Here is what you said Charlie Chester's job description at CNN is from #27:
Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators
Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories
Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality
possible
Here is what Benjamin Gelb's job description was at NY1:
Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators
Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories
Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality
possible
Notice not only the words are an exact one to one match but the
indents as well! Oh but it's all just a coincidence right? Even the indents, right? No proof there, right? Sure.
And you say you got this from his LinkedIn page before he deleted it.
No you didn't. Liar!
Then you actually got the deleted page from Project Veritas:
View attachment 62773
Notice how this is NOT the job description you pasted above! i.e. you lied again! But you can't even get that right because you left off something. What did you leave off?
So you lied about his TRUE LinkedIn page by ommitting a crucial element! It's like you avoid the truth like a vampire avoids the cross!
So to summarize:
You posted "Charlie Chester's" job description. Proven lie.
You said you captured it before he deleted it. Proven lie.
You posted his page captured by Project Veritas. Admitting the earlier post was a lie.
You cherry picked his page leaving off his real or imagined claim that he played an integral part in the 2020 election. Cherry picking lie.
Those are just the highlights. Far more lies in the coverups.
In short. . .
This is really getting boring.