New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Who still thinks CNN is a legitimate news outlet?

Spamature

President
So it’s amazing you don’t know this but, “public access” does not equal “CNN.”

You’re welcome. Even in my own field I know “systems engineer” for Green City Waste Management does not equal “systems engineer” for Space X. But keep grasping.
The job is the job. His opinion is his opinion.

Also was this guy saying this stuff because he wanted bed O'Keefe operative ?

Because guys tend to tell a woman what she wants to hear in that kind of situation.
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
No, you guys are lying, shamelessly, about what happened in this thread. All while sanctimoniously trumpeting your superior honesty.
He lied alright - and tried to pass it off as something it wasn’t...because that’s how illiberal leftists roll. It is unsurprising as well that - as fellow communist - you promptly render the servicing. Bad faith, poor character...and I’ll just not speculate about other habits.
 

EatTheRich

President
He lied alright - and tried to pass it off as something it wasn’t...because that’s how illiberal leftists roll. It is unsurprising as well that - as fellow communist - you promptly render the servicing. Bad faith, poor character...and I’ll just not speculate about other habits.
Falsely calling people communists and pretending they lied when to all indications they told the truth, on the other hand, I'm sure, represents good faith and strength of character.
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
Falsely calling people communists and pretending they lied when to all indications they told the truth, on the other hand, I'm sure, represents good faith and strength of character.
He lied, you support his lies, and you are most certainly a pinko’s pinko. ~ Golf clap from Democrats who pretend to not be commies ~
Have a nice night.
 

EatTheRich

President
He lied, you support his lies, and you are most certainly a pinko’s pinko. ~ Golf clap from Democrats who pretend to not be commies ~
Have a nice night.
What was the lie? That he quoted the job description? You have provided not even a credible argument that it is untrue, and it is exactly the sort of job description we would expect such a person to have. If you had any honor, you would demonstrate that it was a lie or man up and apologize.
 

Schrodinger's Platypus

Radical Constitutional Extremist
What was the lie? That he quoted the job description? You have provided not even a credible argument that it is untrue, and it is exactly the sort of job description we would expect such a person to have. If you had any honor, you would demonstrate that it was a lie or man up and apologize.
I’m not going to repeat and rehash for the sake of a bad faith debater like yourself. The posts are all there: 27, 49, 53, 58 and all the rest.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
State the lie “you guys” did.

middleview lied his ass off in 27 and I proved he lied in 49. The only lie is from him. Lying middleview.
It is a lie that you proved anything. The only way your could possibly prove it is to find the original Likedin profile that I proved he'd deleted after I copied that part of it.

The proof I didn't lie is that I even provided a matching job description, which you cannot dispute. So the fact is that Veritas claims this guy is a source to prove CNN purposefully set out to defeat Trump. In fact the guy is an equipment operator and has nothing at all to do with setting the topics or editorial content.
 

Schrodinger's Platypus

Radical Constitutional Extremist
It is a lie that you proved anything. The only way your could possibly prove it is to find the original Likedin profile that I proved he'd deleted after I copied that part of it.

The proof I didn't lie is that I even provided a matching job description, which you cannot dispute. So the fact is that Veritas claims this guy is a source to prove CNN purposefully set out to defeat Trump. In fact the guy is an equipment operator and has nothing at all to do with setting the topics or editorial content.
That’s a lie. They didn’t match.

You “provided a matching job description,” from Benjamin Gelb and tried to pass it off as Charlie Chester’s. So in other words you lied.

And this is not just a one off. It’s a lie covered up with a lie compounded by more lies. You even say so in your cover ups.

Nothing you write can be trusted.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
That’s a lie. They didn’t match.

You “provided a matching job description,” from Benjamin Gelb and tried to pass it off as Charlie Chester’s. So in other words you lied.

And this is not just a one off. It’s a lie covered up with a lie compounded by more lies. You even say so in your cover ups.

Nothing you write can be trusted.
So his experience from his Facebook page matches his deleted Linkedin profile...
He operates a Sony switcher, manages playback, helps with filming interviews...

FACEBOOK

1619977911247.png

LINKEDIN:
Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators

Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories

Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality possible

Where is the discrepancy between those two descriptions that would indicate the Facebook profile invalidates the Linkedin profile? While you're at it...where is the indication that the Veritas sting actually shows he was responsible for stories or editorial content?

Can you show that that is not simple boilerplate for the job? Nah. Try to stay focused on the topic...if you can.
 

