New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The easiest way to sum up the insurrection.

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Manufactured:

1624185162106.png

If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.

Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.

It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?

A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.

We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.




Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
 

Boca

Governor
Manufactured:

View attachment 63625

If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.

Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.

It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?

A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.

We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.




Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
In other words it was allowed to happen for political purposes. As Obama's White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said, " Never let a crisis go to waste."

But when the [D]'s didn't have one they improvised and created one hoping to imprison President Trump and once and for all, after 5 years of trying dispose of him and prevent him from ever holding office again.

Evil is incurable.
 
Last edited:

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
Manufactured:

View attachment 63625

If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.

Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.

It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?

A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.

We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.




Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
Revolver news - kook site alert !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and this one posts and believes them !
Probably paid the 4.99 to go ad free !


Is the revolver news site biased or questionable?
Overall, we rate Revolver.News right biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing techniques and a complete lack of transparency. Founded in 2020, Revolver.News is a conservative news aggregation/curation website that claims to be the new Drudge Report.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Revolver news - kook site alert !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and this one posts and believes them !
Probably paid the 4.99 to go ad free !


Is the revolver news site biased or questionable?
Overall, we rate Revolver.News right biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing techniques and a complete lack of transparency. Founded in 2020, Revolver.News is a conservative news aggregation/curation website that claims to be the new Drudge Report.
As I recall, Drudge made its mark by scooping the mainstream media on these kinds of stories they wouldn't touch out of fear of not being invited to the next White House Press Corp dinner. You guys have a lot of nerve trying to continue to run this "fact checking" scam after having it blow up so spectacularly in your faces over the past several years.
 

Addy

Rebuild With Biden!
In other words it was allowed to happen for political purposes. As Obama's White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said, " Never let a crisis go to waste."

But when the [D]'s didn't have one they improvised and created one hoping to imprison President Trump and once and for all, after 5 years of trying dispose of him and prevent him from ever holding office again.

Evil is incurable.
That's some imagination you have there. Wow... such an unbelievable, fictional, scenario you created.
 

Spamature

President
Manufactured:

View attachment 63625

If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.

Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.

It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?

A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.

We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.




Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
WTF ?

The HEAD OF THE FEDERAL GOVT organized the entire thing. Are you just going to pretend that this was not Trump's event and that he should not be responsible for it outcome ? He literally told them to go there and even told them that he was going to march there with them.

The lying and the right has become purely pathological and unhinged.
 

Addy

Rebuild With Biden!
WTF ?

The HEAD OF THE FEDERAL GOVT organized the entire thing. Are you just going to pretend that this was not Trump's event and that he should not be responsible for it outcome ? He literally told them to go there and even told them that he was going to march there with them.

The lying and the right has become purely pathological and unhinged.
They are trying to rewrite history, plain and simple, these type of lies need to be called out every time(anywhere and any place) they are repeated.
___________________________

How the FBI became the target of a conspiracy theory about the Jan. 6 Capitol riot
snip---
On Tuesday night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson told his roughly three million viewers that it appeared “the FBI was organizing the riots of Jan. 6.” Though Carlson provided no evidence for this inflammatory allegation, his claim was quickly picked up and repeated as fact by a number of other conservative pundits and Republican lawmakers.

Over the course of two days, outraged calls for the truth about the FBI’s supposed involvement in the Capitol riots ricocheted across social media, making their way to FBI headquarters and even into the Congressional record.

The FBI false-flag narrative did not originate with Tucker Carlson, however, but with an article published Monday by Revolver News, a right-wing website run by former Trump speechwriter Darren Beattie. Beattie, who was fired from the White House in 2018 for attending a conference alongside white supremacists, was later appointed by Trump on his way out of office to a government commission that preserves Holocaust-related sites in Europe.

It’s unclear whether anyone other than Beattie writes for Revolver, as no bylines appear to be on the site’s original posts, including this week’s “exclusive” suggesting the FBI was behind the Capitol riots.
 

