New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

I charge treason - a High Crime and Misdemeanor

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
You're going to take Business Insider at face value? :rolleyes:

The difference is that Trump was prosecuting a war while Biden committed a deliberate Crime for political gain. He directly did it to deflect from the face losing killing And maiming of American servicemen at the airport.
I'm pretty sure that wasn't a declared "war" either. But you're right - I don't know the details of those events like I do this one. I have long been against the US' military exploits in the ME.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Trump assassinated a man on Iraqi soil who was a High official of the Iranian government. He could easily have ordered that he be arrested And tried.

That was a war Crime.
Not quite the same thing as obliterating an aid worker and a bunch of children to create the appearance of retaliation for the deaths of 13 US troops - at least Trump killed the right guy. But you can't find a single post of mine celebrating that assassination anyway.

Your bias is showing if you think those two events are identical.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Over 100 policemen needed medical care thanks to the hugs And kisses from your fascist pals on Jan 6th.


How many needed medical care thanks to your BLM/Antifa rioters all across the country last summer? Were some cops assaulted? No doubt (although I might ask how many of those "over 100" needed medical attention due to a direct assault). Are you trying to paint thousands of peaceful protesters with that (broad) brush? Absolutely!
 

Boca

Governor
I, a citizen of these United States, charge President of the United States of America, JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN Jr., with treason. For not defending the borders of our nation And for bringing And harboring certain aliens. He is a law breaker. Is there a second?

§ 1324. Bringing in And harboring certain aliens
(a) Criminal penalties
(1)(A) Any person who—
(i) knowing that a person is an alien, brings
to or attempts to bring to the United States in
any manner whatsoever such person at a place
other than a designated port of entry or place
other than as designated by the Commissioner,
regardless of whether such alien has received
prior official authorization to come to,
enter, or reside in the United States And regardless
of any future official action which
may be taken with respect to such alien;
(ii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the
fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains
in the United States in violation of law,
transports, or moves or attempts to transport
or move such alien within the United States
by means of transportation or otherwise, in
furtherance of such violation of law;
(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the
fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains
in the United States in violation of law,
conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or
attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection,
such alien in any place, including any
building or any means of transportation
;
(iv) encourages or induces an alien to come
to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing
or in reckless disregard of the fact that
such coming to, entry, or residence is or will
be in violation of law; or

(v)(I) engages in any conspiracy to commit
any of the preceding acts, or
(II) aids or abets the commission of any of
the preceding acts,
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph

