Bronwyn
Unapoligetically Republican
In other words, it lets liberal vandals run wild to burn and destroy with no recourse.In other words, it stops police from initiating the use of force.
In other words, it lets liberal vandals run wild to burn and destroy with no recourse.In other words, it stops police from initiating the use of force.
Who's going to pay? Liberals say if you give the "Rona" you pay what about other damages?Shit hole. Handed over to the indolent evil
'Lawless city?' Worry after Portland police don't stop chaos
A crowd of 100 people wreaked havoc in downtown Portland, Oregon, this week, smashing storefront windows, lighting dumpsters on fire and causing at least $500,000 in damageabcnews.go.com
So like you?Who are the perps?
For sure, you know they're white.
Portland cops whining. Those damn police unions want free rein or they'll choose not to do their job - protect and serve. That's exactly what they did here.
Cops have gone easy on white perps like Proud Boys, etc,, so I'm guessing those are the perps.
Who are the perps?
For sure, you know they're white.
Portland cops whining. Those damn police unions want free rein or they'll choose not to do their job - protect and serve. That's exactly what they did here.
Cops have gone easy on white perps like Proud Boys, etc,, so I'm guessing those are the perps.
So you accept the proposition that private property (overwhelmingly originally accumulated as a result of pillage and violent exploitation) does not represent a moral right to set the terms of labor for producers?I say no such thing.
Elevate. Don't make it up
Not really. The fact that police *choose* to protest restrictions on *unreasonable* initiation of force by refusing to do their jobs just says that they are cowardly punks who like to pick on the defenseless.It causes police to be spectators to crimes. Directly and demonstrably so.
It stands to reason that the evil among us favor such things.
Nope. Police still have every legal power to arrest vandals. What they cannot do is ndiscrimiately attack crowds of nonviolent protesters even if a few among them are committing nonviolent crimes.In other words, it lets liberal vandals run wild to burn and destroy with no recourse.
So you accept the proposition that private property (overwhelmingly originally accumulated as a result of pillage and violent exploitation) does not represent a moral right to set the terms of labor for producers?
Gee, why didn't the cops just go and arrest a few?That there were/are perps is the singular standard that should be required, irrespective of mealymouthed marxist striation. White, brown, rich, poor - completely irrelevant. Proud Boys or Antifa - completely irrelevant.
Cops are now legislatively prevented from intervening unless they can prove a very clear danger of out of control, wanton mass public danger. Oregon’s congress has literally taken this out of police hands - and business people and bystanders alike are now thrown to the wolves. It is evil - and it is direct dereliction of duty. Government now shirks it’s legitimate scope in favor of the illegitimate.
A better, more compelling, MORE FRUITFUL impetus for carrying a weapon I’ve never seen.
Congrats, lefty. Mission accomplished. Even those formerly on the fence are now all-in on carrying. Welcome aboard, newbies. Taking personal responsibility for one’s safety is the right way to go.
Well done, overreaching leftists. You’ve done it again.
Not allowed to take preemptive action thanks to Democrats who favor criminals over the lawful, illegal aliens over citizens. The Democrats have CODIFIED the above.Gee, why didn't the cops just go and arrest a few?
False. As store owners continue to victimized, your komrades continue to assail, vandalize, and torch. Lefties have enshrined such into law.Not really. The fact that police *choose* to protest restrictions on *unreasonable* initiation of force by refusing to do their jobs just says that they are cowardly punks who like to pick on the defenseless.
A couple of cops chasing after and arresting 1 or 2 vandals is not taking preemptive action. It's doing their job.Not allowed to take preemptive action thanks to Democrats who favor criminals over the lawful, illegal aliens over citizens. The Democrats have CODIFIED the above.
Sad stuff.
You anti-police, anti-citizen Democrats codified legislation preventing preemption of crime in process. This is because dirtbags = the Democrat base. You’ve wrecked so many cities. Now, it was Portland’s turn (and Oregon itself).A couple of cops chasing after and arresting 1 or 2 vandals is not taking preemptive action. It's doing their job.
There’s no law prohibiting them from arresting people.Not allowed to take preemptive action thanks to Democrats who favor criminals over the lawful, illegal aliens over citizens. The Democrats have CODIFIED the above.
Sad stuff.
Not my comrades. If anything they are probably organized crime like the looters in Chicago. Which would explain the police turning the other way when there is NO mandate for them to do so.False. As store owners continue to victimized, your komrades continue to assail, vandalize, and torch. Lefties have enshrined such into law.
The moral obligation is to return the looted wealth to the masses so that we can work out our own destiny without their parasitism holding us back.A moral obligation...but not a right in the absolute
No. Because by and large it's not looted.The moral obligation is to return the looted wealth to the masses so that we can work out our own destiny without their parasitism holding us back.
No they're ANTIFANot my comrades. If anything they are probably organized Crime like the looters in Chicago. Which would explain the police turning the other way when there is NO mandate for them to do so.
Get A JOBThe moral obligation is to return the looted wealth to the masses so that we can work out our own destiny without their parasitism holding us back.