.”

The judge said the DNC’s suit did not allege that anyone beyond the Russian Federation took part in the hacking of the Democratic Party computer systems or email accounts. And he concluded that WikiLeaks could not legitimately be sued as a recipient of that information because what it released was of genuine public

“The DNC’s published internal communications allowed the American electorate to look behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United States during a presidential election,” Koeltl wrote. “This type of information is plainly of the type entitled to the strongest protection that the First Amendment offers.”

Koeltl, a Manhattan-based appointee of President Bill Clinton, also rejected the DNC’s contention that fundraising-related records amount to trade secrets that get special protection under the law.

“The DNC’s interest in keeping ‘donor lists’ and ‘fundraising strategies’ secret is dwarfed by the newsworthiness of the documents as a whole,” the judge wrote. “If WikiLeaks could be held liable for publishing documents concerning the DNC’s political financial and voter-engagement strategies simply because the DNC labels them ‘secret’ and trade secrets, then so could any newspaper or other media outlet.”

Koeltl also said U.S. courts were not the place for the DNC to seek damages against Russia over the hacking. “Relief from the alleged activities of the Russian Federation should be sought from the political branches of the Government and not from the courts,” the judge wrote.
...


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/30/dnc-lawsuit-trump-campaign-russia-email-hack-1441166
 

reason10

Mayor
gat any links to the people who said GHW Bush was a racist? Reagan started his campaign in a county known for the murder of civil rights workers and his welfare queen comment helped make that case.
The assholes who played the race card based on Bush's use of the Willie Horton fiasco under Dufuqus. For three whole years, that's all we heard from the drive-by media.

Bush is a racist because he played the Willie Horton card. '

And those ignorant edited forgot that it was originally candidate ALGORE in the primaries who first brought Horton up.

So your party is racist AND stupid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EatTheRich

President
Typical communist you work with lies and deceit (aka propaganda).

Fact.

View attachment 44396

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit the Democratic National Committee filed against the Trump campaign, the Russian government, WikiLeaks and various Trump campaign officials over alleged involvement in the hacking of Democratic Party email accounts during the 2016 presidential race.

U.S. District Judge John Koeltl rejected the central theory of the racketeering suit: that the Trump campaign, campaign aides and Trump allies abetted the theft of the emails by encouraging WikiLeaks to publish the messages and by urging they be released when they would be of maximum political benefit to then-candidate Donald Trump.

Koeltl said such actions were protected by the First Amendment when taken by people not involved in the actual hacking.


“Even if the documents had been provided directly to the Campaign [and] the Campaign defendants … they could have published the documents themselves without liability because they did not participate in the theft and the documents are of public concern,” the judge wrote in an 81-page opinion. “The DNC cannot hold these defendants liable for aiding and abetting publication when they would have been entitled to publish the stolen documents themselves without liability.”

The judge said the DNC’s suit did not allege that anyone beyond the Russian Federation took part in the hacking of the Democratic Party computer systems or email accounts. And he concluded that WikiLeaks could not legitimately be sued as a recipient of that information because what it released was of genuine public

“The DNC’s published internal communications allowed the American electorate to look behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United States during a presidential election,” Koeltl wrote. “This type of information is plainly of the type entitled to the strongest protection that the First Amendment offers.”

Koeltl, a Manhattan-based appointee of President Bill Clinton, also rejected the DNC’s contention that fundraising-related records amount to trade secrets that get special protection under the law.

“The DNC’s interest in keeping ‘donor lists’ and ‘fundraising strategies’ secret is dwarfed by the newsworthiness of the documents as a whole,” the judge wrote. “If WikiLeaks could be held liable for publishing documents concerning the DNC’s political financial and voter-engagement strategies simply because the DNC labels them ‘secret’ and trade secrets, then so could any newspaper or other media outlet.”

Koeltl also said U.S. courts were not the place for the DNC to seek damages against Russia over the hacking. “Relief from the alleged activities of the Russian Federation should be sought from the political branches of the Government and not from the courts,” the judge wrote.
...


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/30/dnc-lawsuit-trump-campaign-russia-email-hack-1441166
This doesn’t say the Russians didn’t help Trump. It says that the Trump campaign did nothing illegal by benefiting from Russian help.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Let’s start with the opportunity to live in a clean environment without paying through the nose. Blacks and whites pay the same amount on average for housing, but Blacks are twice as likely to live within 5 miles of a toxic waste dump.
You posted you live in the poor side of town, what toxic dump do you live within 5 miles of________
 
Top