Schrodinger's Platypus

Radical Constitutional Extremist
So his experience from his Facebook page matches his deleted Linkedin profile...
He operates a Sony switcher, manages playback, helps with filming interviews...

FACEBOOK

View attachment 62812

LINKEDIN:
Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators

Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories

Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality possible

Where is the discrepancy between those two descriptions that would indicate the Facebook profile invalidates the Linkedin profile? While you're at it...where is the indication that the Veritas sting actually shows he was responsible for stories or editorial content?

Can you show that that is not simple boilerplate for the job? Nah. Try to stay focused on the topic...if you can.
Here is what you said Charlie Chester's job description at CNN is from #27:

Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators
Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories
Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality
possible
Here is what Benjamin Gelb's job description was at NY1:

Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators
Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories
Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality
possible

Notice not only the words are an exact one to one match but the indents as well! Oh but it's all just a coincidence right? Even the indents, right? No proof there, right? Sure.

And you say you got this from his LinkedIn page before he deleted it.

Nope...I got it from a linkedin profile that he deleted.


I copied the job description from his linkedin page before he deleted it.
No you didn't. Liar!
Then you actually got the deleted page from Project Veritas:

View attachment 62773
Notice how this is NOT the job description you pasted above! i.e. you lied again! But you can't even get that right because you left off something. What did you leave off?


So you lied about his TRUE LinkedIn page by ommitting a crucial element! It's like you avoid the truth like a vampire avoids the cross!

So to summarize:
You posted "Charlie Chester's" job description. Proven lie.
You said you captured it before he deleted it. Proven lie.
You posted his page captured by Project Veritas. Admitting the earlier post was a lie.
You cherry picked his page leaving off his real or imagined claim that he played an integral part in the 2020 election. Cherry picking lie.
Those are just the highlights. Far more lies in the coverups.

In short. . .

This is really getting boring.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Here is what you said Charlie Chester's job description at CNN is from #27:

Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators
Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories
Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality
possible
Here is what Benjamin Gelb's job description was at NY1:

Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators
Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories
Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality
possible

Notice not only the words are an exact one to one match but the indents as well! Oh but it's all just a coincidence right? Even the indents, right? No proof there, right? Sure.

And you say you got this from his LinkedIn page before he deleted it.


No you didn't. Liar!
Then you actually got the deleted page from Project Veritas:

View attachment 62773
Notice how this is NOT the job description you pasted above! i.e. you lied again! But you can't even get that right because you left off something. What did you leave off?


So you lied about his TRUE LinkedIn page by ommitting a crucial element! It's like you avoid the truth like a vampire avoids the cross!

So to summarize:
You posted "Charlie Chester's" job description. Proven lie.
You said you captured it before he deleted it. Proven lie.
You posted his page captured by Project Veritas. Admitting the earlier post was a lie.
You cherry picked his page leaving off his real or imagined claim that he played an integral part in the 2020 election. Cherry picking lie.
Those are just the highlights. Far more lies in the coverups.

In short. . .

This is really getting boring.
Key part of the argument here...."his real or imagined claim" had nothing to do with his f*cking job description...which was the whole f*cking point.

Wow...you cannot stay focused on the damned topic...which is veritas...

They attempted to say that he was one of the people making policy for the station and that proved CNN was acting as a propaganda outlet to defeat Trump.

I gave you his linkedin profile AND his facebook profile.

You want to spend your time whining about the fact that his job description matches someone else's...that is not my problem. He deleted his linkedin profile...

Then you want to argue about him claiming to had an INTERGRAL part in the 2020 election.

Now...all you need to do to prove your point that I lied is to find a copy of his deleted linkedin profile AND then prove that he had anything at all to say about CNN's news broadcasts. As his Facebook profile shows, he operating video equipment for several of the CNN TV shows. Did he have anything at all to do with controlling content? If not you and Veritas lose.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
Here is what you said Charlie Chester's job description at CNN is from #27:

Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators
Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories
Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality
possible
Here is what Benjamin Gelb's job description was at NY1:

Direct newscast tapings in the control room, including communicating with talent, producers, or audio operators
Operate Sony switcher, cueing video, graphics, and other elements for playback during stories
Maintain quality control for all control room elements, cameras, and audio to ensure taping is at the highest quality
possible

Notice not only the words are an exact one to one match but the indents as well! Oh but it's all just a coincidence right? Even the indents, right? No proof there, right? Sure.

And you say you got this from his LinkedIn page before he deleted it.


