no... well surprise...
hey man.Are you offering a trade? Vaccine mandates for voter ID? Interesting notion but I don't believe you have the authority to offer terms my good sir.
Maybe I’m missing something…Well, let's look at the list:
Freedom to
- not have something injected into your body that you don't want
- not have to prove you are who you say you are to vote
- ignore border security laws
- not pay for services that you benefit from
I guess the obvious difference is that one has the government demanding to inject something into your body without your consent, or terrorize your life and economic livelihood if you don't comply.
The rest are laws on the books, and pretty crappy behavior if you want to avoid partaking in them. I don't see the connection.
we live in a civil society, yes? that's kind of the foundation of things... ence the laws and requirements, like ID and so on.Well, let's look at the list:
Freedom to
- not have something injected into your body that you don't want
- not have to prove you are who you say you are to vote
- ignore border security laws
- not pay for services that you benefit from
I guess the obvious difference is that one has the government demanding to inject something into your body without your consent, or terrorize your life and economic livelihood if you don't comply.
The rest are laws on the books, and pretty crappy behavior if you want to avoid partaking in them. I don't see the connection.
Well, if our experts and pols suggested that we had to have those things injected into our bodies, you have my guarantee that I’d oppose them as well.to choose no voter ID? Or no legal immigration application? or no tax filing? Or to come to America riddled with disease? Etc ..
sounds good.. meanwhile....Well, if our experts and pols suggested that we had to have those things injected into our bodies, you have my guarantee that I’d oppose them as well.
That reminded me of the letter to the editor I ran across the other day...we live in a civil society, yes? that's kind of the foundation of things... ence the laws and requirements, like ID and so on.
In the spirit of mutual well being...we might want to collaborate on saaay..things like ending this pandemic. much like we collaborate on law order, and so on..
THerein is the connection.
meanwhile, yes, one is free to choose....but no one is terrorizing .. but equal to one persons right to choose not to vaccinate....is the equal right of another to refuse service, employ, etc... as is their right to safeguard their self, and others...by so doing..
thats about the size of it..
Yep. A messy business indeed…this liberty.sounds good.. meanwhile....
we live in a civil society, yes? that's kind of the foundation of things... ence the laws and requirements, like ID and so on.
In the spirit of mutual well being...we might want to collaborate on saaay..things like ending this pandemic. much like we collaborate on law order, and so on..
THerein is the connection.
meanwhile, yes, one is free to choose....but no one is terrorizing .. but equal to one persons right to choose not to vaccinate....is the equal right of another to refuse service, employ, etc... as is their right to safeguard their self, and others...by so doing..
fully vaxxed people have always carried whatever virus... mumps, etc... i dont follow.....it's a basic one... vaccines prevent the recipient from illness... nothign more.Yep. A messy business indeed…this liberty.
I expected that the [now weeks old] learning that fully vaxxed people (such as myself) still carry and shed virus regularly would dial down the “coerced vaccine” rhetoric.
I’m not sure how the COVIDOPHILE FETISHISTS square the whole “forced masks on everyone because we all spread it” … and “get the vax or you’re a hateful spreader” schtick.
Geeze. Next they’ll tell me to go to law school so I can lay bricks.
well, because in a civil society there is order... like the orderly casting of one persons vote at a timeWell no... Voter ID is to prevent fraud, not because of some "civil society".
Meanwhile, sure, it would be great if the pandemic would end, but...
- COVID will never cease to exist, so as long as you're playing the zero-sum game, we'll always be "in a pandemic", and we'll continue to have mini-tyrant governors and politicians like Fauci make non-data backed claims of doom and gloom so they can continue to try to control the populace. They are not only avoiding the data, but are chasing an impossible goal, and condemning and bullying anyone who won't jump onto their insanity. And yes, forcing the populace to do anything based on a .0007% risk of death is insane. I expect all who demand this to never drive a car again, or leave their houses for that matter.
- The pandemic, as far as a pandemic is defined, is over. The numbers are still 95-90% less than when we were at the worst of it. It's now just a lingering strain. Cities are implementing major orders on their populace despite the fact that COVID deaths are like 3 times less than murder rates.
- Liberty is more important that safety, especially when that "safety" isn't nearly provable or defined. Lock downs and masks don't show any substantial improvements in suppressing the virus. The Vaccine is very effective, but if you're fine with condemning, pressuring, or forcing people to do something to their bodies, you're just falling prey to authoritarian convenience.
well, because in a civil society there is order... like the orderly casting of one persons vote at a time
... um, okay?well, because in a civil society there is order... like the orderly casting of one persons vote at a time
Correct. Now then, since the vax carries with it neither immunity nor the end of communicability, folks should lay off all talk of coercion, “show me zee paperz”, and so forth.fully vaxxed people have always carried whatever virus... mumps, etc... i dont follow.....it's a basic one... vaccines prevent the recipient from illness... nothign more.