Okay, first of all, what is "plasma"? I guess it is listed as a 4th state of matter (solid, liquid, gas, and "super heated gas")... but me thinks it still amounts to being a gas, right? If we are talking about filling the vast expanse of space, is it possible that the whole universe has been filled with super heated gas? We see these giant gas clouds in telescopic images - and damn, people, try to realize how large those gas clouds are; you could fit a galaxy into some of those - are the gas clouds going to have firm borders? in space? if there's nothing there to stop the super heated gas from expanding, wouldn't it just keep on expanding and expanding and expanding? IOW, as the stars are expanding into space, so is the plasma they produce.
The guy in the video is a great story teller, but let's not let him write off the whole of modern physics; magnetism and the electrical universe is not fringe science, the hardest class my son took at UIC was magnetism; it is a course of physics all its own. All stars and planets have a magnetosphere, and the gravity disc that contains the stars of a black hole, or the planets of a star, or the rings of a planet; the gravity is part of the magnetosphere.
Okay, but what I want to discuss is the plasma aether that absolutely must be filling all of space. Does it contain particles? Nope. Can starlight pass through it? Absolutely. In fact, I would say starlight has two natures; an electromagnetic wave and a plasma aether. Both are electrical. It truly is an electrical universe.
Magnetism and gravity are both forces. However we perceive the construction of an atom, the building block of matter is itself 99.9999% a construct of gravitational and electrical forces. And really, just because we can see a proton, do we really know it is a particle? (a solid) ... after all, we have looked upon atoms and they present a skin, they appear as particles, but we know they are anything but particles.
Man keeps looking for his beginnings, so he dreams up a big bang, because that offers a beginning, so we can cling to anything that looks like solid ground to stand upon, something we can grasp, something that fits into our physical and religious paradigm, our universal need to know that, we exist, that we have substance, and in that, we hope to continue and not just vanish the same way we appeared from nowhere and quite literally, from nothing. But the closer we look, and the more we learn, we are finding out that everything consists of forces; that all the states of matter appear from the combination of forces; the elements are nothing more than different combinations of the same forces. If you want to hold onto the idea that those contain particles; fine, but if you look closer at the particles, they are just more combinations of forces; all the states of matter are the result of different combinations of forces, and forces can carry different names, which generally are describing what they are doing and how they act; but those too keep changing on us, so we come up with more names for all these different ways forces are acting, as we discover how complicated the universe really is.
If the vastness of space is filled with a plasma aether; does that constitute a consciousness? Could this be the God with no beginning or no end? If it is, then I guess there was no big bang, eh? Like I said in another thread; the creation myth is simply starting another civilization; Genesis takes you back to the beginning of another epoch, this time man is formed from the ground, okay, here we go again, aren't those particles of dust formed by particles of matter? Or not?