Days
Commentator
Can you see an atom? Or is it too small? How about a particle, even the largest particle (proton or neutron) - isn't that much smaller than an atom? Can you see a proton stream passing through your head? What would that look like, if it was visible? A stream of light?
I ask because the astronauts saw tiny flares of "radiation" in Low Earth Orbit. We are told radiation is a particle stream... you know, protons and neutrons... how could a human see anything that tiny? What is the highest magnification of an electron microscope? Would you believe 2 million x?
Whatever the astronauts were seeing streaking across their skulls with their eyes shut... a human can not see an atomic particle, which, by the way, is another 1000 times smaller than an atom. Electron microscopes have taken pictures of atoms, after that it is a detection process, we can't see anything as small as a proton or neutron with an electron microscope. The human eye can not see the flaws in a diamond that show up on a 1000 x loop. Heck, we can not see the flaws that show up on a 50 x loop. Okay? Nobody has ever seen high energy particles in space, not with an electron microscope and certainly not with their eyes closed streaking across their retinas.
Such is the nonsense we swallow.
What is light?
Light is a wave, is it also a particle? Anyone ever see a particle of light? You do realize that a photon is just a measurement of light, the same way an inch is a measurement of distance? Is a measurement a particle? (No) A measurement is not composed of anything, in and of itself, it is just a scale for measuring. How many particles in a "degree"? None, people, it is a measurement of heat, it is like asking how many particles in a number? Numbers are measurements, they don't exist except in our minds, they have no matter. A photon is not a particle of light, it is a measurement of light... useful for mathematics. Okay? There's no protons, neutrons, or electrons in a photon. Light is a wave of energy, it is not, nor does it contain particles. Particle physics is simply a method for measuring... when particle physics measures light, it pretends light is a particle - for the purpose of measuring - but light is not a particle, there is no protons, neutrons, electrons, atoms, elements, molecules composing light. The stars have elements, but the light they emit does not. There is no light from stars that carries elements, there is nothing in light, no particles, no hydrogen, helium, or carbon or lead, nada, light is not a particle nor does it carry particles, it is a reversing magnetic field that moves through a vacuum; by the way, vacuums - by definition - have no particles, no matter, nothing, a vacuum is the absence of particles. So whatever science is detecting when they detect quarks from distance stars, which, by the way, quarks are again another 1000 times smaller than electrons which are a 1000 times smaller than protons which are another 1000 times smaller than the smallest thing we can see with an electron microscope... an atom... guess why it is called "theoretical physics"? But vacuums are not theoretical. And space is a vacuum. Science used to believe space is an aether... that it contained something to transmit light, conduct the electricity... but today we believe space is a vacuum. Uhm, you know, no particles. At least we say we believe that, then we start saying light is a particle and a wave, which is really just our teachers trying to explain the old math from the days of aether... ouch.
Is there any particles that are necessary or in some way compose a magnetic field? (No) What is magnetism and gravity? You have to answer that they are "forces". Here's the scary part. A force doesn't exist, it doesn't contain matter, it is really just another measurement. We have no way to define any difference between gravity and magnetism, they both are definitions, descriptions, measurements, of the force between matter. That can be between large clumps of matter, such as a black hole, or be between tiny particles of matter such as protons or neutrons, after that, those theoretical particles smaller than protons, have no gravity, no atomic weight, they are too small to measure, and we don't even know that they exist other than we are detecting something, but we don't really know what it is we are detecting, we have no idea if an electron is a particle or not. Is electricity a flow of electrons? Sure it is, and we measure that flow with "amperage". Amperage, like degrees and photons, is a measurement, and like a vacuum, it doesn't exist, it has no matter, it is theoretical, like a number. No particles in a measurement, people.