(B).
(B) A person who violates subparagraph (A)
shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a
violation occurs—
(i) in the case of a violation of subparagraph
(A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of
subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the
offense was done for the purpose of commercial
advantage or private financial gain, be
fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than
10 years, or both;
(ii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph
(A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title
18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(iii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph
(A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) during And in
relation to which the person causes serious
bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title
18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any
person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not
more than 20 years, or both; And
(iv) in the case of a violation of subparagraph
(A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in
the death of any person, be punished by death
or imprisoned for any term of years or for life,
fined under title 18, or both.
(C) It is not a violation of clauses 1 (ii) or (iii)
of subparagraph (A), or of clause (iv) of subparagraph
(A) except where a person encourages or
induces an alien to come to or enter the United
States, for a religious denomination having a
bona fide nonprofit, religious organization in
the United States, or the agents or officers of
such denomination or organization, to encourage,
invite, call, allow, or enable an alien who is
present in the United States to perform the vocation
of a minister or missionary for the denomination
or organization in the United States
as a volunteer who is not compensated as an employee,
notwithstanding the provision of room,
board, travel, medical assistance, And other
basic living expenses, provided the minister or
missionary has been a member of the denomination
for at least one year.
(2) Any person who, knowing or in reckless
disregard of the fact that an alien has not received
prior official authorization to come to,
enter, or reside in the United States, brings to
or attempts to bring to the United States in any
manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of
any official action which may later be taken
with respect to such alien shall, for each alien in
respect to whom a violation of this paragraph
occurs—
(A) be fined in accordance with title 18 or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both;
or
(B) in the case of—
(i) an offense committed with the intent or
with reason to believe that the alien unlawfully
brought into the United States will
commit an offense against the United States
or any State punishable by imprisonment for
more than 1 year,
(ii) an offense done for the purpose of commercial
advantage or private financial gain,
(iii) an offense in which the alien is not
upon arrival immediately brought And presented
to an appropriate immigration officer
at a designated port of entry,
be fined under title 18 And shall be imprisoned,
in the case of a first or second violation of
subparagraph (B)(iii), not more than 10 years,
in the case of a first or second violation of
subparagraph (B)(i) or (B)(ii), not less than 3
nor more than 10 years, And for any other violation,
not less than 5 nor more than 15 years.
(3)(A) Any person who, during any 12-month
period, knowingly hires for employment at least
10 individuals with actual knowledge that the
individuals are aliens described in subparagraph
(B) shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for
not more than 5 years, or both.
(B) An alien described in this subparagraph is
an alien who—
(i) is an unauthorized alien (as defined in
section 1324a(h)(3) of this title), And
(ii) has been brought into the United States
in violation of this subsection.
(4) In the case of a person who has brought
aliens into the United States in violation of this
subsection, the sentence otherwise provided for
may be increased by up to 10 years if—
(A) the offense was part of an ongoing commercial
organization or enterprise;
(B) aliens were transported in groups of 10 or
more; And
(C)(i) aliens were transported in a manner
that endangered their lives; or
(ii) the aliens presented a life-threatening
health risk to people in the United States.
(b) Seizure And forfeiture
(1) In general
Any conveyance, including any vessel, vehicle,
or aircraft, that has been or is being used
in the commission of a violation of subsection
(a) of this section, the gross proceeds of such
violation, And any property traceable to such
conveyance or proceeds, shall be seized And
subject to forfeiture.
(2) Applicable procedures
Seizures And forfeitures under this subsection
shall be governed by the provisions of
chapter 46 of title 18 relating to civil forfeitures,
including section 981(d) of such title, except
that such duties as are imposed upon the
Secretary of the Treasury under the customs
laws described in that section shall be performed
by such officers, agents, And other persons
as may be designated for that purpose by
the Attorney General.
(3) Prima facie evidence in determinations of
violations
In determining whether a violation of subsection
(a) of this section has occurred, any of
the following shall be prima facie evidence
that an alien involved in the alleged violation
had not received prior official authorization to
come to, enter, or reside in the United States
or that such alien had come to, entered, or remained
in the United States in violation of
law:
(A) Records of any judicial or administrative
proceeding in which that alien’s status

was an issue And in which it was determined
that the alien had not received prior official
authorization to come to, enter, or reside in
the United States or that such alien had
come to, entered, or remained in the United
States in violation of law.
(B) Official records of the Service or of the
Department of State showing that the alien
had not received prior official authorization
to come to, enter, or reside in the United
States or that such alien had come to, entered,
or remained in the United States in
violation of law.
(C) Testimony, by an immigration officer
having personal knowledge of the facts concerning
that alien’s status, that the alien
had not received prior official authorization
to come to, enter, or reside in the United
States or that such alien had come to, entered,
or remained in the United States in
violation of law.
(c) Authority to arrest
No officer or person shall have authority to
make any arrests for a violation of any provision
of this section except officers And employees
of the Service designated by the Attorney
General, either individually or as a member of a
class, And all other officers whose duty it is to
enforce criminal laws.
(d) Admissibility of videotaped witness testimony
Notwithstanding any provision of the Federal
Rules of Evidence, the videotaped (or otherwise
audiovisually preserved) deposition of a witness
to a violation of subsection (a) of this section
who has been deported or otherwise expelled
from the United States, or is otherwise unable
to testify, may be admitted into evidence in an
action brought for that violation if the witness
was available for cross examination And the deposition
otherwise complies with the Federal
Rules of Evidence.
(e) Outreach program
The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation
with the Attorney General And the
Secretary of State, as appropriate, shall develop
And implement an outreach program to educate
the public in the United States And abroad about
the penalties for bringing in
I second this .......an outreach program to educate
the public in the United States.....
is sorely needed.

aoc.jpg
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
How many needed medical care thanks to your BLM/Antifa rioters all across the country last summer? Were some cops assaulted? No doubt (although I might ask how many of those "over 100" needed medical attention due to a direct assault). Are you trying to paint thousands of peaceful protesters with that (broad) brush? Absolutely!
The rioters on 1/6 were sent by Trump. Pretending it was like a tourist outing is just you protecting Trump.

