New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why the "Trump's a Racist" Narrative Doesn't Hold Any Credibility

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
Race is an invention created around the 15th century to justify racial slavery and wars of racial conquest. It has no meaning outside the context of historical racism.
You & yours can go on believing that. The rest of us will believe ... whatchacallit ... reality. And while y'all are trying to convince yourselves and everyone else that short is long and up is down and race is a 15th century invention, we'll be celebrating diversity.
 

EatTheRich

President
It was as laughably stupid then, as it is now. Only a total moron would think it required one.

Say that claim out loud and see if you dont laugh like hell "Cuba, the freest democracy on earth'' ....o_O:rolleyes:
It’s laughable because the conventional wisdom is the one bought and paid for by the moneyed enemies of democracy.
 

John Doe

I detest liberalism
It’s laughable because the conventional wisdom is the one bought and paid for by the moneyed enemies of democracy.
It's so damn great, they make rafts of garbage and risk their lives to cross 90 miles of shark infested sea.

"I hate America so bad, I'm going to the keys to launch a raft of garbage to cross 90 miles of ocean, to escape to 'freedumb' in Cuba" said no one EVER.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Agreed that the squad are highlighted primarily for their leftist views and not their race, although the attacks on them are often racial ones. And that conscious racists are a small part of Trump’s base.

Disagreed that racism today is not systemic.
What RACE are Muslims & Puerto Ricans...…………..only one of the squad is BLACK...…….
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
It’s laughable because the conventional wisdom is the one bought and paid for by the moneyed enemies of democracy.
Who pays for your internet and PC or phone? If you can't afford your own home, how do you afford the above? Why would you support slave business abroad in order to have a PC or cell phone of employees paid dimes a day and many must sleep in slum conditions at employers to ensure they are on time for work...……...probably 16 hour+ work days...……...you support what you have whined of for years here...………..as long as you have your PC or Cell...…...you don't give a damn of their working conditions, you actually pay to ensure it continues, even with a Bush/Obama phone!
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
It's so damn great, they make rafts of garbage and risk their lives to cross 90 miles of shark infested sea.

"I hate America so bad, I'm going to the keys to launch a raft of garbage to cross 90 miles of ocean, to escape to 'freedumb' in Cuba" said no one EVER.
About 1 in 4 Cuban immigrants end up returning to Cuba. They come here for flat-screen TVs and cocaine, not democracy. If the U.S. gave automatic residency and job placement to people who came over on rafts from Ireland, Ireland would be depopulated in a month.
 

EatTheRich

President
Who pays for your internet and PC or phone? If you can't afford your own home, how do you afford the above? Why would you support slave business abroad in order to have a PC or cell phone of employees paid dimes a day and many must sleep in slum conditions at employers to ensure they are on time for work...……...probably 16 hour+ work days...……...you support what you have whined of for years here...………..as long as you have your PC or Cell...…...you don't give a damn of their working conditions, you actually pay to ensure it continues, even with a Bush/Obama phone!
1. I do.
2. I am actively advocating systemic change. You seem to be advocating that I undertake an ineffectual individual boycott which will not affect the system at all, while you are unwilling to do so yourself.
 

Sunset Rose

Mayor
Supporting Member
Race is an invention created around the 15th century to justify racial slavery and wars of racial conquest. It has no meaning outside the context of historical racism.
There is a woman named Jacqueline Battalora, who lectures on the invention of race. She is on YouTube. Please check her out when you have time. :)
 
Last edited:

Mick

The Right is always right
So there was a threat...by whom? The bill never came to the floor for a vote, so the fact is that you can say there was a threat all you like, but republicans had the majority, controlled the committees and never brought a bill to be voted on. 53 republicans only needed 7 democrats or independents to break a filibuster.
Fool, there are very few actual filibusters anymore. It's the THREAT of filibuster that prevents most bills from ever reaching the floor for vote. And there were not 53 Republicans in the Senate in 2003 when this bill was proposed by the Bush administration to Congress so why continue to lie? There were 51 Republicans, 48 Democrats, and one independent who caucused with the Dems so a 51-49 majority. It was the absolute slimmest of majorities. Any partisan bill that was threatened with filibuster never reached the floor. Why waster hundreds of hours on a bill that would die? Wake up, dummy.

These are the facts: The Bush administration proposed a bill in 2003 to Congress that would overhaul the GSE's and reduce their exposure to subprime loans and thus reduce the risk to the economy. Democrats screamed like stuck pigs about it claiming it was racist because it reduced available funding to their trash electorate. The bill would never pass filibuster in the Senate and thus it died.