A reversing magnetic field moves through a vacuum by means of "induction". Again, no particles. When a Coronal Mass Ejection explodes on the surface of the sun, it loops out into space and... and... and... falls right back into the sun. Nothing escapes into space, nothing of any atomic weight, if it has weight, if it is anything as big as a proton so that it has mass, then how in the hell is it escaping the gravity of the sun? (It isn't)
I ask because the astronauts saw tiny flares of "radiation" in Low Earth Orbit. We are told radiation is a particle stream... you know, protons and neutrons... how could a human see anything that tiny? What is the highest magnification of an electron microscope? Would you believe 2 million x?
Whatever the astronauts were seeing streaking across their skulls with their eyes shut... a human can not see an atomic particle, which, by the way, is another 1000 times smaller than an atom. Electron microscopes have taken pictures of atoms, after that it is a detection process, we can't see anything as small as a proton or neutron with an electron microscope. The human eye can not see the flaws in a diamond that show up on a 1000 x loop. Heck, we can not see the flaws that show up on a 50 x loop. Okay? Nobody has ever seen high energy particles in space, not with an electron microscope and certainly not with their eyes closed streaking across their retinas.
Such is the nonsense we swallow.
What is light?
Light is a wave, is it also a particle? Anyone ever see a particle of light? You do realize that a photon is just a measurement of light, the same way an inch is a measurement of distance? Is a measurement a particle? (No) A measurement is not composed of anything, in and of itself, it is just a scale for measuring. How many particles in a "degree"? None, people, it is a measurement of heat, it is like asking how many particles in a number? Numbers are measurements, they don't exist except in our minds, they have no matter. A photon is not a particle of light, it is a measurement of light... useful for mathematics. Okay? There's no protons, neutrons, or electrons in a photon. Light is a wave of energy, it is not, nor does it contain particles. Particle physics is simply a method for measuring... when particle physics measures light, it pretends light is a particle - for the purpose of measuring - but light is not a particle, there is no protons, neutrons, electrons, atoms, elements, molecules composing light. The stars have elements, but the light they emit does not. There is no light from stars that carries elements, there is nothing in light, no particles, no hydrogen, helium, or carbon or lead, nada, light is not a particle nor does it carry particles, it is a reversing magnetic field that moves through a vacuum; by the way, vacuums - by definition - have no particles, no matter, nothing, a vacuum is the absence of particles. So whatever science is detecting when they detect quarks from distance stars, which, by the way, quarks are again another 1000 times smaller than electrons which are a 1000 times smaller than protons which are another 1000 times smaller than the smallest thing we can see with an electron microscope... an atom... guess why it is called "theoretical physics"? But vacuums are not theoretical. And space is a vacuum. Science used to believe space is an aether... that it contained something to transmit light, conduct the electricity... but today we believe space is a vacuum. Uhm, you know, no particles. At least we say we believe that, then we start saying light is a particle and a wave, which is really just our teachers trying to explain the old math from the days of aether... ouch.
Is there any particles that are necessary or in some way compose a magnetic field? (No) What is magnetism and gravity? You have to answer that they are "forces". Here's the scary part. A force doesn't exist, it doesn't contain matter, it is really just another measurement. We have no way to define any difference between gravity and magnetism, they both are definitions, descriptions, measurements, of the force between matter. That can be between large clumps of matter, such as a black hole, or be between tiny particles of matter such as protons or neutrons, after that, those theoretical particles smaller than protons, have no gravity, no atomic weight, they are too small to measure, and we don't even know that they exist other than we are detecting something, but we don't really know what it is we are detecting, we have no idea if an electron is a particle or not. Is electricity a flow of electrons? Sure it is, and we measure that flow with "amperage". Amperage, like degrees and photons, is a measurement, and like a vacuum, it doesn't exist, it has no matter, it is theoretical, like a number. No particles in a measurement, people.
A reversing magnetic field moves through a vacuum by means of "induction". Again, no particles. When a Coronal Mass Ejection explodes on the surface of the sun, it loops out into space and... and... and... falls right back into the sun. Nothing escapes into space, nothing of any atomic weight, if it has weight, if it is anything as big as a proton so that it has mass, then how in the hell is it escaping the gravity of the sun? (It isn't)
Last edited: