New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

- Joel Greenberg Confirms (Right Wing Cult god )Matt Gaetz had sex with minor in leaked letter: ‘I did see the acts occur firsthand’

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
Here we go right wingers, let the crocodile tears flow - don't be a hypocrite now..........


Is it the end of the line for Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz? The embattled Republican has been fighting allegations of sex trafficking for weeks, and now it seems like he's got no defense left. A new letter, written by his friend and 'wingman' Joel Greenberg, reportedly confirms most of the allegations that have been reported in the press.

The confessional letter was reportedly written during the final days of the Trump administration and confirms Gaetz had sex with multiple women, including a minor. Greenberg who was under federal indictment reportedly asked Roger Stone to help him secure a pardon from former President Donald Trump.

The confession letter was written by Greenberg as part of efforts to obtain the pardon after a series of texts were exchanged between Stone and Greenberg, said the report. Those texts, also obtained by the Daily Beast, revealed how far Greenberg was willing to go. Exchanged in late 2020, the texts were reportedly sent over Signal and set to disappear. However, Greenberg had apparently taken screenshots of the texts.



"If I get you $250k in Bitcoin would that help or is this not a financial matter," Greenberg texted. Stone then replied, "I understand all of this and have taken it into consideration. I will know more in the next 24 hours I cannot push too hard because of the nonsense surrounding pardons." On January 13, Stone texted, "I hope you are prepared to wire me $250,000 because I am feeling confident". In December, Greenberg texted, "my lawyers that I fired, know the whole story about MG’s involvement. They know he paid me to pay the girls and that he and I both had sex with the girl who was underage.”
 

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
Yes, and it was swept under the rug wasn't it. Nothing wrong with the archives

Just putting it out there for the crocodile tears criers to think about as the post their hypocritical responses.

You know the right wing double standard on display.

Investigate a dem - good

Investigate a right wing demi god - nothing to see here - it is a witch hunt

Funny how Cuomo tried the greatest loser's strategy witch hunt and it didn't work for him. It must be a New York thing ?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Yes, and it was swept under the rug wasn't it. Nothing wrong with the archives

Just putting it out there for the crocodile tears criers to think about as the post their hypocritical responses.

You know the right wing double standard on display.

Investigate a dem - good

Investigate a right wing demi god - nothing to see here - it is a witch hunt

Funny how Cuomo tried the greatest loser's strategy witch hunt and it didn't work for him. It must be a New York thing ?
That makes 2 articles you've posted from April, 2021 as OP's

Who's the topic in this diatribe OP

(1) Gaetz
(2) Cuomo
(3) greatest loser
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
Yes, and it was swept under the rug wasn't it. Nothing wrong with the archives

Just putting it out there for the crocodile tears criers to think about as the post their hypocritical responses.

You know the right wing double standard on display.

Investigate a dem - good

Investigate a right wing demi god - nothing to see here - it is a witch hunt

Funny how Cuomo tried the greatest loser's strategy witch hunt and it didn't work for him. It must be a New York thing ?
"it was swept under the rug wasn't it"

Don't know, this is your little tale, so was it? Or was not enough evidence found? You tell us...

Look, with out even trying to argue one perspective or the other, you elected to title your post, "Joel Greenberg CONFIRMS (Right Wing Cult god )Matt Gaetz had sex with minor in leaked letter:", but DID he? Really?

I am asking because, in spite of the confidence you expressed in your title choice, when actually reading your linked to article I see only a lot of, let's just say, "speculation".

Such as;
"A leaked letter reportedly confirms..."
"A new letter, …., reportedly confirms most of the allegations"
"The ...letter was reportedly written … and confirms"
"the texts were reportedly sent over Signal and set to disappear."
"However, Greenberg had apparently taken screenshots of the texts."


All of which appears very suspect but none of which actually "confirms" what you stated in there manner you believe.

Was this investigated further or was it not? If it was, what was determined? Were the allegations confirmed or not? Was action called for and not taken? Was nothing confirmed and the subject been dismissed?



Do better. Be better.
 
Top