New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why Trump should not allow the FBI to re-extend Kavanaugh's SIXTH background check

Dino

Russian Asset
Because this was done already, when Democrats asked for it prior to Clarence Thomas's confirmation.

To make a few things clear, the FBI would NOT be doing a criminal investigation. That's not what this is for. It would add an extension (by 2 or 3 days) to Kavanaugh's latest (and sixth) background investigation. That's what happened with Clarence Thomas due to the (last minute) complaint as filed by Anita Hill.

And then, even though her claims were officially documented as "unfounded", Clarence Thomas is still branded as a serial sexual harrasser. No matter the complaint was unfounded, he is a conservative "Uncle Tom" and must therefore be castigated the rest of his life.

To hell with these phony 'pound me too' Democrats and 30+ year old claims with no evidence, police report, or witnesses to back any of it up. Their stall tactic is obvious and if this Ballsy Ford doesn't appear in front of the Senate committee, they should move for the vote on Kavanaugh's nomination. If the state of Maryland moves to arrest Kavanaugh some time in the future (they won't because the statute of limitation has run out) then he could be impeached and removed from the bench. But we all know it would never happen.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-allegations-timeline/index.html
 
Because this was done already, when Democrats asked for it prior to Clarence Thomas's confirmation.

To make a few things clear, the FBI would NOT be doing a criminal investigation. That's not what this is for. It would add an extension (by 2 or 3 days) to Kavanaugh's latest (and sixth) background investigation. That's what happened with Clarence Thomas due to the (last minute) complaint as filed by Anita Hill.

And then, even though her claims were officially documented as "unfounded", Clarence Thomas is still branded as a serial sexual harrasser. No matter the complaint was unfounded, he is a conservative "Uncle Tom" and must therefore be castigated the rest of his life.

To hell with these phony 'pound me too' Democrats and 30+ year old claims with no evidence, police report, or witnesses to back any of it up. Their stall tactic is obvious and if this Ballsy Ford doesn't appear in front of the Senate committee, they should move for the vote on Kavanaugh's nomination. If the state of Maryland moves to arrest Kavanaugh some time in the future (they won't because the statute of limitation has run out) then he could be impeached and removed from the bench. But we all know it would never happen.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-allegations-timeline/index.html
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/09/21/how_many_women_does_the_gop_want_to_lose_138130.html

"In the firestorm of allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Republicans have made clear that mitigating their woman problem has taken a back seat to voting him onto the Supreme Court as soon as possible.

"A Republican consultant summed it up this week, noting privately, 'I’d lose the House to get Justice Kavanaugh.'"

Do you agree?
 
S

Sickofleft

Guest
On it's face given how long ago this supposedly took place not one law enforcement agency in the country who would investigate this.
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/09/21/how_many_women_does_the_gop_want_to_lose_138130.html

"In the firestorm of allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Republicans have made clear that mitigating their woman problem has taken a back seat to voting him onto the Supreme Court as soon as possible.

"A Republican consultant summed it up this week, noting privately, 'I’d lose the House to get Justice Kavanaugh.'"

Do you agree?

Damnnnnnnnn……..

ONE loony li bby bi tch says that after 35 or 40 years she thinks that Kavanaugh felt her up at a teen party but she didn't and THAT to dems/libs, constitutes a, "firestorm of allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh"?

WOW...…...you lefties REALLY are overly "touchy-feely", huh?
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Because this was done already, when Democrats asked for it prior to Clarence Thomas's confirmation.

To make a few things clear, the FBI would NOT be doing a criminal investigation. That's not what this is for. It would add an extension (by 2 or 3 days) to Kavanaugh's latest (and sixth) background investigation. That's what happened with Clarence Thomas due to the (last minute) complaint as filed by Anita Hill.

And then, even though her claims were officially documented as "unfounded", Clarence Thomas is still branded as a serial sexual harrasser. No matter the complaint was unfounded, he is a conservative "Uncle Tom" and must therefore be castigated the rest of his life.

To hell with these phony 'pound me too' Democrats and 30+ year old claims with no evidence, police report, or witnesses to back any of it up. Their stall tactic is obvious and if this Ballsy Ford doesn't appear in front of the Senate committee, they should move for the vote on Kavanaugh's nomination. If the state of Maryland moves to arrest Kavanaugh some time in the future (they won't because the statute of limitation has run out) then he could be impeached and removed from the bench. But we all know it would never happen.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-allegations-timeline/index.html
Anita Hill’s account was “officially documented as unfounded”? In Wingerworld maybe, but not in the real world.

