I didn't surrender a thing.Again, the first sentence of my response could not have been more direct address of the OP subject. Why surrender to liars?
I didn't surrender a thing.Again, the first sentence of my response could not have been more direct address of the OP subject. Why surrender to liars?
I’m just sick to death of these insects - they even act in hives to attack others and petition mods (YOU) in solicitation of address of others (me).Try reading it again..this time with sarcasm. Perhaps not with some level of perceived critical analysis applied...the threshold of which I don't know.
I did not change the subject in this thread.seems so... like julie, like OCF, like WriteOn...a whole bunch of people changing.... why do you focus on Rick?
So?I did not change the subject in this thread.
Lie? You did wander off topic with your sermon...Yes, did I? Or did I rather directly respond to the OP question, repeating the question…noting that I am uncertain whether the GOP will take the House/Senate, citing specific contemporary issues that will drive voter sensibility regarding GOP vs. Dem selection, and then eventually mentioning some faith-related items?
Why must you LIE so often? How awful of you.
I responded on topic. Then - and only then - I addressed why conservatives are so much less in play when it comes to electoral politics.Lie? You did wander off topic with your sermon...
Don't lump me in with the threadjackers.
I did not say you didn't address the topic....why would you lie about it? You changed the topic by going off on the tangent of religion...which had nothing at all to do with the next election.I responded on topic. Then - and only then - I addressed why conservatives are so much less in play when it comes to electoral politics.
So, having now dispensed with your lie that I didn’t address the subject and instead changed it, I will await your apology. Because good faith demands it, yes?
(Don’t worry - I won’t really “wait” on that. You can just shirk as always on move along to your next line of baloney - probably some redefinition of what constitutes a threadjack).
Goodbye.
Ok .. let's hug it out ..Don't lump me in with the threadjackers.
You devoted one whole sentence to the topic..."I don't know".I responded on topic. Then - and only then - I addressed why conservatives are so much less in play when it comes to electoral politics.
So, having now dispensed with your lie that I didn’t address the subject and instead changed it, I will await your apology. Because good faith demands it, yes?
(Don’t worry - I won’t really “wait” on that. You can just shirk as always on move along to your next line of baloney - probably some redefinition of what constitutes a threadjack).
Goodbye.
I responded on topic. Then - and only then - I addressed why conservatives are so much less in play when it comes to electoral politics.
So, having now dispensed with your lie that I didn’t address the subject and instead changed it, I will await your apology. Because good faith demands it, yes?
(Don’t worry - I won’t really “wait” on that. You can just shirk as always on move along to your next line of baloney - probably some redefinition of what constitutes a threadjack).
Goodbye.
If you think that is changing the subject you are wrong.Ok .. let's hug it out ..
Ok... Seems his proposed solution was to focus on the divine and less so on the trappings of politicsIf you think that is changing the subject you are wrong.
The top post hates democrats. It is very clearly written.
I was proposing a solution to their hatred: hugs.
Hypocrisy at it's finestLie? You did wander off topic with your sermon...
Most Americans object to a system that is fixed.Trump told his followers to not vote if the Republican party did not fix the election system by looking into the 2020 election. It is a direct threat to the establishment Republicans. A threat they need to hear. A threat that needed saying.
“I don’t know and I don’t care but I will tell you God isn’t on lefty’s side” isn’t on topic. It is the same canned response you give regardless of the ostensible topic.I responded on topic. Then - and only then - I addressed why conservatives are so much less in play when it comes to electoral politics.
So, having now dispensed with your lie that I didn’t address the subject and instead changed it, I will await your apology. Because good faith demands it, yes?
(Don’t worry - I won’t really “wait” on that. You can just shirk as always on move along to your next line of baloney - probably some redefinition of what constitutes a threadjack).
Goodbye.
LINKMost Americans object to a system that is fixed.
LINK