Representatives Frank and Watt did not have the power to stop anything...they were not in the senate...and they had no power in the House, since they were in the minority.
So the fact Dems were screaming about how racist it was and vehemently opposed an act that's failure destroyed the economy while virtually every Republican supported it is not their fault? Their screaming like stuck pigs was an attempt to sway the electorate with emotion, not facts. And once again Republicans were proven to be right. Edited

Freddie and Fannie did not originate loans. Companies like CountryWide did.
We've already been over this. Edited Countrywide and other lenders on the primary market sold their subprime mortgages to Fannie and Freddie because Fannie and Freddie were eating them up due to lack of regulation. Had Countrywide had to keep the loans on their OWN books they would have never given them out. Edited

They reacted to the republican legislation like the Gramm-Leach-Bliley act that did away with any federal oversight over the derivatives market
Maybe you should go research the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. It played no role in the proliferation of bad loans given to the left wing electorate. Democrats passed it in the Senate 138-69 and Bill Clinton signed into law. Edited

Congress did not originate no doc loans...mortgage originators did.
Congress deregulated the GSEs and gave the GSEs implied government backing because of Democrat policies. This is encouraged the GSEs to engage in risky behavior. Primary lenders began to give out bad loans for easy money because the GSEs bought them off their books. This entire setup was caused by Democrat policies and any remedy proposed by President Bush or Republicans to stop this downward spiral was met with spite, hatred, and accusations of racism.

You can like, spit, and stammer all day. It wad Democrats who didn't want the GSEs regulated, it was Democrats who screamed racism at such efforts, it was Democrats who once again tried to make it an emotional issue instead of a factual one, and its Democrats who caused it. Period. President's Bush's efforts in September 2003 in the NY Times article I linked were impressive. Unfortunately the evil of your electorate and leaders took over common sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick

The Right is always right
He said there was racism in a lot of places, including police departments. He also said the shooter himself was a racist.

Are you claiming there is no evidence of racism in police departments?

He also said the Dallas police department was one that had made incredible strides in improving their relationship with minority communities and had helped plan the BLM marche
There is probably anti-black individual elements of racism in lots of places. If Obama wanted to scream about it and make it a bigger issue then it really was that was bad enough. When he brazenly brought it up in front of the friends, family, and coworkers at the funeral of peace officers brutally assassinated in cold blood by a white-hating left wing terrorist who had been inspired by Obama himself he was showing is utter evil, contempt, and despicability for those killed and peace officers in general.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Really? Where did Mueller say it didn't happen?
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/18/mueller-buzzfeed-news-report-1116046

8% of those in the republican party think Trump is a racist. You think that means there are none....good luck with that math.

Considering the factual statistics which of these statements are more ACCURATE?

People on the right think Trump is racist. (Your statement)

People on the right know Trump is not racist. (My statement)

Which would be more distortion of the beliefs and knowledge of those on the right?

Don't dance and make up excuses. Just answer the question.

:D
 

EatTheRich

President
There is probably anti-black individual elements of racism in lots of places. If Obama wanted to scream about it and make it a bigger issue then it really was that was bad enough. When he brazenly brought it up in front of the friends, family, and coworkers at the funeral of peace officers brutally assassinated in cold blood by a white-hating left wing terrorist who had been inspired by Obama himself he was showing is utter evil, contempt, and despicability for those killed and peace officers in general.
The terrorist was not inspired by Obama or by hatred for whites, he was inspired by the police’s war on Black people.
 

EatTheRich

President
Fool, there are very few actual filibusters anymore. It's the THREAT of filibuster that prevents most bills from ever reaching the floor for vote. And there were not 53 Republicans in the Senate in 2003 when this bill was proposed by the Bush administration to Congress so why continue to lie? There were 51 Republicans, 48 Democrats, and one independent who caucused with the Dems so a 51-49 majority. It was the absolute slimmest of majorities. Any partisan bill that was threatened with filibuster never reached the floor. Why waster hundreds of hours on a bill that would die? Wake up, dummy.

These are the facts: The Bush administration proposed a bill in 2003 to Congress that would overhaul the GSE's and reduce their exposure to subprime loans and thus reduce the risk to the economy. Democrats screamed like stuck pigs about it claiming it was racist because it reduced available funding to their trash electorate. The bill would never pass filibuster in the Senate and thus it died.