We almost certainly have a serial perjurer on the SCOTUS in Clarence Thomas. And now we may be getting another one.

Wingers lie with reckless abandon, even under oath.
 
On it's face given how long ago this supposedly took place not one law enforcement agency in the country who would investigate this.
The FBI would not be opening a criminal investigation into Kavanaugh's distant past; it would be reopening its latest background check into his character, which seems suspect, at least. Apparently, Trump would have to request a reopening which would add 2-3 days to an already rushed confirmation process.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
On it's face given how long ago this supposedly took place not one law enforcement agency in the country who would investigate this.
Nonsense. The FBI has routinely investigated everything that happened (or even allegedly happened) throughout a SCOTUS nominee’s entire life. But they have been told to steer clear of the Ford charge. We now live in a banana republic.
 
Damnnnnnnnn……..

ONE loony li bby bi tch says that after 35 or 40 years she thinks that Kavanaugh felt her up at a teen party but she didn't and THAT to dems/libs, constitutes a, "firestorm of allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh"?

WOW...…...you lefties REALLY are overly "touchy-feely", huh?
Of course you're forgetting the other four or five participants who were present at the teen party. Why not let the FBI interview all witnesses under oath before coming to a conclusion?

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html
 

Dino

Russian Asset
Anita Hill’s account was “officially documented as unfounded”? In Wingerworld maybe, but not in the real world.

We almost certainly have a serial perjurer on the SCOTUS in Clarence Thomas. And now we may be getting another one.

Wingers lie with reckless abandon, even under oath.
What's the excuse? I gave you a CNN link for crissakes....

September 26, 1991: Three days later, the FBI completed its investigation, and a report was submitted to the White House and the Judiciary Committee, according to Smith's statement. "The White House reviewed the report and determined that the allegation was unfounded," the statement said.


Now if you can find the FBI investigation coming up with ANYTHING credible against Clarence Thomas, now you just go on ahead and provide it...

But wait....there's more!

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2018/09/20/note-nets-fbi-investigation-anita-hill-claims-was-inconclusive

Amazingly, not one of the correspondents on the three networks managed to share the outcome of the FBI investigation into Hill’s allegations against Thomas. On October 7, 1991, The New York Times reported:

Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., the Delaware Democrat who heads the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement today that when Ms. Hill first contacted the committee, on Sept. 12, she insisted that her name not be used and that Judge Thomas not be told of her allegations. He said this effectively tied the committee's hands.

Only on Sept. 23, Pres. Biden said, did she agree to allow the Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate the allegations. The report was finished by Sept. 25, he said, and all committee members were notified of it by the next day. On Sept. 27, the committee deadlocked 7 to 7 on the nomination.

The White House today described the F.B.I. report as finding the allegations as “without foundation.” But Congressional officials who have seen the report said the bureau could not draw any conclusion because of the "he said, she said" nature of the subject.





Not only was the FBI inquiry inconclusive, but Hill was the one reluctant to even allow an investigation.

Summarizing Hill’s accusations against Thomas in a 2010 online article, CBS explained:

In 1991, Hill submitted a confidential statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that Thomas had sexually harassed her 10 years earlier, when they were both single. The FBI had already investigated the charges and given the committee what was called an inconclusive report. The committee decided not to pursue the matter. But two days before the full Senate was expected to confirm Thomas, Hill's statement was leaked to reporters.

The media seem to be arguing that the FBI can get to the bottom of the accusations against Kavanaugh. However, in the only other comparable situation that they point to, the Hill-Thomas hearing, the FBI was unsuccessful in getting to the bottom of anything. The very least reporters could do would be to provide that important context in their coverage.
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
Anita Hill’s account was “officially documented as unfounded”? In Wingerworld maybe, but not in the real world.

We almost certainly have a serial perjurer on the SCOTUS in Clarence Thomas. And now we may be getting another one.

Wingers lie with reckless abandon, even under oath.

I LOVE it...……..

"We almost certainly have a serial perjurer.."

I know that you as a dem/lib have NO concept of what the words you post actually MEAN, so please allow me to assist you. What the definitions of all of those words you just posted, when strung together in the manner that they are, tell us can be boiled down into a much more understandable message. And THAT would be;

"We don't have a serial perjurer."

