….and were ordered to pay her legal fees.
Maddow talked about OAN's Russia connection on her show. OAN didn't like that one bit.
Maddow talked about OAN's Russia connection on her show. OAN didn't like that one bit.
A good day for US patriots - winger liars get slapped down.….and were ordered to pay her legal fees.
Maddow talked about OAN's Russia connection on her show. OAN didn't like that one bit.
Is InfoWars still in business? That is the lawsuit I can't wait to see pay off for the parents he has accused.A good day for US patriots - winger liars get slapped down.
This is the kind of crap OAN does:A good day for US patriots - winger liars get slapped down.
This might help.Is InfoWars still in business? That is the lawsuit I can't wait to see pay off for the parents he has accused.
The only president Trump will pardon is himself.This is the kind of crap OAN does:
OANN 'Reporter' Bizarrely Asks Press Secretary If Trump Will Pardon President Obama
Fake reporter, Chanel Rion, asked if Trump would pardon President Obama for...
OANN 'Reporter' Bizarrely Asks Press Secretary If Trump Will Pardon President Obama
Fake reporter, Chanel Rion, asked if the Donald Trump would pardon President Obama for...I have no idea? Crimes?crooksandliars.com
That's right. Maddow and The Daily Beast mentioning that OAN had a Kremlin journalist on their staff.....isn't defamatory.LOL! Did you even bother to read it?
d. Summary By protecting speakers whose statements cannot reasonably be interpreted as allegations of fact, courts “provide[ ] assurance that public debate will not suffer for lack of ‘imaginative expression’ or the ‘rhetorical hyperbole’ which has traditionally added much to the discourse of our Nation.” Milkovich, 497 U.S. at 20 (quoting Hustler Mag., Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46, 53–55 (1988)). That is the case here. Considering the totality of the circumstances—including the general context of the statements, the specific context of the statements, and the statements’ susceptibility of being proven true or false—a reasonable factfinder could only conclude that the statement was one of opinion not fact.
Because it's NOT A FACT! LOL!That's right. Maddow and The Daily Beast mentioning that OAN had a Kremlin journalist on their staff.....isn't defamatory.
Oh, it be true.Because it's NOT A FACT! LOL!
Not according to the court record you linked to.Oh, it be true.
Pro-Trump Channel Deploys a Former Kremlin Propagandist to Blast the 'Russia Hoax'
The Trumpist cable channel enlisted an alum of the Putin propaganda machine to undercut a report about Russian propaganda.www.thedailybeast.com