No democratic leader said he loved the rioters or thought it patriotic to commit acts of violence. It is simply idiotic to minimize the attempted coup.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Not quite the same thing as obliterating an aid worker And a bunch of children to create the appearance of retaliation for the deaths of 13 US troops - at least Trump killed the right guy. But you can't find a single post of mine celebrating that assassination anyway.

Your bias is showing if you think those two events are identical.
1. Can you explain why the target was identified as a potential bomber? He was under surveillance. Not like Biden picked that car to blow up.
2. Link to the post where you condemned any of Trump's drone strikes.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
1. Can you explain why the target was identified as a potential bomber? He was under surveillance. Not like Biden picked that car to blow up.
2. Link to the post where you condemned any of Trump's drone strikes.
Civilian casualties from air strikes soared under Trump. Ever hear Trump cultists bitching about it? Nope.

But when it happens under Biden, when we KNEW that terrorists were seeking to kill our soldiers at the airport, Trump cultists claim Biden committed war crimes.

Such pathetic hacks just can’t be taken seriously.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
How many needed medical care thanks to your BLM/Antifa rioters all across the country last summer? Were some cops assaulted? No doubt (although I might ask how many of those "over 100" needed medical attention due to a direct assault). Are you trying to paint thousands of peaceful protesters with that (broad) brush? Absolutely!
I know of no elected democrat supporting the rioters in 2020. I have heard no elected official saying go and burn buildings to get justice for black people killed by cops.

On the other hand we have republicans saying the Jan 6 rioters did nothing wrong. Nearly 600 arrested and you think they are heroes.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Not quite the same thing as obliterating an aid worker and a bunch of children to create the appearance of retaliation for the deaths of 13 US troops - at least Trump killed the right guy. But you can't find a single post of mine celebrating that assassination anyway.

Your bias is showing if you think those two events are identical.
Biden was presented evidence of a suspect bombing about to happen. We had no ability to intercept the car before it could reach the airport.

Meanwhile; Trump accused a guy of terrorism, shows no evidence to anyone and orders him killed.

My mistake. Wrong drone attack. The facts are still that military intel identified a target. By Trump's rules, they neede no auth from the WH and would strike on their own.

Biden's rules required they get authorization from him. He did not pick a target.

Trump picked Soleimani.
 
Last edited:

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Biden was presented evidence of a suspect bombing about to happen. We had no ability to intercept the car before it could reach the airport.

Meanwhile; Trump accused a guy of terrorism, shows no evidence to anyone and orders him killed.

My mistake. Wrong drone attack. The facts are still that military intel identified a target. By Trump's rules, they neede no auth from the WH and would strike on their own.

Biden's rules required they get authorization from him. He did not pick a target.

Trump picked Soleimani.
And again, Trump at least hit the guy he wanted to kill. Biden was desperate to look "strong" after the debacle that was the Afghan withdrawal, and was no doubt pressuring the Pentagon to find SOMEONE they could take out to stop that (debacle) narrative that was all over the press (even in the usually compliant mainstream media). So they found this guy who was carrying water around to people who were hunkered down so they could survive a few more days. They killed an aid worker and a bunch of "collateral" kids. And then THEY LIED ABOUT IT:

Tucker: Biden finally forced to stop lying - YouTube

Repeatedly!

So to summarize - Trump identified a guy who was actually reported to be a terror supporting Iranian official (what do you think he was doing in Iraq, shopping?) and took that guy out. Biden, being the weasel he so obviously has been, well, forever, demands that the Pentagon find someone (anyone) they could assassinate to change the narrative of failure surrounding his debacle withdrawal and the loss of 13 troops, so they found a guy who they had no idea who he, you know, actually was, loading water into his car and they decided it could be, possibly, maybe, bombs; and so Biden gave them the go ahead to obliterate this aid worker and a bunch of kids, and then LIED ABOUT IT TO TRY AND COVER UP THE FACT THAT THEY KILLED INNOCENT PEOPLE, and you want to make Trump's move out to be pure evil and Biden's a simple "accident?" Do I have that about right?

