Fauci is still here, and president Lysol got the boot. We see how america feels about the lives lost, huh?Not only did he lie, he funded the research that got us here. He should be under a jail.
Fauci is still here, and president Lysol got the boot. We see how america feels about the lives lost, huh?Not only did he lie, he funded the research that got us here. He should be under a jail.
And Joe Biden is President. A veritable cornucopia of stupidity.Fauci is still here, and president Lysol got the boot. We see how america feels about the lives lost, huh?
your bullshit about the study has already burned to the ground. 6ft away in a specially ventilated space.....give up.And as the air studies I cited have shown, all the mask wearing was fatuous virtue signalling, because the virus isn't airborne, at least not in concentrations that would make you sick (and especially outdoors).
We kept going through "stages" where you morons insisted all we need to do is give up more of our personal liberties and the disease will be beaten, all all that happened was we lost more of our liberties.
Seriously, where would you expect to encounter more "airborne" virus, in a covid ward of a hospital or a garden party? There is no such thing as a "super spreader event" except in the fevered little minds of you maskscists...
I see this lie never dies.
I already posted the scientific reasoning behind thinking were not necessary early on. Fauci changed the recommendation, but Trump didn't...explain that...
There was no scientific reasoning. You certainly in your entire life have NEVER posted anything scientific. You are incapable of that. Fauci just plain LIED about this. He also directed US taxpayer dollars to build that lab.
What would Biden be impeached for? First you have to have a reason...not just cuz you think Trump becomes president then.
For a felony that son of a bitch already admitted to on video. Forget impeachment. He committed a crime and should have been arrested. And Obama should have been arrested for being an accomplice to that.
Using the BLACKMAIL of withholding AMerican taxpayer dollars just to change prosecutors to save his son from investigation.
(Two tiered justice system. A Republican tries this and he's arrested immediately.)
Gee...could it be that Trump (and the rest of the anti-Fauci morons) lied?Yes it does
That was the hospital ward - they also sampled air in Nursing Homes and prisons (oops)! Guess what? Still no viable virus!your bullshit about the study has already burned to the ground. 6ft away in a specially ventilated space.....give up.
Covid is spread through contact with infected mucous. Which is largely contained by wearing a mask.That was the hospital ward - they also sampled air in Nursing Homes and prisons (oops)! Guess what? Still no viable virus!
Did they measure the air at that distance to prove distancing worked? Nope! They measured at that distance because they felt that is where they would get the most accurate readings. The closer readings could be affected by people fluffing their pillows or just rolling over in bed.
They weren't studying the effectiveness of distancing, or they would have measured the air closer than 1 to 2 meters, and calculated the difference. They wanted to know if the virus was truely airborne - and they didn't want their data skewed by the particles we know are all over the sick persons themselves.
I put their quote (in bold) in my (various) posts. They didn't say "it appears keeping 3 feet away from a sick person will keep you from ingesting aerosolized virus" - they said "according to the obtained results, it is suggested that airborne transmission may not have much effect on this pandemic."
What part of that is so hard for you to understand?
Oh, and good news! I read a study today (out of South America) that claimed to show people who wore masks got the virus at much lower rates than those who didn't! So you can feel free to wear a damn mask to protect yourself, and shut the [Unwelcome language removed] up about me having to wear one to keep you safe!
Not getting the virus is also a way of protecting others. Anyway, you have one cherry-picked study that you seem to want to pretend refutes the bulk of the research.That was the hospital ward - they also sampled air in Nursing Homes and prisons (oops)! Guess what? Still no viable virus!
Did they measure the air at that distance to prove distancing worked? Nope! They measured at that distance because they felt that is where they would get the most accurate readings. The closer readings could be affected by people fluffing their pillows or just rolling over in bed.
They weren't studying the effectiveness of distancing, or they would have measured the air closer than 1 to 2 meters, and calculated the difference. They wanted to know if the virus was truely airborne - and they didn't want their data skewed by the particles we know are all over the sick persons themselves.
I put their quote (in bold) in my (various) posts. They didn't say "it appears keeping 3 feet away from a sick person will keep you from ingesting aerosolized virus" - they said "according to the obtained results, it is suggested that airborne transmission may not have much effect on this pandemic."
What part of that is so hard for you to understand?
Oh, and good news! I read a study today (out of South America) that claimed to show people who wore masks got the virus at much lower rates than those who didn't! So you can feel free to wear a damn mask to protect yourself, and shut the [Unwelcome language removed] up about me having to wear one to keep you safe!
you just keep making shit up...I've been vaccinated. I worry more about morons who refuse to wear masks and won't get vaccinated becoming hosts for new versions of covid.That was the hospital ward - they also sampled air in Nursing Homes and prisons (oops)! Guess what? Still no viable virus!
Did they measure the air at that distance to prove distancing worked? Nope! They measured at that distance because they felt that is where they would get the most accurate readings. The closer readings could be affected by people fluffing their pillows or just rolling over in bed.
They weren't studying the effectiveness of distancing, or they would have measured the air closer than 1 to 2 meters, and calculated the difference. They wanted to know if the virus was truely airborne - and they didn't want their data skewed by the particles we know are all over the sick persons themselves.
