New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Iranian Islamic theocracy sides with Democrats in attack on President Trump

Why was it a better idea to kill him, on Iraqi soil, without telling the Iraqis, in an area surrounded by thousands of US troops...to kill him rather than taking him into custody for a trial?
So you're on the side of the Iranian Islamic theocracy that executes homosexuals, mutilates the genitals of young girls, and burns Jews alive. What a shocker...

Let's look back at your opinion of Obama's killing of Awlaki.
1. Awlaki was in an area of the world without a working Law Enforcement capability. Their courts had already condemned him to death in absentia but couldn't capture him.
2. He was surrounded by his own armed fighters with no American troops or allied troops able to mount a mission without substantial casualties.
3. Significant evidence existed of Awlaki's part in attempts to bring down two US airliners with hundreds of passengers.

And you think killing him was a crime by Obama....
Awlaki was an American citizen when Obama lynched him. Soleimani, since it appears you don't know this, was not.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
So you're on the side of the Iranian Islamic theocracy that executes homosexuals, mutilates the genitals of young girls, and burns Jews alive. What a shocker...



Awlaki was an American citizen when Obama lynched him. Soleimani, since it appears you don't know this, was not.
you argued we should let awlaki go free or get US troops killed..I say capture for Soleimani would have been easy and a better tactic.

How is capture, trial and execution on the side of Iran?
 
you argued we should let awlaki go free or get US troops killed..I say capture for Soleimani would have been easy and a better tactic.

How is capture, trial and execution on the side of Iran?
I never argued that, quit your pathetic lying. I argued Awlaki should have been given due process (arrest, trial, and execution if found guilty). You and Obama thought it was easier just to assassinate him.

Now that your fellow Antifa folks have been declared terrorists, you're on board if President Trump decides to start droning them, right?
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
I never argued that, quit your pathetic lying. I argued Awlaki should have been given due process (arrest, trial, and execution if found guilty). You and Obama thought it was easier just to assassinate him.

Now that your fellow Antifa folks have been declared terrorists, you're on board if President Trump decides to start droning them, right?
One shudders to consider your high pitch shrieking if Obama refused to just kill that AQ terrorist, sent in US soldiers, and got them killed. Your shrieking would have pierced countless eardrums.

;-)
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
How is Obama paying off Iran working out? Not good.
They'd stopped enriching uranium...Trump bailed out of that agreement. What happens now is on him. I'd expect them to be testing a weapon in another 3 or 4 years, unless President Biden can get them to come back to the table.

How in hell is no deal better than the one we had?

As far as returning their money to them...we were bound by a treaty signed by Reagan to comply with the findings of a tribunal. The judgement of the tribunal would have cost more.

Hey...did you know Reagan returned $454 million to Iran?

.
 

EatTheRich

President
Let's look back at where you fell on the Soleimani killing. It was right in line with the Iranian Islamic theocracy. The same theocracy that executes homosexuals, encourages female genital mutilation, and burns Jews alive. Of course.
Link to evidence of your claim that Iran’s government “encourages female genital mutilation” or “burns Jews alive.”
 
Top