Oh, you WANT to, you definitely "feel" we do, you even believe we do, BUT, the actual facts show us otherwise and those damned 'ol facts are still something that, after decades of trying, will not be displaced by sh it you on the left want to be.

But your persistence never ceases to amuse me so please, by all means, carry on.
 

Dino

Russian Asset
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/09/21/how_many_women_does_the_gop_want_to_lose_138130.html

"In the firestorm of allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Republicans have made clear that mitigating their woman problem has taken a back seat to voting him onto the Supreme Court as soon as possible.

"A Republican consultant summed it up this week, noting privately, 'I’d lose the House to get Justice Kavanaugh.'"

Do you agree?
No. If given the choice, I'd surely keep the House and get some different conservative on the Supreme Court.

I have no idea what specific issue this unnamed "Republican consultant" so trusts Kavanaugh on. There's nothing special about him.
 
The FBI would not be opening a criminal investigation into Kavanaugh's distant past; it would be reopening its latest background check into his character, which seems suspect, at least. Apparently, Trump would have to request a reopening which would add 2-3 days to an already rushed confirmation process.
Sure Georgey.

After SIX FBI background checks, one of which was literally just completed, maybe a seventh will turn up something they missed.

Right?

Do you have any idea what an FBI background check entails?

Here's a hint for you.........it DOES NOT ressemble anything close to an investigation.

The FBI has no jurisdiction to investigate anything asserted by Ford. Her allegation of groping is not a federal crime therefore it CANNOT be investigated by the FBI even if they desired. Which they clearly don't and have already issued a statement to that effect.

Just so you know even if the FBI found what they believed to be an impropriety on the part of Kavanaugh they would have to turn their findings over to the State of Maryland to further investigate.
 

justoffal

Senator
Nonsense. The FBI has routinely investigated everything that happened (or even allegedly happened) throughout a SCOTUS nominee’s entire life. But they have been told to steer clear of the Ford charge. We now live in a banana republic.
If we are are enterinh the tenth year.
Once again the reason you don't have any credibility.

Jo
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
Of course you're forgetting the other four or five participants who were present at the teen party. Why not let the FBI interview all witnesses under oath before coming to a conclusion?

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html

No matter how many people are interviewed or not we are still dealing with ONE allegation of groping at a teen party 35 or 40 years ago which simply dose NOT qualify as a "firestorm of allegationS", now does it?
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
Of course you're forgetting the other four or five participants who were present at the teen party. Why not let the FBI interview all witnesses under oath before coming to a conclusion?

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html

"Of course you're forgetting the other four or five participants who were present at the teen party. "

That's right, I did forget that...……….

Tell you what, give me 35 or 40 years and maybe I'll all of a sudden remember, 'K?

(Hey, stranger things have happened...)
 
No. If given the choice, I'd surely keep the House and get some different conservative on the Supreme Court.

I have no idea what specific issue this unnamed "Republican consultant" so trusts Kavanaugh on. There's nothing special about him.
According to one commentator I heard on this subject, there's a conservative woman Trump could pick who's further to the right than Kavanaugh.
 
S

Sickofleft

Guest
Nonsense. The FBI has routinely investigated everything that happened (or even allegedly happened) throughout a SCOTUS nominee’s entire life. But they have been told to steer clear of the Ford charge. We now live in a banana republic.
No dipshit it's actually a fact. This "case" does not even meet the standard of evidence that would allow a civil trial to go forward let alone a criminal investigation.

Somehow you guys have come to believe that you can accuse someone of attempted rape and assault and NOT have to actually prove the allegations.

You [Unwelcome language removed] get away with this and yes, we do live in a Banana Republic......thanks to you and your fascist friends.

Oh and just as a matter of course please go [Unwelcome language removed] yourself you lying sack of shit. Thank you.
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
According to one commentator I heard on this subject, there's a conservative woman Trump could pick who's further to the right than Kavanaugh.
She better hope like hell he never does.

That would be a sure-fired way of having someone all of a sudden "remember" that back when she was 12 years old and babysitting she touched the pee-pee of the baby while "claiming" she was cleaning him up after he shit his diaper and demand she go to jail or at least be deemed t be a serial child molester.

Guaran-fukin'-teed.

dems/libs have learned that sh it works and guilt can and WILL now be assigned, (to cons anyway), based on nothing more than one allegation, accusation, even insinuation.


She best turn him down if that ever does come to pass. And that is the plan of the left too.
 
Top