Spamature

President
They are trying to rewrite history, plain and simple, these type of lies need to be called out every time(anywhere and any place) they are repeated.
___________________________

How the FBI became the target of a conspiracy theory about the Jan. 6 Capitol riot
snip---
On Tuesday night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson told his roughly three million viewers that it appeared “the FBI was organizing the riots of Jan. 6.” Though Carlson provided no evidence for this inflammatory allegation, his claim was quickly picked up and repeated as fact by a number of other conservative pundits and Republican lawmakers.

Over the course of two days, outraged calls for the truth about the FBI’s supposed involvement in the Capitol riots ricocheted across social media, making their way to FBI headquarters and even into the Congressional record.

The FBI false-flag narrative did not originate with Tucker Carlson, however, but with an article published Monday by Revolver News, a right-wing website run by former Trump speechwriter Darren Beattie. Beattie, who was fired from the White House in 2018 for attending a conference alongside white supremacists, was later appointed by Trump on his way out of office to a government commission that preserves Holocaust-related sites in Europe.

It’s unclear whether anyone other than Beattie writes for Revolver, as no bylines appear to be on the site’s original posts, including this week’s “exclusive” suggesting the FBI was behind the Capitol riots.
So it's gone from blue lives matter to the cops are the real criminals.

Trumpism is one helluva drug.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Manufactured:

View attachment 63625

If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.

Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.

It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?

A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.

We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.




Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
"IF IT TURNS OUT"....So at the moment you have no evidence what so ever, but you would like to have investigations into the issue to see if you can dig something up...

Meanwhile we do have evidence of collaboration between the groups responsible for the riot and republicans refuse to investigate the riot. It is enough for them to arrest and prosecute those caught by the FBI, but we don't really want to know if the Trump campaign paid for the riot...
 

Addy

Rebuild With Biden!
Yes, you could call going from the middle of the day to the dark of midnight a "contrast", at the very least.
We should be used to their hypocrisy by now... still it needs to be pointed out. Jim Acosta does it well. :)
_______________
Jim Acosta Declared Tucker Carlson The Fox News ‘Bullsh*t Factory’ Employee Of The Month: ‘Nobody Bullsh*ts Like You

Acosta, who anchors CNN’s Newsroom on the weekends, has used the program to deliver video essays about the news media and Republicans at large. And on Saturday he criticized the right wing response to January 6, the latest of which was submarining an investigation into the deadly breach of houses of congress in an attempt to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s victory in the Electoral College.

In particular, he targeted Fox News’s Tucker Carlson for his incessant rhetoric defending those who stormed Washington DC and tried to stop the democratic process and undermining confidence in the election by following Trump’s “big lie” that he actually won the election.



Acosta reminded viewers that he coined the term “bullsh*t factory” for Fox News earlier in the year, “in honor of the steady stream of bogus segments aimed at ginning up your outrage.” But one employee, he says has “really outdone himself this week.”
Jim Acosta Declared Tucker Carlson The Fox News 'Bullsh*t Factory' Employee Of The Month: 'Nobody Bullsh*ts Like You' (uproxx.com)
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
WTF ?

The HEAD OF THE FEDERAL GOVT organized the entire thing. Are you just going to pretend that this was not Trump's event and that he should not be responsible for it outcome ? He literally told them to go there and even told them that he was going to march there with them.

The lying and the right has become purely pathological and unhinged.
Link please to Trump's comments that fomented "armed insurrection?"
 

EatTheRich

President

Spamature

President
Link please to Trump's comments that fomented "armed insurrection?"
I said outcome.

It was HIS event.

If you won't hold Trump responsible for something he created and then executed, then I guess no one is to blame for what happened.

You have gaslighted yourself into total denial, and there is no need to discuss this any further, because you've emptied the Kool-Aid pitch down to the last drop.
 

Boca

Governor
That's some imagination you have there. Wow... such an unbelievable, fictional, scenario you created.
Thank you. I appreciate that Addy. Wouldn't it be wonderful if more folks were openminded and curious enough to try to explain baffling puzzles?

Like for instance the FBI having all the intel and plans for the Capitol event and apparently did nothing to prevent it?
 
Top