Sorry son you cannot equate America's rights with illegal immigrants. Sorry, they are not entitled to them.
Early in America's history people came from every corner of the world. And today,
you still don't understand. While everyone had
unalienable Rights, only whites were citizens. Those of you adamant about the issue wear blinders and cannot see - AND you're a hypocrite about it. Allow me a moment to prove it:
According to the Declaration of Independence, all men have
unalienable Rights. As such, those Rights are above the law. Let's take a look at how the early courts viewed
unalienable Rights:
"
The right of a citizen to bear arms, in the lawful defense of himself, or the state is absolute. He does not derive it from the state government... It is one of the "high powers" ... and is excepted out of the general powers of government. ...A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the law making power." Cockrum v. State 24 texas 394, 402 (1859.)
The Right to keep and bear Arms is predicated upon the
unalienable Right to Life; therefore, most gun laws have no legal standing IF we assert that they are
unalienable Rights. Equally true then, that
Liberty is above the law. so, NO SIR, I'm nobody's liberal. I'm simply guided by a simple principle:
The government did not create me and, as a result, has no jurisdiction over
unalienable Rights. That is a world away from the benefits of citizenship - which are privileges. Now, the thinking of the anti - immigrant lobby is that every statute Congress passes is enforceable IF the anti-immigrant agrees with it. And if you don't agree, you are a liberal. What a freaking joke!
The downside to their argument is that
unalienable Rights either come from a Creator (as per the Declaration of Independence) OR they are granted by government. The problem is, if the foreigner has no
unalienable Rights, then
neither does the individual gun owner. Well, I suppose you could argue that some God came down and said that only legal Americans are entitled to their Life, Liberty and the right to pursue Happiness.
My critics have never shot one of these so - called "
illegal aliens" because they realize that those people have a Right to Life. Well, they also have a Right to Liberty and a Right to the pursuit of Happiness. When Constitutional Sheepdog can tell you about all the so-called "
illegal aliens" he's shot down, he can come here, crow and tell you how wrong I am. It's illegal to shoot those people because the same laws that protect YOUR Life, Liberty and pursuit of Happiness are the same ones protecting them. If not, Constitutional Sheepdog will be happy to describe in detail his exploits on the border and his kill count.
Does that make me a "
liberal?" Well, I've spent a few
decades trying to drum up support for passing laws that make welfare, Socialist Security, etc. benefits of citizenship instead of a right (as the current courts claim.) Where was Constitutional Sheepdog on that issue? While the anti-immigrant lobby has tried to force people into becoming citizens, I've fought it tooth and nail, not willing to add millions more to our welfare dole - and they call me the liberal!!!
While I've fought the illegal income tax and exposed the illegally ratified 14th Amendment, the anti -immigrant lobby has lobbied for an absolute POLICE STATE... and they call me a liberal. The anti-immigrant lobby backed warrantless searches, National ID, the so - called "Patriot Act" and Constitution Free Zones - ALL of which I have fought (including in the courts) and these mis-educated sheeple can only invoke an emotion laden term that does not fit me in any way, shape, fashion or form. Liberal? Aren't you the guys arguing against
unalienable Rights both in words AND actions?