This is just more evidence that you are a hack - you have always been a hack, and you will always be a hack.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
I know of no elected democrat supporting the rioters in 2020. I have heard no elected official saying go and burn buildings to get justice for black people killed by cops.

On the other hand we have republicans saying the Jan 6 rioters did nothing wrong. Nearly 600 arrested and you think they are heroes.
Go look up the word "tacit."

1631985156436.png

On the other hand, a bunch of normal people were there on Jan 6 and in fact did nothing wrong. To use your very logic, I know of no elected official who said "go break into the Capitol and attack the police." Yet you act like they did.

Because you are a hack. You have always been a hack. You will always be a hack.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
And again, Trump at least hit the guy he wanted to kill. Biden was desperate to look "strong" after the debacle that was the Afghan withdrawal, and was no doubt pressuring the Pentagon to find SOMEONE they could take out to stop that (debacle) narrative that was all over the press (even in the usually compliant mainstream media). So they found this guy who was carrying water around to people who were hunkered down so they could survive a few more days. They killed an aid worker and a bunch of "collateral" kids. And then THEY LIED ABOUT IT:

Tucker: Biden finally forced to stop lying - YouTube

Repeatedly!

So to summarize - Trump identified a guy who was actually reported to be a terror supporting Iranian official (what do you think he was doing in Iraq, shopping?) and took that guy out. Biden, being the weasel he so obviously has been, well, forever, demands that the Pentagon find someone (anyone) they could assassinate to change the narrative of failure surrounding his debacle withdrawal and the loss of 13 troops, so they found a guy who they had no idea who he, you know, actually was, loading water into his car and they decided it could be, possibly, maybe, bombs; and so Biden gave them the go ahead to obliterate this aid worker and a bunch of kids, and then LIED ABOUT IT TO TRY AND COVER UP THE FACT THAT THEY KILLED INNOCENT PEOPLE, and you want to make Trump's move out to be pure evil and Biden's a simple "accident?" Do I have that about right?

This is just more evidence that you are a hack - you have always been a hack, and you will always be a hack.
so you saw evidence that Trump knew Soleimani was responsible for acts of terrorim? Why not arrest him? He was surrounded by US troops.

Do you have evidence Biden instructed the military to kill someone, anyone? Of course not. You make shit up as you go.

Sure sign of a hack
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
so you saw evidence that Trump knew Soleimani was responsible for acts of terrorim? Why not arrest him? He was surrounded by US troops.

Do you have evidence Biden instructed the military to kill someone, anyone? Of course not. You make shit up as you go.

Sure sign of a hack
Again, I'm not in favor of anyone droning anyone. But Trump at least hit the guy he intended to kill, and not a bunch of "collateral" kids. If you think Biden, well, not Biden but rather his controllers, weren't raising holy heck with the Pentagon brass to get somebody, anybody, that they could pin the bomb attack that killed the troops on, you are dumber than I thought. Even the usually compliant left wing media was picking up on the narrative that Biden's Afghan retreat was a clusterf*ck. That the need to alter that narrative was defcon 1 million is not exactly rocket science. Again, Biden's people LIED REPEATEDLY about this attack, even claiming there were "secondary explosions" when, in fact, the video shows explicitly that there were none. They knew from the second that missile hit that they didn't blow up a car full of bombs or even bomb making materials. Yet they kept up the lies because they knew stooges like you would fall in line and defend them, even though it makes you look like, well, a stooge.

And you know why? Because you are a hack. You have always been a hack. And you will always be a hack.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
how did he and Kamala induce illegals.
Open your frigging eyes - by repealing the "stay in Mexico" policy Trump had put in place that had illegal immigration at very low levels. The illegal immigration statistics are now five to six times what they were last year, and this during the hottest time of the year. As fall arrives, those numbers will no doubt go up even more. Biden/Harris have opened the border. The fact that you will sit there and pretend they didn't is precisely why I say you are a hack, you have always been a hack, and you will always be a hack.
 
Top