So the fact Dems were screaming about how racist it was and vehemently opposed an act that's failure destroyed the economy while virtually every Republican supported it is not their fault? Their screaming like stuck pigs was an attempt to sway the electorate with emotion, not facts. And once again Republicans were proven to be right. Edited


We've already been over this. Edited Countrywide and other lenders on the primary market sold their subprime mortgages to Fannie and Freddie because Fannie and Freddie were eating them up due to lack of regulation. Had Countrywide had to keep the loans on their OWN books they would have never given them out. Edited



Maybe you should go research the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. It played no role in the proliferation of bad loans given to the left wing electorate. Democrats passed it in the Senate 138-69 and Bill Clinton signed into law. Edited



Congress deregulated the GSEs and gave the GSEs implied government backing because of Democrat policies. This is encouraged the GSEs to engage in risky behavior. Primary lenders began to give out bad loans for easy money because the GSEs bought them off their books. This entire setup was caused by Democrat policies and any remedy proposed by President Bush or Republicans to stop this downward spiral was met with spite, hatred, and accusations of racism.

You can like, spit, and stammer all day. It wad Democrats who didn't want the GSEs regulated, it was Democrats who screamed racism at such efforts, it was Democrats who once again tried to make it an emotional issue instead of a factual one, and its Democrats who caused it. Period. President's Bush's efforts in September 2003 in the NY Times article I linked were impressive. Unfortunately the evil of your electorate and leaders took over common sense.
But it was banks like Lehman Brothers, not the GSEs, offloading almost all those toxic mortgages ... which they could do because of Gramm-Leavh-Billey.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
The terrorist was not inspired by Obama or by hatred for whites, he was inspired by the police’s war on Black people.
"The suspect said he was upset about Black Lives Matter; he said he was upset about the recent police shootings. The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers," Brown told reporters.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/7306/dallas-police-chief-suspect-wanted-kill-cops-amanda-prestigiacomo

Lie, lie, and lie again. It's all you do here. We've got these little things called facts. You should attempt to us them for once. You look like another left wing imbecile otherwise. Now where do you think his festering hatred for white people and white police officers came from? Oh yeah, that's right. Barry Hussein the Kenya kept the fear-mongering going among the low IQ part of the electorate by telling blacks they were being targeted. Evil, disgusting stuff all the way around.
 

EatTheRich

President
"The suspect said he was upset about Black Lives Matter; he said he was upset about the recent police shootings. The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers," Brown told reporters.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/7306/dallas-police-chief-suspect-wanted-kill-cops-amanda-prestigiacomo

Lie, lie, and lie again. It's all you do here. We've got these little things called facts. You should attempt to us them for once. You look like another left wing imbecile otherwise. Now where do you think his festering hatred for white people and white police officers came from? Oh yeah, that's right. Barry Hussein the Kenya kept the fear-mongering going among the low IQ part of the electorate by telling blacks they were being targeted. Evil, disgusting stuff all the way around.
Black people KNEW they were being targeted before Obama acknowledged the obvious. Not all the people *Johnson killed were white, but they were all cops.
 
Last edited:

Mick

The Right is always right
Black people KNEW they were being targeted before Obama acknowledged the obvious. Not all the people Boulware killed were white, but they were all cops.
The facts are more whites are shot by police officers than blacks. Obama ignored those facts to continue his hateful rhetoric. It was a lie perpetrated by the evil one in the WH at the time. A lie that riled many of his low IQ sheep up. Dozens of dead police officers as a result.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Black people KNEW they were being targeted before Obama acknowledged the obvious. Not all the people Boulware killed were white, but they were all cops.
All 5 cops murdered in Dallas were white.....by a left wing terrorist inspired by Obama due to lies regarding racism and targeting of blacks by police. Once again, we have facts here. You don't even know the guys name or victims yet you spew your lies? You aren't a much better person than this terrorist.
 

EatTheRich

President
The facts are more whites are shot by police officers than blacks. Obama ignored those facts to continue his hateful rhetoric. It was a lie perpetrated by the evil one in the WH at the time. A lie that riled many of his low IQ sheep up. Dozens of dead police officers as a result.
Proportional to population, Blacks are 2.5 times as likely to be shot by police. Moreover, Blacks shot by police are twice as likely as whites shot by police to be unarmed.

“Dozens,” now? Are you aware that during the Obama administration the rate of felonious killings of police fell to its lowest since the Truman administration, while the rate of police killings of civilians hit a new high?
 
Top