New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Yeah, they really are this stupid

PNWest

America's BEST American: Impartial and Bipartisan
You talk like they were a separate country. They were just as American as those living in the north. In their minds, they were defending the country they knew from northern oppression.
No they were not. They left the United States and became their own country.... or at least tried to. They were not Americans.
 

Colorforms

Senator
No they were not. They left the United States and became their own country.... or at least tried to. They were not Americans.
No, they didn't. The south was never allowed to secede. If they were, there would have never been a war. You should maybe learn a little history before making rash judgements on who is a traitor and who isn't.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You talk like they were a separate country. They were just as American as those living in the north. In their minds, they were defending the country they knew from northern oppression.
How can you defend your country by going to war against it?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
No, they didn't. The south was never allowed to secede. If they were, there would have never been a war. You should maybe learn a little history before making rash judgements on who is a traitor and who isn't.
You forget who started the war. It was the confederates who opened fire on a Federal fort.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
No they were not. They left the United States and became their own country.... or at least tried to. They were not Americans.
You sure hate your NC American ancestors since you keep posted that BS
 

PNWest

America's BEST American: Impartial and Bipartisan
Pure Lie
South never got to secede

In that case they were just pur and simple traitors taking up arms against their own government. No wonder republicans love them.
 

PNWest

America's BEST American: Impartial and Bipartisan
In that case they were just pur and simple traitors taking up arms against their own government. No wonder republicans love them.
Like the blacks that fought with the South
Don't forget the Jews that fought for Hitler.....
 

EatTheRich

President
Yeah, I'm sure Aunt Jemima personally inflicted terror on every person today that is not so well off.....or the simple name of a baseball team caused you all distress......or remember America's past...good or bad.....is a racist conspiracy. You sound as idiotic is the OP.



Again, using nebulous ideas that you cannot measure and pretending they are real? What's "white privilege"? Is that where students with worse grades or applicants with weaker resumes can be admitted to schools or get jobs simply because they AREN' white like affirmative action? Is it where you can make up 13% of the population but collect 35 or 40% of the welfare and free handouts paid by everyone else? Is it where you can commit violent crime at 5 times the rate of other races but then claim it's not the crime you are committing but a mass conspiracy against you for the reason police arrest you?

Yep, that's "white privilege". What fools.
White applicants with worse grades and weaker resumes get admitted to schools and get jobs more often than Blacks. That’s verifiable white privilege.
 

EatTheRich

President
Aunt Jemima isn't "whitewashing". It's maple syrup. Your brain has been suffered mass cell killing apparently, though.



Here you go. Nothing you can backup with statistics. This is how the mentally ill left wing mind works. Everything is an "idea" or "concept".....or whatever nebulous shit you come up with. Here are the cold hard facts. Black men commit violent crime at 5 times the rate of other races. Therefore, they get into violent confrontations/arrests with police officers. The end.

You want there to be no more "cycle"? Then stop committing all kinds of atrocious violent criminal acts. Have you noticed we don't see a lot of 80 year old ladies getting into with cops......regardless of race. That's because they aren't out stealing, robbing, looting, and shooting people.

Now I'm done discussing "concepts" or "ideas". Stuff you cannot define, is entirely subjective to bias, and which is totally abstract. We have statistics. Stay there or stfu. We clear, left winger?
That the infinitesimal fraction of Blacks committing crimes is higher than the infinitesimal fraction of whites committing crimes does not in any way explain why law-abiding Black people are so much more likely than law-abiding white people to have adverse encounters with police.
 

EatTheRich

President
You talk like they were a separate country. They were just as American as those living in the north. In their minds, they were defending the country they knew from northern oppression.
And by “northern oppression” you mean peacefully accepting that they lost an election to a candidate who had more support in the north and that the government would not be dominated by Southern slave holders as it had been for 60 years, right?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
That the infinitesimal fraction of Blacks committing crimes is higher than the infinitesimal fraction of whites committing crimes does not in any way explain why law-abiding Black people are so much more likely than law-abiding white people to have adverse encounters with police.
13% are black and commit 50%+ of crimes......
12 year old girl killed to day in Charlotte, NC due to a drive by

Net proves you wrong
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
And by “northern oppression” you mean peacefully accepting that they lost an election to a candidate who had more support in the north and that the government would not be dominated by Southern slave holders as it had been for 60 years, right?
Slave holder were black and white Democrats
 

EatTheRich

President
Slave holder were black and white Democrats
Most of the slaveowners were in fact white Democrats. The small minority of slaveowners who were Black were mostly Whigs, as were a minority of the white slaveowners. There were even some slaveowners who were Republicans, Federalists, Know-Nothings, and the list goes on ...
 

Mick

The Right is always right
That the infinitesimal fraction of Blacks committing crimes is higher than the infinitesimal fraction of whites committing crimes does not in any way explain why law-abiding Black people are so much more likely than law-abiding white people to have adverse encounters with police.
1/3 of black men will spend time behind bars at some point during their iifetime for a crime or crimes they've committed. There is nothing "infinitesimal" about it. That said, this wasn't a conversation as to the number of blacks committing crimes as opposed to blacks not committing crimes. This is comparing the rate of blacks committing violent crimes as opposed to other races. Blacks commit 5 times as many violent crimes so they get into far more police encounters. That's a simple fact. Are you suggesting that those who commit 5 times the crime should have the same number of police interactions? That's an awful, racist viewpoint for anyone to take.

And, no, blacks are not more likely to have "adverse encounters with police" when they encounter police. White people are more likely to be killed per police interaction than blacks. That data on this doesn't lie. Mentally ill left wingers lie.

Now look unless you are going to use data and facts there is no need to keep discussing.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
White applicants with worse grades and weaker resumes get admitted to schools and get jobs more often than Blacks.
We've already shown the data on this time and time again. The fact you are forced to lie to justify it should show you there is something egregiously wrong. You are too damn dumb and too estrogen confused to get that.
 

EatTheRich

President
1/3 of black men will spend time behind bars at some point during their iifetime for a crime or crimes they've committed. There is nothing "infinitesimal" about it. That said, this wasn't a conversation as to the number of blacks committing crimes as opposed to blacks not committing crimes. This is comparing the rate of blacks committing violent crimes as opposed to other races. Blacks commit 5 times as many violent crimes so they get into far more police encounters. That's a simple fact. Are you suggesting that those who commit 5 times the crime should have the same number of police interactions? That's an awful, racist viewpoint for anyone to take.

And, no, blacks are not more likely to have "adverse encounters with police" when they encounter police. White people are more likely to be killed per police interaction than blacks. That data on this doesn't lie. Mentally ill left wingers lie.

Now look unless you are going to use data and facts there is no need to keep discussing.
What is racist is holding Blacks as a race collectively responsible for the actions of those Blacks who are criminals. Whites are more likely to be killed per police interaction because whites are unlikely to have police interactions unless they are committing crimes, which explains why whites killed by police are so much more likely to have guns than Blacks who are killed by police. Meanwhile, Blacks are less likely to be killed per interaction but more likely to be killed overall because innocent Blacks who aren't committing crimes routinely are hassled by police, and each time there is a chance ... not as great a chance as with the white criminal popping off with a gun ... that that Black person will be killed.
 
Top