Bugsy McGurk
President
I'm betting they don't have one, much less nine.
Cementing their status as worthless, partisan hacks.
Cementing their status as worthless, partisan hacks.
You do understand the difference between a Special Forces operation and a diplomatic outpost?I'm betting they don't have one, much less nine.
Cementing their status as worthless, partisan hacks.
His betters do not go into such details when feeding him his talking points for the day.You do understand the difference between a Special Forces operation and a diplomatic outpost?
I'm guessing you oppose any congressional investigations, much less 9 of them?You do understand the difference between a Special Forces operation and a diplomatic outpost?
Your take is that the 9 Benghazi investigations were undertaken just to explore the role of "the video"?I guess that would depend on whether or not the Trump Administration blames their deaths on something completely unrelated in order to cover up for a failed policy in an election year.
Soooooo I am guessing no.
Do you think it's as big a difference as the difference in integrity between Democrat & Republican parties?"You do understand the difference between a Special Forces operation and a diplomatic outpost?" Cb #2
They were undertaken because the Administration purposely lied about the attack, it was never based on a "video" and they knew that from day one.Your take is that the 9 Benghazi investigations were undertaken just to explore the role of "the video"?
Are we to investigate every military operation in which soldiers die?I'm guessing you oppose any congressional investigations, much less 9 of them?
;-)
Was that a "yes"?They were undertaken because the Administration purposely lied about the attack, it was never based on a "video" and they knew that from day one.
Neither party has much integrity, if any at all. But to equate a terrorist assault on a US diplomat to instigated combat is ludicrous.Do you think it's as big a difference as the difference in integrity between Democrat & Republican parties?
First, your dodge is duly noted.Are we to investigate every military operation in which soldiers die?
Recall also that there were over a dozen terrorist attacks on US embassies and compounds during the GWB era.Neither party has much integrity, if any at all. But to equate a terrorist assault on a US diplomat to instigated combat is ludicrous.
There was no dodge. Equating the attack on Benghazi with an active military operation is retarded. I'm embarrassed for you.First, your dodge is duly noted.
Second, most Americans didn't even know we had soldiers in Niger. Why were they there? What happened? Did they have the protection they deserved? What was Trump doing as the attack occurred and after the fact?
You know - the same kind of questions the GOP asked ad nauseum about Benghazi. Should the GOP not have one investigation to answer those questions, having held 9 Benghazi investigations?
The Niger operation wasn't a terrorist attack. It was a military operation. Really, can you be this retarded?Recall also that there were over a dozen terrorist attacks on US embassies and compounds during the GWB era.
The number investigated by the GOP when GWB was president? Zero.
The number of investigations of Benghazi? Nine.
And another dodge. While denying the first dodge.There was no dodge. Equating the attack on Benghazi with an active military operation is retarded. I'm embarrassed for you.
Absurd. We are told that terrorists killed our soldiers.The Niger operation wasn't a terrorist attack. It was a military operation. Really, can you be this retarded?
This from a man who doesn't know the difference between 3 billion and 10 billion...There was no dodge. Equating the attack on Benghazi with an active military operation is retarded. I'm embarrassed for you.
There are no dodges. Just simple answers to stupid questions. Keep plugging, Bugsy!And another dodge. While denying the first dodge.
Deplorable.
;-)