Step away from the mirroryou're so cute when you play dumb, seriously dude
So far you haven't proven anything Boca posted isn't True
Step away from the mirroryou're so cute when you play dumb, seriously dude
I did. Can you answer my post #12?So you can't refute the claim of Suzi Voyles. How expected.
Boca hasn't posted anything to prove it is true. Voyles says ballots looked like they were xeroxed. That isn't proof of anything.Step away from the mirror
So far you haven't proven anything Boca posted isn't True
Nor have you proven anything is not trueBoca hasn't posted anything to prove it is true. Voyles says ballots looked like they were xeroxed. That isn't proof of anything.
So they swore under oath that in their opinions the ballots looked like they'd been run through a copy machine....do you understand that perjury could never be charged when they testify of their opinions?Who is Boyles?
Aside from that a Judge made the decision based on the number of witnesses who swore under oath as well appearing before the state Senate Judiciary subcommittee.
BTW why so agitated....insecure?
answer the points in post #12. Logic and an understanding of the process shows her allegations couldn't possibly be true.Nor have you proven anything is not true
Where's you proof it's false____________
Okay one case and one appeal. Who were the other 50+ and where are they located?The three judge panel that tossed Trump's lawsuit in PA were all republicans and the one who wrote the opinion was appointed by Trump.
Appeals court rejects Trump challenge of Pennsylvania race
PHILADELPHIA (AP) — President Donald Trump’s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected the campaign's latest effort to challenge the state’s election results.apnews.com
I think I have exposed your low credibility website before, but keep up the great work of spreading misinformation and lies ! Pretty sad you keep running to these kook websites thinking you found something credible - guess what you didn't - except to far right loonies
The Epoch Times
Epoch Times is Right Biased, conservative and Questionable with low credibility and reliability.Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Overall, we rate The Epoch Times Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as numerous failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Well, there are the 9 judges on the Supreme court, three of whom were appointed by Trump....did you need their names?Okay one case and one appeal. Who were the other 50+ and where are they located?
That's funny - your story is about UNION elections not elections for public office.The only way dem/libs can win elections is CHEAT
Unions ensure victory through deception, and Democrats want to keep it that way (msn.com)
Quite sure I said "elections"That's funny - your story is about UNION elections not elections for public office.
Oh and by the way - the last time I remember any political party insisting that all of the votes be cast PUBLICLY so that everyone would know how each person voted was in Trump's SECOND impeachment trial. The (D)s floated the idea of secret ballots and the (R)s shut it down because they were afraid that some of their members would actually do the right thing and convict the traitor Trump.
So you posted off topic intentionally.Quite sure I said "elections"
Wonder which libs it would Trigger
In a thread about the 2020 presidential election you bring up union elections....yeah, that's the topic...Unions.Quite sure I said "elections"
Wonder which libs it would Trigger
Listen to what Gabe Sterling had to say...do you prefer listening to Trump, Rudy, Powell?Nor have you proven anything is not true
Where's you proof it's false____________
I posted dem/libs will do anything to winSo you posted off topic intentionally.
That is not what Voyles said.Boca hasn't posted anything to prove it is true. Voyles says ballots looked like they were xeroxed. That isn't proof of anything.
Can you answer your post? Not my job to answer any of your question regarding your cover up.I did. Can you answer my post #12?
I will, your #12 is all about envelopes and how they are handled, counted and opened, yet Volyes' and others complaint was about unfolded creaseless ballots that had never seen an envelope but were counted. Many times apparently as was recorded on security cameras after the room was cleared at about 10PM.How many times would we recount the ballots? How many times will the republican elections officials in Ga have to tell you that the election there was not stolen and that fraud was minimal. Trump said thousands of dead voters cast ballots. They actually found two.
AZ had two recounts and audits in Maricopa county...now they are doing a third with an inexperienced and uncertified auditor that is reliably on board with the "stop the steal" bullshit. Do you actually think whatever they find will be useful?
Read my post #12. Can you answer any of the points I made?