No you didn't. Liar!
Then you actually got the deleted page from Project Veritas:

View attachment 62773
Notice how this is NOT the job description you pasted above! i.e. you lied again! But you can't even get that right because you left off something. What did you leave off?


So you lied about his TRUE LinkedIn page by ommitting a crucial element! It's like you avoid the truth like a vampire avoids the cross!

So to summarize:
You posted "Charlie Chester's" job description. Proven lie.
You said you captured it before he deleted it. Proven lie.
You posted his page captured by Project Veritas. Admitting the earlier post was a lie.
You cherry picked his page leaving off his real or imagined claim that he played an integral part in the 2020 election. Cherry picking lie.
Those are just the highlights. Far more lies in the coverups.

In short. . .

This is really getting boring.
They also have the same job title. Is that proof that if someone says it was one person’s job title, that person is lying? Or does it mean they have essentially the same job, with essentially the same responsibilities, and that the HR/recruitment folks creating the job descriptions describe their needs in identical terms because they were taught the same scientific techniques for crafting those descriptions and may even have used each other as sources?
 

Schrodinger's Platypus

Radical Constitutional Extremist
Wow...you cannot stay focused on the damned topic...which is veritas...

They attempted to say that he was one of the people making policy for the station and that proved CNN was acting as a propaganda outlet to defeat Trump.

I gave you his linkedin profile AND his facebook profile.

You want to spend your time whining about the fact that his job description matches someone else's...that is not my problem. He deleted his linkedin profile...

Then you want to argue about him claiming to had an INTERGRAL part in the 2020 election.

Now...all you need to do to prove your point that I lied is to find a copy of his deleted linkedin profile AND then prove that he had anything at all to say about CNN's news broadcasts. As his Facebook profile shows, he operating video equipment for several of the CNN TV shows. Did he have anything at all to do with controlling content? If not you and Veritas lose.
Heh. No it’s not. It’s CNN, genius. Just like the title of the OP says.

Talk about inability to focus!

Aside from that, the topic is your inability to post a damn thing without lying!
 

Schrodinger's Platypus

Radical Constitutional Extremist
Key part of the argument here...."his real or imagined claim" had nothing to do with his f*cking job description...which was the whole f*cking point.

Wow...you cannot stay focused on the damned topic...which is veritas...

They attempted to say that he was one of the people making policy for the station and that proved CNN was acting as a propaganda outlet to defeat Trump.

I gave you his linkedin profile AND his facebook profile.

You want to spend your time whining about the fact that his job description matches someone else's...that is not my problem. He deleted his linkedin profile...

Then you want to argue about him claiming to had an INTERGRAL part in the 2020 election.

Now...all you need to do to prove your point that I lied is to find a copy of his deleted linkedin profile AND then prove that he had anything at all to say about CNN's news broadcasts. As his Facebook profile shows, he operating video equipment for several of the CNN TV shows. Did he have anything at all to do with controlling content? If not you and Veritas lose.
Back on topic now. . .

Here’s Charlie Chester talking about how CNN protects the narrative of BLM. More propaganda

Now why do you think Chester will talk about these issues privately with Project Veritas but not publicly with Project Veritas? If PV got it wrong why not set the record straight?

Is it because O’Keefe got it exactly right? And CNN doesn’t have a leg to stand on? Why not just sue the hell out of Project Veritas? Because CNN has no case whatsoever? Is that how this rolls out?
 

EatTheRich

President
Back on topic now. . .

Here’s Charlie Chester talking about how CNN protects the narrative of BLM. More propaganda

Now why do you think Chester will talk about these issues privately with Project Veritas but not publicly with Project Veritas? If PV got it wrong why not set the record straight?

Is it because O’Keefe got it exactly right? And CNN doesn’t have a leg to stand on? Why not just sue the hell out of Project Veritas? Because CNN has no case whatsoever? Is that how this rolls out?
Why do you think Project Veritas has been successfully sued and prosecuted so many times after defaming people with manipulated video?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Back on topic now. . .

Here’s Charlie Chester talking about how CNN protects the narrative of BLM. More propaganda

Now why do you think Chester will talk about these issues privately with Project Veritas but not publicly with Project Veritas? If PV got it wrong why not set the record straight?

Is it because O’Keefe got it exactly right? And CNN doesn’t have a leg to stand on? Why not just sue the hell out of Project Veritas? Because CNN has no case whatsoever? Is that how this rolls out?
so that is his opinion....bfd.
 
Top