I put their quote (in bold) in my (various) posts. They didn't say "it appears keeping 3 feet away from a sick person will keep you from ingesting aerosolized virus" - they said "according to the obtained results, it is suggested that airborne transmission may not have much effect on this pandemic."
What part of that is so hard for you to understand?
Oh, and good news! I read a study today (out of South America) that claimed to show people who wore masks got the virus at much lower rates than those who didn't! So you can feel free to wear a damn mask to protect yourself, and shut the [Unwelcome language removed] up about me having to wear one to keep you safe!
It’s amazing that so many millions of people got sick (or died) inhaling “nonviable virus.”That was the hospital ward - they also sampled air in Nursing Homes and prisons (oops)! Guess what? Still no viable virus!
Did they measure the air at that distance to prove distancing worked? Nope! They measured at that distance because they felt that is where they would get the most accurate readings. The closer readings could be affected by people fluffing their pillows or just rolling over in bed.
They weren't studying the effectiveness of distancing, or they would have measured the air closer than 1 to 2 meters, and calculated the difference. They wanted to know if the virus was truely airborne - and they didn't want their data skewed by the particles we know are all over the sick persons themselves.
I put their quote (in bold) in my (various) posts. They didn't say "it appears keeping 3 feet away from a sick person will keep you from ingesting aerosolized virus" - they said "according to the obtained results, it is suggested that airborne transmission may not have much effect on this pandemic."
What part of that is so hard for you to understand?
Oh, and good news! I read a study today (out of South America) that claimed to show people who wore masks got the virus at much lower rates than those who didn't! So you can feel free to wear a damn mask to protect yourself, and shut the [Unwelcome language removed] up about me having to wear one to keep you safe!
The fact is scince has no (real) idea hpw contageous diseases spread. You believe it is from breathing aerosolized particles? Fine, go wear a mask! I saw a recent study out of South America that suggests masks protect the WEARER! Hallaluja! You no longer have to be an authoritarian maskhole about it. Just put your mask on and shut the f*ck up about it!It’s amazing that so many millions of people got sick (or died) inhaling “nonviable virus.”
;-)
So you expect to exhert your authoritarian assholism over everyone for, like what, ever? What a shock!you just keep making shit up...I've been vaccinated. I worry more about morons who refuse to wear masks and won't get vaccinated becoming hosts for new versions of covid.
Well, if my mask gets polluted with my "infected mucus" and then I fuss with it all day long and then use the hands that just touched my mask to serve you your coffee cup, how exactly is that "containing" it?Covid is spread through contact with infected mucous. Which is largely contained by wearing a mask.
What are you trying to argue here?Well, if my mask gets polluted with my "infected mucus" and then I fuss with it all day long and then use the hands that just touched my mask to serve you your coffee cup, how exactly is that "containing" it?
Actually, that is exactly what it is. One guy (or gal) doing that negates a billion uninfected people wearing masks (correctly). This isn't rocket science.What are you trying to argue here?
That we shouldn't wear masks because some people are too stupid to do it effectively?
That is not a logical argument at all.
There were multiple (similar) studies with (similar) results. By "bulk of the research" I assume you mean "conventional wisdom" - you know like the whole "suggestions that the virus escaped from a lab is a conspiracy theory" "consensus?"Not getting the virus is also a way of protecting others. Anyway, you have one cherry-picked study that you seem to want to pretend refutes the bulk of the research.
No, sinking to the level of idiots who can't figure out a simple task liking wearing a mask is not going to end the pandemic and restore life to normal. If you want the pandemic to end you have the raise the bar for idiots, Stop catering to them.Actually, that is exactly what it is. One guy (or gal) doing that negates a billion uninfected people wearing masks (correctly). This isn't rocket science.
And right there, ladies and gentlemen, in a nut shell, demonstrates the precise reason why soialist policies always (ALWAYS) fail. In order for sicialist policies to work, you need to "raise the bar for idiots." Does anyone know of any real world examples where that has ever worked? Anyone? Bueller?No, sinking to the level of idiots who can't figure out a simple task liking wearing a mask is not going to end the pandemic and restore life to normal. If you want the pandemic to end you have the raise the bar for idiots, Stop catering to them.
Yes you selfish ****s. You were asked to give up some of your so-called "freedoms" in order to protect each other until there was a vaccine. Instead, your ilk killed people, and you have no remorse or regret for hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths in this country that selfishness caused.And as the air studies I cited have shown, all the mask wearing was fatuous virtue signalling, because the virus isn't airborne, at least not in concentrations that would make you sick (and especially outdoors).
We kept going through "stages" where you morons insisted all we need to do is give up more of our personal liberties and the disease will be beaten, all all that happened was we lost more of our liberties.
Seriously, where would you expect to encounter more "airborne" virus, in a covid ward of a hospital or a garden party? There is no such thing as a "super spreader event" except in the fevered little minds of you maskscists...
Apparently you are completely unaware (or ignorant) of the scientific studies that suggest the person/years lost due to the deleterious effects of the widespread use of lockdowns will end up dwarfing those lost to covid-19.Yes you selfish ****s. You were asked to give up some of your so-called "freedoms" in order to protect each other until there was a vaccine. Instead, your ilk killed people, and you have no remorse or regret for hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths in this country that selfishness caused.
Deplorable !